Optimization of genomic selection training populations with a genetic algorithm

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Akdemir, Deniz ^a   Sanchez, Julio I ^a   Jannink, Jean Luc ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b ROBERT W HOLLEY CENTER FOR AGRICULTURE AND HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MAIZE; OPTIMIZATION; PHENOTYPE; RICE; WHEAT;

ARABIDOPSIS; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

ALGORITHM; ARABIDOPSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MAIZE; ORYZA; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PROCEDURES; WHEAT;

ALGORITHMS; ARABIDOPSIS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; ORYZA; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; TRITICUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84928781832     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-015-0116-6     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Muir WM. Comparison of genomic and traditional blup-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet. 2007; 124:342-55.
2. Heslot N, Yang HP, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL. Genomic selection in plant breeding: a comparison of models. Crop Sci. 2012; 52:146-60.
3. Windhausen VS, Atlin GN, Hickey JM, Crossa J, Jannink JL, Sorrells M, et al. Effectiveness of genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance in different breeding populations and environments. G3 (Bethesda). 2012; 2:1427-36.
4. Crossa J, Pérez P, Hickey JM, Burguenó J, Ornella L, Cerón-Rojas J, et al. Genomic prediction in CIMMYT maize and wheat breeding programs. Heredity. 2014; 112:48-60.
5. Rincent R, Laloë D, Nicolas S, Altmann T, Brunel D, Revilla P, et al. Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: Comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (zea mays l.)Genetics. 2012; 192:715-28.
6. Elsen JM, de Givry S, Katsirelos G, Shumbusho F. Optimizing the reference population in a genomic selection design. Proceedings of WCB13 Workshop on Constraint Based Methods for Bioinformatics 37.
7. VanRaden P. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91:4414-23.
8. Henderson CR. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics. 1975; 31:423-47.
9. Laloë D, Phocas F, Ménissier F. Considerations on measures of precision and connectedness in mixed linear models of genetic evaluation. Genet Sel Evol. 1996; 28:359-78.
10. Misztal I, Wiggans G. Approximation of prediction error variance in large-scale animal models. J Dairy Sci. 1988; 71:27-32.
11. Hickey JM, Veerkamp RF, Calus M, Mulder HA, Thompson R. Estimation of prediction error variances via monte carlo sampling methods using different formulations of the prediction error variance. Genet Sel Evol. 2009; 41:1-9.
12. Resende MF, Munóz P, Resende MD, Garrick DJ, Fernando RL, Davis JM, et al. Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (pinus taeda l.)Genetics. 2012; 190:1503-10.
13. Ogutu JO, Schulz-Streeck T, Piepho HP. Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions. BMC Proc. 2012; 6:S10.
14. Hoerl AE, Kennard RW. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics. 1970; 12:55-67.
15. Piepho HP. Ridge regression and extensions for genomewide selection in maize. Crop Sci. 2009; 49:1165-76.
16. Endelman JB. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome. 2011; 4:250-5.
17. Petersen KB, Pedersen M S. The Matrix Cookbook. 2008. http://matrixcookbook.com.
18. Pronzato L, Muller WG. Design of computer experiments: space filling and beyond. Stat Comput. 2012; 22:681-701.
19. Fedorov VV. Theory of Optimal Experiments. New York: Academic Press Inc.; 1972.
20. Holland JH. Genetic algorithms and the optimal allocation of trials. SIAM J Comput. 1973; 2:88-105.
21. Davis LD. Handbook of Genetic Algorithms. vol. 115. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1991.
22. Goldberg DE. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Delhi: Pearson Education; 2006.
23. de Los Campos G, Gianola D, Rosa GJ, Weigel KA, Crossa J. Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel hilbert spaces methods. Genet Res (Camb). 2010; 92:295-308.
24. Gianola D, van Kaam JB. Reproducing kernel hilbert spaces regression methods for genomic assisted prediction of quantitative traits. Genetics. 2008; 178:2289-303.
25. Akdemir D, Godfrey OU. EMMREML: Fitting mixed models with known covariance structures. 2014. R package version 2.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=EMMREML.
26. Akdemir D. STPGA: Selection of training populations by genetic algorithm. 2014. R package version 1.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=STPGA.
27. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2013. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
28. Atwell S, Huang YS, Vilhialmsson BJ, Willems G, Horton M, Li Y, et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature. 2010; 465:627-31.
29. Zhao K, Tung CW, Eizenga GC, Wright MH, Ali ML, Price AH, et al. Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in oryza sativa. Nat Commun. 2011; 2:467.
30. Romay MC, Millard MJ, Glaubitz JC, Peiffer JA, Swarts KL, Casstevens TM, et al. Comprehensive genotyping of the USA national maize inbred seed bank. Genome Biol. 2013; 14:R55.
31. Wimmer V, Lehermeier C, Albrecht T, Auinger HJ, Wang Y, Schon CC. Genome-wide prediction of traits with different genetic architecture through efficient variable selection. Genetics. 2013; 195:573-87.
32. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JC. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics. 2009; 182:343-53.
33. Pukelsheim F. Optimal design of experiments. vol 50. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2006.
34. Melas VB. Functional approach to optimal experimental design. vol 184. New York: Springer; 2006.
35. Atkinson AC, Bailey R. One hundred years of the design of experiments on and off the pages of Biometrika. Biometrika. 2001; 88:53-97.