Population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Chabot, Dominique ^a,c   Craik, Shawn R ^b   Bird, David M ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Universite Sainte Anne   (Canada)

^c ING Robotic Aviation   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGE QUALITY; MONITORING; NESTLING; NONHUMAN; ORGANISM COLONY; PHOTOGRAPHY; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION SIZE; SEABIRD; SMALL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS; STERNA HIRUNDO; ANIMAL; CHARADRIIFORMES; GEOGRAPHY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HABITUATION; NESTING; NEW BRUNSWICK; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

LARIDAE; STERNA HIRUNDO;

AIRCRAFT; ANIMALS; CHARADRIIFORMES; GEOGRAPHY; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; NESTING BEHAVIOR; NEW BRUNSWICK; PHOTOGRAPHY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84928780560     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122588     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Parnell JF, Ainley DG, Blokpoel H, Cain B, Custer TW, Dusi JL, et al. Colonial waterbird management in North America. Col Waterbirds 1988; 11: 129-169.
2. Kushlan JA. Colonial waterbirds as bioindicators of environmental change. Col Waterbirds 1993; 16: 223-251.
3. Kingsford RT. Aerial survey of waterbirds on wetlands as a measure of river and floodplain health. Freshw Biol. 1999; 41: 425-438. PMID: 10598108
4. Diamond AW, Devlin CM. Seabirds as indicators of changes in marine ecosystems: ecological monitoring of Machias Seal Island. Environ Monit Assess. 2003; 88: 153-175. PMID: 14570414
5. Bechet A, Reed A, Plante N, Giroux J, Gauthier G. Estimating the size of the Greater Snow goose population. J Wildl Manage. 2004; 68: 639-649.
6. Kingsford RT, Porter JL. Monitoring waterbird populations with aerial surveys - what have we learnt? Wildl Res. 2009; 36: 29-40.
7. Rodway MS, Montevecchi WA, Chardine JW. Effects of investigator disturbance on breeding success of Atlantic puffins Fratercula arctica. Biol Conserv. 1996; 76: 311-319.
8. Carney KM, Sydeman WJ. A review of human disturbance effects on nesting colonial waterbirds. Waterbirds. 1999; 22: 68-79.
9. Blackmer AL, Ackerman JT, Nevitt GA. Effects of investigator disturbance on hatching success and nest-site fidelity in a long-lived seabird, Leach's storm-petrel. Biol Conserv. 2004; 116: 141-148.
10. Carey MJ. The effects of investigator disturbance on procellariiform seabirds: a review. NZ J Zool. 2009; 36: 367-377.
11. Vertigan C, McMahon CR, Andrews-Goff V, Hindell MA. The effect of investigator disturbance on egg laying, chick survival and fledging mass of Short-tailed shearwaters (Puffinus tenuirostris) and Little penguins (Eudyptula minor). Anim Welf. 2012; 21: 101-111.
12. Nisbet ICT. Disturbance, habituation, and management of waterbird colonies. Waterbirds. 2000; 23: 312-332.
13. Abd-Elrahman A, Pearlstine L, Percival F. Development of pattern recognition algorithm for automatic bird detection from unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. Survey Land Inform Sci. 2005; 65: 37-45.
14. Jones GP, Pearlstine LG, Percival HF. An assessment of small unmanned aerial vehicles for wildlife research. Wildl Soc Bull. 2006; 34: 750-758.
15. Watts AC, Perry JH, Smith SE, Burgess MA, Wilkinson BE, Szantoi Z, et al. Small unmanned aircraft systems for low-altitude aerial surveys. J Wildl Manage. 2010; 74: 1614-1619.
16. Chabot D, Bird DM. Evaluation of an off-the-shelf unmanned aircraft system for surveying flocks of geese. Waterbirds. 2012; 35: 170-174.
17. Sarda-Palomera F, Bota G, Vinolo C, Pallares O, Sazatornil V, Brotons L, et al. Fine-scale bird monitoring from light unmanned aircraft systems. Ibis. 2012; 154: 177-183.
18. Frederick PC, Towles T, Sawicki RJ, Bancroft GT. Comparison of aerial and ground techniques for discovery and census of wading bird (Ciconiiformes) nesting colonies. Condor. 1996; 98: 837-841.
19. Boyd SW. A comparison of photo counts versus visual estimates for determining the size of Snow goose flocks. J Field Ornithol. 2000; 71: 686-690.
20. Cordts SD, Zenner GG, Koford RR. Comparison of helicopter and ground counts for waterfowl in Iowa. Wildl Soc Bull. 2002; 30: 317-326.
21. Rodgers JA, Kubilis PA, Nesbitt SA. Accuracy of aerial surveys of waterbird colonies. Waterbirds. 2005; 28: 230-237.
22. Laursen K, Frikke J, Kahlert J. Accuracy of 'total counts' of waterbirds from aircraft in coastal waters. Wildlife Biol. 2008; 14: 165-175.
23. Craik SR, Titman RD. Nesting ecology of Red-breasted mergansers in a Common tern colony in eastern New Brunswick. Waterbirds. 2009; 32: 282-292.
24. Boyne AW, Hudson JK. Census of terns and other colonial waterbirds along the Gulf of St. Lawrence coast of New Brunswick - 2000. Technical Report Series No. 999. Canadian Wildlife Service, Atlantic Region; 2002.
25. Burger J, Gochfeld M. The Common Tern: Its Breeding Biology and Social Behavior. New York: Columbia University Press; 1991.
26. Chabot D, Bird DM. Small unmanned aircraft: precise and convenient new tools for surveying wetlands. J Unmanned Veh Syst. 2013; 1: 15-24. doi: 10.1186/1687-4153-2013-15 PMID: 24215841
27. McGarigal K, Marks BJ. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General technical report PNW-GTR-351. Portland: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; 1995.
28. Nisbet IC. Common tern (Sterna hirundo). In: Poole A, editor. The Birds of North America Online. Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; 2002. Available: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/618.
29. Courtney P. Seasonal variation in intra-clutch hatching intervals among Common terns Sterna hirundo. Ibis. 1979; 121: 207-211.
30. Bollinger PB, Bollinger EK, Malecki RA. Tests of three hypotheses of hatching asynchrony in the Common tern. Auk. 1990; 107: 696-706.
31. Morris RD, Wiggins DA. Ruddy turnstones, Great horned owls, and egg loss from Common tern clutches. Wilson Bull. 1986; 98: 101-109.
32. Koh LP, Wich SA. Dawn of drone ecology: low-cost autonomous aerial vehicles for conservation. Trop Conserv Sci. 2012; 5: 121-132.
33. Anderson K, Gaston KJ. Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Front Ecol Environ. 2013; 11: 138-146.
34. Rango A, Laliberte AS. Impact of flight regulations on effective use of unmanned aircraft systems for natural resources applications. J Appl Remote Sens. 2010; 4: 043539.
35. Mulac BL. Remote sensing applications of unmanned aircraft: challenges to flight in United States airspace. Geocarto Int. 2011; 26: 71-83.
36. Watts AC, Ambrosia VG, Hinkley EA. Unmanned aircraft systems in remote sensing and scientific research: classification and considerations of use. Remote Sens. 2012; 4: 1671-1692.