Reproducibility of trabecular bone score with different scan modes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a phantom study

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 573-576

  Bandirali, Michele ^a   Di Leo, Giovanni ^b   Messina, Carmelo ^a   Pastor Lopez, Maria Juana ^c   Mai, Alessandro ^a   Ulivieri, Fabio M ^c   Sardanelli, Francesco ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN DONATO   (Italy)

^c FONDAZIONE IRCCS CA GRANDA OSPEDALE MAGGIORE POLICLINICO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Dual energy X ray absorptiometry; Osteoporosis; Reproducibility; Trabecular bone score

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BONE DENSITY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BONE DENSITY; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84928772646     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: 14322161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-014-1980-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy. JAMA. 2001;285:785–95.
2. Bouxsein ML, Seeman E. Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2009;23:741–53.
3. Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C, et al. Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:581–9.
4. Brandi ML. Microarchitecture, the key to bone quality. Rheumatology. 2009;48 Suppl 4:iv3–8.
5. Wainwright SA, Marshall LM, Ensrud KE, et al. Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:2787–93.
6. Kanis JA, Hans D, Cooper C, Task Force of the FRAX Initiative, et al. Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(9):2395–411. doi:10.1007/s00198-011-1713-z.
7. Pothuaud L, Carceller P, Hans D. Correlations between grey-level variations in 2D projection images (TBS) and 3D microarchitecture: applications in the study of human trabecular bone microarchitecture. Bone. 2008;42:775–87.
8. Pothuaud L. Process of interpretation of two-dimensional densitometry images for the prediction of bone mechanical strength. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer-Verlag GmbH; 2004. p. 1079–80.
9. Hans D, Barthe N, Boutroy S, Pothuaud L, Winzenrieth R, Krieg MA. Correlations between trabecular bone score, measured using anteroposterior dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry acquisition, and 3-dimensional parameters of bone microarchitecture: an experimental study on human cadaver vertebrae. J Clin Densitom. 2011;14(3):302–12. doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.005.
10. Delnevo A, Bandirali M, Di Leo G, et al. Differences among array, fast array, and high-definition scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry on a phantom. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(6):616–9. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2012.11.017.
11. Bousson V et al. Trabecular bone score (TBS): available knowledge, clinical relevance, and future prospects. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:1489–501.
12. Lewiecki EM, Gordon CM, Baim S, et al. Special report on the 2007 adult and pediatric Position Development Conferences of the International Society for clinical densitometry. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(10):1369–78. doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0689-9.
13. Blake GM, Fogelman I. Role of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom. 2007;10(1):102–10.
14. Bandirali M, Sconfienza LM, Aliprandi A, et al. In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Radiol Med. 2014;119(4):257–60. doi:10.1007/s11547-013-0342-3.
15. Bandirali M, Lanza E, Messina C et al. Dose Absorption in Lumbar and Femoral Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations using three different scan modalities: an anthropomorphic phantom study. J Clin Densitom. 2013;24. doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2013.02.005.