What is the future of the case method in management education in India?

Vikalpa

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 87-131

  Dixit, Mukund R ^a   Manikutty, S ^a   Rao, S Sreenivas ^a   Monippally, M M ^a   Bijapurkar, Rama ^a   Raghuram, G ^a   Krishnan, Rishikesha T ^b   Mitra, Sumit ^c   Murthy, K R S ^a   Joseph, Jerome ^a   Jain, Abhinandan ^a   Srinivasan, Shiva Kumar ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT BANGALORE   (India)

^c INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT INDORE   (India)

Author keywords

Case based Problem; Culture; Decision making; Googalization; Methodical Management; Performing Communication; Solving; The Socratic Method; WAC

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928768441     PISSN: 02560909     EISSN: 23953799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0256090920050408     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Hofstede, G (2001). Culture’s Consequences, Second Edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Hofstede, G (1980). Culture’s Consequences, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Gragg, Charles L (1954). “Because Wisdom Can’t Be Told,” in McNair, MP and Hersum, AC (eds.), The Case Method at the Harvard Business School: Papers by Present and Past Members of the Faculty and Staff, New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Copeland, Melvin (1958). And Mark an Era: The Story of the Harvard Business School, Boston: Little, Brown&Company.
5. Dunn, Albert H (1954). “Basic Characteristics of the Case Method,” in McNair and Hersum, op. cit.
6. Kolb, D A (1976). Learning Style Inventory Manual, Boston, MA.: McBer & Company.