Quantitative and qualitative assessment of the bovine abortion surveillance system in France

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Volumn 120, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 62-69

  Bronner, Anne ^a   Gay, Emilie ^a   Fortané, Nicolas ^b   Palussière, Mathilde ^a   Hendrikx, Pascal ^c   Hénaux, Viviane ^a   Calavas, Didier ^a  

^a Groupement Hospitalier Est Hospices Civils   (France)

^b Universite Paris Dauphine   (France)

^c FRENCH AGENCY FOR FOOD   (France)

Author keywords

Assessment; Attributes; Brucellosis; Data quality; Passive surveillance

Indexed keywords

BOS; BOVINAE;

ANIMAL; BOVINE; BRUCELLOSIS, BOVINE; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH SURVEY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALS; BRUCELLOSIS, BOVINE; CATTLE; DATA ACCURACY; FEMALE; FRANCE; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREGNANCY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84928757656     PISSN: 01675877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.02.019     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Akoka J., Berti-Equille L., Boucelma O., Bouzeghoub M., Comyn-Wattiau I., Cosquer M., Goasdoué-Thion V., Kedad Z., Nugier S., Peralta V., Sisaid-Cherfi S. A framework for quality evaluation in data integration systems. 9th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems 2007.
2. Anon. L223-5. Code rural et de la pêche maritime 2003.
3. Anon. Article R. 223-79 du Code rural et de la pêche maritime JORF 07.08.2003 2003.
4. Batini C., Cappiello C., Francalanci C., Maurino A. Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Comput. Surv. 2009, 41.
5. Bronner A., Hénaux V., Fortané N., Hendrikx P., Calavas D. Why farmers and veterinarians do not report all bovine abortions, as requested by the clinical brucellosis surveillance system in France?. BMC Vet. Res. 2014, 10:93-100.
6. Bronner A., Hénaux V., Vergne T., Vinard J.-L., Morignat E., Hendrikx P., Calavas D., Gay E. Assessing the mandatory bovine abortion notification system in France using unilist capture-recapture approach. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e63246.
7. CDC Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems - recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group 2001, http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5013a1.htm.
8. CIHI The CIHI Data Quality Framework, Ottawa 2009.
9. Doyle T.J., Glynn M.K., Groseclose S.L. Completeness of notifiable infectious disease reporting in the United States: an analytical literature review. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2002, 155:866-874.
10. Drewe J., Hoinville L., Cook A., Floyd T., Gunn G., Stärk K. A new framework for the evaluation of animal health surveillance. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2015, 62:33-45.
11. Drewe J., Hoinville L., Cook A., Floyd T., Stark K. Evaluation of animal and public health surveillance systems: a systematic review. Epidemiol. Infect. 2012, 140:575-590.
12. England T., Kelly L., Jones R., MacMillan A., Wooldridge M. A simulation model of brucellosis spread in British cattle under several testing regimes. Prev. Vet. Med. 2004, 63:63-73.
13. Fediaevsky A., Dufour B., Garin-Bastuji B. Maintaining vigilance against bovine brucellosis in France in 2010. Bull. épidémiol. Santé anim. - aliment. 2011, 46:10-14.
14. Forar A., Gay J., Hancock D., Gay C. Fetal loss frequency in ten Holstein dairy herds. Theriogenology 1996, 45:1505-1513.
15. Glaser B., Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research 1967, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
16. Graneheim U., Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ. Today 2004, 24:105-112.
17. Hadorn D., Haracic S.S., Stärk K. Comparative assessment of passive surveillance in disease-free and endemic situation: example of Brucella melitensis surveillance in Switzerland and in Bosnia and Herzegovina. BMC Vet. Res. 2008, 4:1-9.
18. Hadorn D., Stark K. Evaluation and optimization of surveillance systems for rare and emerging infectious diseases. Vet. Res. 2008, 39:2008033.
19. Hendrikx P., Gay E., Chazel M., Moutou F., Danan C., Richomme C., Boue F., Souillard R., Gauchard F., Dufour B. OASIS: an assessment tool of epidemiological surveillance systems in animal health and food safety. Epidemiol. Infect. 2011, 139:1486-1496.
20. Hovingh E. Abortion in Dairy Cattle. II. Diagnosing and Preventing Abortion Problems 2002.
21. Johnson M.H., Notter D.R. Simulation of genetic control of reproduction in beef cows. I. Simulation model. J. Anim. Sci. 1987, 65:68-75.
22. Juran J., Gryna F. Juran's Quality Control Handbook 1988, McGraw-Hill, New York.
23. Nicoletti P. The epidemiology of bovine brucellosis. Adv. Vet. Sci. Comp. Med. 1980, 24:69-98.
24. Nusinovici S., Seegers H., Joly A., Beaudeau F., Fourichon C. Increase in the occurrence of abortions associated with exposure to the bluetongue virus serotype 8 in naïve dairy herds. Theriogenology 2012, 78:1140-1151.
25. OIE Country Reports http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Countryinformation/Countryreports.
26. OIE Terrestrial animal health code. Bovine Brucellosis 2012, (Chapter 11.3), http://www.oie.int/index.php?id=169&L=0&htmfile=chapitre_1.11.3.htm.
27. Palussière M., Calavas D., Bronner A. Evaluation de la qualité des données collectées dans le cadre du dispositif de déclaration obligatoire des avortements chez les bovins en France. Bull. Epidémiol. Anses-DGAl 2013, 58:17-20.
28. Perrin J.-B., Dutot R., Fediaevsky A. Le CSD-ESA: un outil de pilotage pour la surveillance épidémiologique en santé animale. Bull. Epidémiol. Anses-DGAl 2014, 32:26-29.
29. Pipino L., Lee Y.W., Wang R.Y. Data Quality Assessment 2002, 211-218. Communications of the ACM.
30. Redman T. Data Quality. The Field Guide 2001, Digital Press, Boston.
31. Sawford K. Animal Health Surveillance for Early Detection of Emerging Infectious Disease Risks 2011, 206-209. Department of Medical Science, Calgary, Alberta.
32. Sorbe A., Chazel M., Gay E., Haenni M., Madec J., Hendrikx P. A simplified method of performance indicators development for epidemiological surveillance networks - application to the RESAPATH surveillance network. Rev. épidémiol. santé publ. 2011, 59:149-158.
33. Vergne T., Calavas D., Cazeau G., Durand B., Dufour B., Grosbois V. A Bayesian zero-truncated approach for analysing capture-recapture count data from classical scrapie surveillance in France. Prev. Vet. Med. 2012, 105:127-135.
34. Vilas V.D.R., Böhning D. Application of one-list capture-recapture models to scrapie surveillance data in Great Britain. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 85:253-266.
35. Wang R. A production perspective on total data quality management. ACM Comput. Surv. 1998, 41.
36. Weiskopf N., Weng C. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2013, 20:144-151.
37. World Health Organisation Health Systems Strengthening - Glossary 2014.
38. Yamamoto T., Tsutsui T., Nishiguchi A., Kobayashi S. Evaluation of surveillance strategies for bovine brucellosis in Japan using a simulation model. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 86:57-74.