New Lower-Limb gait asymmetry indices based on a depth camera

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 4605-4623

  Auvinet, Edouard ^a,b   Multon, Franck ^a,c   Meunier, Jean ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ RENNES 2   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Asymmetry; Depth camera; Gait; Kinect

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS;

ASYMMETRY; CALIBRATION PROCEDURE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DEPTH CAMERA; GAIT; KINECT; MOTION CAPTURE SYSTEM; PLACEMENT OF SENSORS;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS;

BIOMECHANICS; EXERCISE TEST; GAIT; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; KINETICS; LOWER LIMB; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; VIDEORECORDING; WALKING;

BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; EXERCISE TEST; GAIT; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KINETICS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MOVEMENT; VIDEO RECORDING; WALKING;

EID: 84928690539     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s150304605     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Griffin, M.P.; Olney, S.J.; McBride, I.D. Role of symmetry in gait performance of stroke subjects with hemiplegia. Gait Posture 1995, 3, 132–142.
2. Sadeghi, H.; Allard, P.; Prince, F.; Labelle, H. Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: A review. Gait Posture 2000, 12, 34–45.
3. Böhm, H.; Döderlein, L. Gait asymmetries in children with cerebral palsy: Do they deteriorate with running? Gait Posture 2012, 35, 322–327.
4. Patterson, K.K.; Gage, W.H.; Brooks, D.; Black, S.E.; McIlroy, W.E. Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: A comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization. Gait Posture 2010, 31, 241–246.
5. James, P.; Nicol, A.; Hamblen, D. A comparison of gait symmetry and hip movements in the assessment of patients with monoarticular hip arthritis. Clin. Biomech. 1994, 9, 162–166.
6. Gurney, B. Leg length discrepancy. Gait Posture 2002, 15, 195–206.
7. Auvinet, B.; Berrut, G.; Touzard, C.; Moutel, L.; Collet, N.; Chaleil, D.; Barrey, E. Reference data for normal subjects obtained with an accelerometric device. Gait Posture 2002, 16, 124–134.
8. Gouwanda, D.; Senanayake, S.A. Identifying gait asymmetry using gyroscopes-A cross-correlation and Normalized Symmetry Index approach. J. Biomech. 2011, 44, 972–978.
9. Kaufman, K.R.; Miller, L.S.; Sutherland, D.H. Gait asymmetry in patients with limb-length inequality. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 1996, 16, 144–150.
10. Corazza, S.; Mündermann, L.; Chaudhari, A.M.; Demattio, T.; Cobelli, C.; Andriacchi, T.P. A markerless motion capture system to study musculoskeletal biomechanics: Visual hull and simulated annealing approach. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 34, 1019–1029.
11. Clark, R.A.; Bower, K.J.; Mentiplay, B.F.; Paterson, K.; Pua, Y.H. Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of spatiotemporal gait variables. J. Biomech. 2013, 46, 2722–2725.
12. Paolini, G.; Peruzzi, A.; Mirelman, A.; Cereatti, A.; Gaukrodger, S.; Hausdorff, J.M; Della Croce, U. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. Available online: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6998126 (accessed on 17 February 2015).
13. Stone, E.E.; Skubic, M. Unobtrusive, continuous, in-home gait measurement using the Microsoft Kinect. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 60, 2925–2932.
14. Shotton, J.; Fitzgibbon, A.; Cook, M.; Sharp, T.; Finocchio, M.; Moore, R.; Kipman, A.; Blake, A. Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images. In Proceeding of the 24th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 21–23 June 2011; pp. 1297–1304.
15. Pfister, A.; West, A.M.; Bronner, S.; Noah, J.A. Comparative abilities of Microsoft Kinect and Vicon 3D motion capture for gait analysis. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2014, 38, 274–280.
16. Shepard, D. A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM National Conference, New York, NY, USA, 27–29 August 1968; pp. 517–524.
17. NASA. Anthropometric Source Book Volume 2: A Handbook of Anthropometric Data, NASA Reference Publication 1978. Available online: https://archive.org/download/nasa_techdoc_19790005540/19790005540.pdf (accessed on 17 February 2015)
18. Khoshelham, K.; Elberink, S.O. Accuracy and Resolution of Kinect Depth Data for Indoor Mapping Applications. Sensors 2012, 12, 1437–1454.
19. Auvinet, E.; Multon, F.; Aubin, C.E.; Meunier, J.; Raison, M. Detection of gait cycles in treadmill walking using a Kinect. Gait Posture 2014, doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.08.006.
20. Wu, G.; Siegler, S.; Allard, P.; Kirtley, C.; Leardini, A.; Rosenbaum, D.; Whittle, M.; D’Lima, D.; Cristofolini, L.; Witte, H., et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—Part I: Ankle, hip, and spine. J. Biomech. 2002, 35, 543–548.
21. Leardini, A.; Cappozzo, A.; Catani, F.; Toksvig-Larsen, S.; Petitto, A.; Sforza, V.; Cassanelli, G.; Giannini, S. Validation of a functional method for the estimation of hip joint center location. J. Biomech. 1999, 32, 99–103.
22. Holt, K.G.; Hamill, J.; Andres, R.O. Predicting the minimal energy costs of human walking. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1991, 23, 491–498.
23. Bhave, A.; Paley, D.; Herzenberg, J.E. Improvement in gait parameters after lengthening for the treatment of limb-length discrepancy. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1999, 81, 529–534.
24. Riley, P.O.; Paolini, G.; Croce, U.D.; Paylo, K.W.; Kerrigan, D.C. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture 2007, 26, 17–24.