Improved dengue fever prevention through innovative intervention methods in the city of Salto, Uruguay

Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 134-142

  Basso, César ^a   da Rosa, Elsa García ^a   Romero, Sonnia ^a   González, Cristina ^b   Lairihoy, Rosario ^a   Roche, Ingrid ^a   Caffera, Ruben M ^a   da Rosa, Ricardo ^b   Calfani, Marisel ^c   Alfonso Sierra, Eduardo ^d   Petzold, Max ^e   Kroeger, Axel ^d,f   Sommerfeld, Johannes ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^b Ministerio de Salud Pública   (Uruguay)

^c Departamento de Medio Ambiente Intendencia de Salto   (Uruguay)

^d WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^f LIVERPOOL SCHOOL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aedes aegypti; Community participation; Cost analysis; Eco bio social research; Entomological indices; Inter sectorial approaches

Indexed keywords

AEDES AEGYPTI; ARTICLE; CONTAINER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; DECISION MAKING; DENGUE; EGG LAYING; EMPOWERMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; LEADERSHIP; NEIGHBORHOOD; NONHUMAN; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUPA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEASONAL VARIATION; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL STRUCTURE; STUDY DESIGN; TANK; URBAN AREA; URUGUAY; VECTOR CONTROL; VIRUS TRANSMISSION; AEDES; ANIMAL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY CARE; DISEASE CARRIER; ECOSYSTEM; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HEALTH; MOSQUITO; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARASITOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TRANSMISSION; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY; ZOOLOGY;

AEDES AEGYPTI;

AEDES; ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DENGUE; DISEASE RESERVOIRS; ECOSYSTEM; ENTOMOLOGY; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MOSQUITO CONTROL; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PUPA; URBAN HEALTH; URUGUAY; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 84928664672     PISSN: 00359203     EISSN: 18783503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/tru183     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Basso C, Caffera R, García da Rosa E et al. Mosquito-producing containers, spatial distribution and relationship between Aedes aegypti population indices on the southern boundary of its distribution in South America (Salto-Uruguay). Am J Trop Med Hyg 2012;87:1083-8.
2. Díaz-Nieto LM, Maciá A, Perotti MA et al. Geographical limits of the southeastern distribution of Aedes aegypti (Diptera, Culicidae) in Argentina. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013;7:e1963.
3. Quintero J, Brochero H, Manrique-Saide P et al. Ecological, biological and social dimensions of dengue vector breeding in five urban contexts of Latin America: a multi-country study. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:38.
4. Salvatella R. Aedes aegypti (Diptera, Culicidae) Notification of its presence in Uruguay [in Spanish]. Rev Med Uruguay 1997;13:118-21.
5. Willat G, Capdevila A, Martínez M et al. Evolution of Aedes aegypti in Uruguay, 1997-2003 [in Spanish]. Entomol vectores 2003;10:437-44.
6. Willat G, Basmadjián Y, Martínez M et al. Dispersion of Aedes aegypti in Uruguay [in Spanish]. Biol Acuát 2007;23:79.
7. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Dengue. Montevideo: Ministerio de Salud Pública; 2011. http://www.msp.gub.uy/publicacion/dengue [accessed 12 April 2011].
8. Basso C [editor]. Ecosystem approach for the prevention and control of the vector of dengue fever in Uruguay [in Spanish]. Montevideo: Universidad de la República; 2010.
9. San Martín JL, Brathwaite O, Zambrano B et al. The epidemiology of dengue in the Americas over the last three decades: a worrisome reality. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010;82:128-35.
10. García da Rosa E, Lairihoy R, Leivas JC et al. Monitoring of Aedes aegypti using oviposition traps [in Spanish]. Entomol vectores 2003;10:451-6.
11. Spiegel J, Bennett S, Hattersley L et al. Barriers and bridges to prevention and control of dengue: the need for a social-ecological approach. Eco Health 2005;2:273-90.
12. Wilcox B, Gubler D. Disease ecology and the global emergence of zoonotic pathogens. Environ Health Prev Med 2005;10:263-72.
13. Lebel J. Health: an ecosystem approach. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 2003.
14. Charron DF. Ecohealth research in practice. Innovative applications of an ecosystem approach to health. Ottawa: Springer-IDRC; 2012.
15. Christophers R. Aedes aegypti (L). The Yellow Fever Mosquito. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1960.
16. Focks DA, Haile DG, Daniela E et al. Dynamic life table model for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): analysis of the literature and model development. J Med Entomol 1993;30:1003-17.
17. Focks DA, Haile DG, Daniela E et al. Dynamic life table model for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): simulation results and validation. J Med Entomol 1993;30:1018-28.
18. Caffera RM. Atmospheric and climatic influence in dengue transmission In. Basso C. [editor]. Ecosystem approach for the prevention and control of the vector of dengue fever in Uruguay [in Spanish]. Montevideo: Universidad de la República, 2010; p. 149-68.
19. Basso C, Romero S, Caffera et al. Ecosystem assessment of the situation of the dengue vector in the city of Salto [in Spanish]. Montevideo: Universidad de la República; 2011.
20. Focks DA, Brenner RJ, Hayes J et al. Transmission thresholds for dengue in terms of Aedes aegypti pupae per person with discussion of their utility in source reduction efforts. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2000;62:11-8.
21. Souza-Santos R, Carvalho MS. Spatial analysis of Aedes aegypti larval distribution in the Ilha do Governador neighborhood of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [in Portuguese]. Cad Saude Publica 2000;16:31-42.
22. Getis A, Morrison AC, Gray K et al. Characteristics of the spatial pattern of the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti, in Iquitos, Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2003;69:494-505.
23. Focks DA. A Reviewof Entomological Sampling Methods and Indicators for dengue Vectors. Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), UNICEF, UNDP, World Bank, World Health Organization; 2003. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/TDR_IDE_DEN_03.1.pdf [accessed 12 June 2014].
24. Tun-Lin W, Lenhart A, Nam VS et al. Reducing costs and operational constraints of dengue vector control by targeting productive breeding places: a multi-country non-inferiority cluster randomized. Trop Med Int Health 2009;14:1143-53.
25. Arunachalam N, Tana S, Espino F et al. Eco-bio-social determinants of dengue vector breeding: a multicountry study in urban and periurban Asia. Bull World Health Organ 2010;88:173-84.
26. Mogyorosy Z, Smith PC. The main methodological issues in costing health care services-a literature review. York: Centre for Health Economics; 2005.
27. Armien B, Arredondo J, Carabali M et al. Costing dengue cases and outbreaks: a guide to current practices and procedures. Baltimore: International Vaccine Access Center; 2012. http://www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/ivac/projects/costing-Dengue-casesoutbreaks-guidelines.pdf [accessed 12 August 2013].
28. Johns B, Baltussen R, Hutubessy R. Programme costs in the economic evaluation of health interventions. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2003;1:1.
29. Draper AK, Hewitt G, Rifkin S. Chasing the dragon: developing indicators for the assessment of community participation in health programmes. Soc Sci Med 2010;71:1102-9.