Controllable synthesis porous Ag2CO3 nanorods for efficient photocatalysis

Nanoscale Research Letters

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Guo, Shenghui ^a,b,c   Bao, Jianxing ^a,b,c   Hu, Tu ^a,b,c   Zhang, Libo ^a,b,c   Yang, Li ^a,b,c   Peng, Jinhui ^a,b,c   Jiang, Caiyi ^a,b,c  

^a KUNMING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b NATIONAL LOCAL JOINT LABORATORY OF ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF MICROWAVE ENERGY AND EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

Author keywords

Crystal growth; Photocatalysis; Porous nanorods; Silver carbonate

Indexed keywords

CRYSTAL GROWTH; GAS ADSORPTION; HIGH RESOLUTION TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; NANORODS; PHOTOCATALYSIS; PHOTOCATALYTIC ACTIVITY; PHOTODEGRADATION; RHODIUM COMPOUNDS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SODIUM BICARBONATE;

CONTROLLABLE SYNTHESIS; CRYSTALLINE PHASE; ELECTRON-HOLE SEPARATION; MORPHOLOGY AND SIZE; NITROGEN ADSORPTION DESORPTION; SILVER CARBONATE; SOLUTION REACTION; VISIBLE-LIGHT IRRADIATION;

SILVER COMPOUNDS;

EID: 84928661911     PISSN: 19317573     EISSN: 1556276X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s11671-015-0892-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Zhang H, Chen G, Bahnemann DW. Photoelectrocatalytic materials for environmental applications. J Mater Chem. 2009;19:5089–121.
2. Teoh WY, Scott JA, Amal R. Progress in heterogeneous photocatalysis: from classical radical chemistry to engineering nanomaterials and solar reactors. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012;3:629–39.
3. Kamat PV, Bisquert J. Solar fuels. Photocatalytic hydrogen generation. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:14873–5.
4. Fujishima A, Rao TN, Tryk DA. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. J Photoch Photobio C. 2000;1:1–21.
5. Chen X, Mao SS. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem Rev. 2007;107:2891–959.
6. 2 nanotubes and other ordered oxide nanostructures. Small. 2012;8:3073–103.
7. Fresno F, Portela R, Suárez S, Coronado JM. Photocatalytic materials: recent achievements and near future trends. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2:2863–84.
8. 2 nanowire membranes sensitized with CdS quantum dots for the enhancement of photocatalytic performance. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:1–6.
9. 2-coated nanostructures for dye photo-degradation in water. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:1–7.
10. 2 doped with Ca-Ce-W in the degradation of acid red 1 under visible light irradiation. Desalin Water Treat. 2013;52:5639–51.
11. 2 (M = Al, Ga, In): effects of chemical compositions, crystal structures, and electronic structures. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:1560–6.
12. 3 under visible and UV light irradiation. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:12483–8.
13. 3. Dalton T. 2009;8519–24.
14. 3 prepared by sol–gel method. Mater Res Bull. 2013;48:1618–26.
15. 3: hydrothermal synthesis, photocatalytic activity and self-stable mechanism study. Appl Catal B Environ. 2012;123:78–83.
16. 4 photocatalyst for fast degradation of PCP-Na under visible light irradiation. Catal Commun. 2012;26:63–7.
17. 4. Beilstein J Nanotech. 2014;5:658–66.
18. 3 sub-microparticles with high visible-light photocatalytic activity. Micro Nano Lett. 2014;9:417–20.
19. 4 visible-light-responsive photocatalyst: facile synthesis and exceptional photocatalytic performance. Chem Commun. 2013;49:5498–500.
20. 2 (M = Al, Ga, In) prepared via a hydrothermal method. Appl Catal B Environ. 2009;89:551–6.
21. 4 semiconductor with ultrahigh activity in photodegradation of organic dyes: insights into the photosensitization mechanism. RSC Adv. 2014;4:2151–4.
22. Xu C, Liu Y, Huang B, Li H, Qin X, Zhang X, et al. Preparation, characterization, and photocatalytic properties of silver carbonate. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;257:8732–6.
23. 3 photocatalyst with highly visible-light-responsive reactivity. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:15519–24.
24. 3 photocatalyst with universal photodegradation performances: Simple synthesis, reaction mechanism and first-principles study. Appl Catal B Environ. 2013;134:46–54.
25. Pan JH, Dou H, Xiong Z, Xu C, Ma J, Zhao XS. Porous photocatalysts for advanced water purifications. J Mater Chem. 2010;20:4512–28.
26. Li Y, Fu ZY, Su BL. Hierarchically structured porous materials for energy conversion and storage. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22:4634–67.
27. Wang JL, Wang C, Lin W. Metal-organic frameworks for light harvesting and photocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2012;2:2630–40.
28. Chi B, Zhao L, Jin T. One-step template-free route for synthesis of mesoporous N-doped titania spheres. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:6189–93.
29. Dollimore D, Spooner P, Turner A. The BET method of analysis of gas adsorption data and its relevance to the calculation of surface areas. Surf Tech. 1976;4:121–60.
30. Boissière C, van der Lee A, El Mansouri A, Larbot, A, Prouzet, E. A double step synthesis of mesoporous micrometric spherical MSU-X silica particles. Chem Commun. 1999. 2047–8.
31. Martines MU, Yeong E, Persin M, Larbot A, Voorhout WF, Kübel C, et al. Hexagonal mesoporous silica nanoparticles with large pores and a hierarchical porosity tested for HPLC. Comptes Rendus Chimie. 2005;8:627–34.
32. + hybrid precursors with porosity. Appl Catal B Environ. 2014;144:394–407.
33. 4 nanospheres. J Alloy Compd. 2015;622:695–702.
34. Zeng X, Zhou B, Gao Y, Wang C, Li S, Yeung CY, et al. Structural dependence of silver nanowires on polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) chain length. Nanotechnology. 2014;25:495601.
35. 2O hollow spheres and their wavelength-dependent visible photocatalytic activities using LED lamps as cold light sources. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:1–8.
36. 3 heterostructures with high visible light efficiency in photocatalytic degradation of pollutants. Adv Mater. 2014;26:892–8.
37. 3 and its photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2014;4:9139–47.
38. 3 (X = Cl, I) composites and their efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity. J Alloy Compd. 2015;622:347–57.
39. 14 nanohybrids with improved visible light photocatalytic activity. Dalton T. 2014;43:10566–73.
40. Gaarenstroom SW, Winograd N. Initial and final state effects in the ESCA spectra of cadmium and silver oxides. J Chem Phys. 1977;67:3500–6.