Long-lasting insecticide-treated house screens and targeted treatment of productive breeding-sites for dengue vector control in Acapulco, Mexico

Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 106-115

  Che Mendoza, Azael ^a   Guillermo May, Guillermo ^b   Herrera Bojórquez, Josué ^b   Barrera Pérez, Mario ^b   Dzul Manzanilla, Felipe ^c   Gutierrez Castro, Cipriano ^c   Arredondo Jiménez, Juan I ^d   Sánchez Tejeda, Gustavo ^d   Vazquez Prokopec, Gonzalo ^f   Ranson, Hilary ^e   Lenhart, Audrey ^g   Sommerfeld, Johannes ^h   McCall, Philip J ^e   Kroeger, Axel ^h   Manrique Saide, Pablo ^b  

^a Secretaria de Salud de Yucatan   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE YUCATÁN   (Mexico)

^c Servicios Estatales de Salud de Guerrero ^*  (Mexico)

^d SECRETARÍA DE SALUD   (Mexico)

^e LIVERPOOL SCHOOL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^f EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^h WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Aedes aegypti; Control; Dengue; LLIS; Mexico; Targeted treatment

Indexed keywords

LARVICIDAL AGENT; INSECTICIDE;

ADOLESCENT; AEDES AEGYPTI; ARTICLE; BED NET; BREEDING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DENGUE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; INFESTATION; LARVAL STAGE; LIFE CYCLE STAGE; LONG LASTING INSECTICIDAL NET SCREEN; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; MEXICO; PUPA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TARGETED TREATMENT; URBAN AREA; VECTOR CONTROL; AEDES; ANIMAL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY CARE; DENGUE VIRUS; DISEASE CARRIER; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HEALTH; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MOSQUITO; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARASITOLOGY; PATHOGENICITY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; SEASON; SENTINEL SURVEILLANCE; WATER SUPPLY;

AEDES AEGYPTI;

AEDES; ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DENGUE; DENGUE VIRUS; DISEASE RESERVOIRS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INSECTICIDE-TREATED BEDNETS; INSECTICIDES; MEXICO; MOSQUITO CONTROL; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; SEASONS; SENTINEL SURVEILLANCE; URBAN HEALTH; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 84928654367     PISSN: 00359203     EISSN: 18783503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/tru189     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Tun-Lin W, Lenhart A, Nam VS et al. Reducing costs and operational constraints of dengue vector control by targeting productive breeding places: a multicountry non-inferiority cluster randomized trial. Trop Med Int Health 2009;14:1143-53.
2. Morrison AC, Zielinski-Gutierrez E, Scott TW et al. Defining challenges and proposing solutions for control of the virus vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS Med 2008;5(3):e68.
3. Kroeger A, Lenhart A, OchoaMet al. Effective control of dengue vectors with curtains and water container covers treated with insecticide in Mexico and Venezuela: cluster randomised trials. BMJ 2006;332:1247-52.
4. McCall PJ, Kittayapong P. Control of Dengue Vectors: Tools and Strategies. In: Report of the Scientific Working Group Meeting on Dengue, Geneva, 15 October 2006. Geneva: WHO/TDR 2007; p. 110-9.
5. Vanlerberghe V, Villegas E, Oviedo M et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of insecticide treated materials for household level dengue vector control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011; 5(3):e994.
6. Rizzo N, Gramajo R, Cabrera-Escobar M et al. Dengue vector management using insecticide treated materials and targeted interventions on productive breeding-sites in Guatemala. BMC Public Health 2012;2:931.
7. WHO. Guidelines for Laboratory and Field Testing of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets. WHO/HTM/NTD/WHOPES/2013.1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
8. Focks D, Alexander N. Multicountry study of Aedes aegypti pupal productivity survey methodology: findings and recommendations. (TDR/IDE/Den/06.1). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
9. Maciel-de-Freitas R, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R. Does targeting key-containers effectively reduce Aedes aegypti population density? Trop Med Int Health 2011;16:965-73.
10. Sommerfeld J, Kroeger A. Eco-bio-social research on dengue in Asia: a multicountry study on ecosystem and community-based approaches for the control of dengue vectors in urban and peri-urban Asia. Pathog Glob Health 2012;106:428-35.
11. Manrique-Saide P, Che-Mendoza A, Barrera-Pérez M et al. Long-lasting insecticide treated screens significantly reduce indoor Aedes aegypti presence and abundance in Acapulco, Mexico. Emerg Infect Diseases [Forthcoming 2015].
12. Quintero J, Brochero H, Manrique-Saide P et al. Ecological, biological and social dimensions of dengue vector breeding in five urban settings of Latin America: a multi-country study. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:38.
13. SINAVE. Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica. http://www.sinave.gob.mx/ [accessed 12 December 2013].
14. Hernández-Ávila JE, Rodríguez MH, Santos-Luna R et al. Nation-wide, web-based, geographic information system for the integrated surveillance and control of dengue fever in Mexico. PLoS One 2013;6;8(8):e70231.
15. Manrique-Saide P, Che-Mendoza A, Rizzo N et al. Operational guide for assessing the productivity of Aedes aegypti breeding sites. Geneva: TDR/World Health Organization; 2011.
16. Seng CM, Setha T, Nealon J et al. The effect of long-lasting insecticidal water container covers on field populations of Aedes aegypti (L.) mosquitoes in Cambodia. J Vector Ecol 2008;33:333-41.
17. Tsunoda T, Kawada H, Huynh TT et al. Field trial on a novel control method for the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti by the systematic use of Olysetw Net and pyriproxyfen in Southern Vietnam. Parasit Vectors 2013;6:6.
18. Lenhart A, Orelus N, Maskill R et al. Insecticide-treated bednets to control dengue vectors: preliminary evidence from a controlled trial in Haiti. Trop Med lnt Health 2008;13:56-67.
19. Lenhart A, Trongtokit Y, Alexander N et al. A cluster-randomized trial of insecticide-treated curtains for dengue vector control in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2013;88:254-9.
20. Vanlerberghe V, Trongtokit Y, Jirarojwatana S et al. Coveragedependent effect of insecticide-treated curtains for dengue control in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2013;89:93-8.
21. Lindsay SW, Emerson PM, Charlwood JD. Reducing malaria by mosquito-proofing houses. Trends Parasitol 2002;18:510-4.
22. Kirby MJ, Ameh D, Bottomley C et al. Effect of two different house screening interventions on exposure to malaria vectors and on anaemia in children in The Gambia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:998-1009.
23. Ogoma SB, Lwetoijera DW, Ngonyani H et al. Screening mosquito house entry points as a potential method for integrated control of endophagic filariasis, arbovirus and malaria vectors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2010;4(8):e773.
24. Horstick O, Runge-Ranzinger S, Nathan MB et al. Dengue vector-control services: howdo they work? A systematic literature reviewand country case studies. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2010;104:379-86.
25. Garelli FM, Espinosa MO,Weinberg D et al. Water use practices limit the effectiveness of a temephos-based Aedes aegypti larval control program in northern Argentina. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011;5(3):e991.
26. Beaty B, Bernhardt S, Black Wet al. Novel Strategies to Control Aedes aegypti and Dengue. In: Atkinson PW (editor). Vector Biology, Ecology and Control. Springer: The Netherlands; 2009; p. 99-111.
27. Lindsay SW, Jawara M, Paine K et al. Changes in house design reduce exposure to malaria mosquitoes. Trop Med Int Health 2003;8:512-7.
28. Kirby M, Green C, Milligan P et al. Risk factors for house-entry by malaria vectors in a rural town and satellite villages in The Gambia. Malar J 2008;7:2.
29. Walker N. The hygienic house: mosquito-proofing with screens Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010;83:963-4.
30. Kirby MJ, Bah P, Jones CO et al. Social acceptability and durability of two different house screening interventions against exposure to malaria vectors, Plasmodium falciparum infection, and anemia in children in the Gambia, West Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010;83:965-72.