A model to determine OWA weights and its application in energy technology evaluation

International Journal of Intelligent Systems

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 798-806

  Wu, Lifeng ^a   Liu, Sifeng ^a,b   Yang, Yingjie ^b  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

^b DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; INTERVAL NUMBER; ITS APPLICATIONS; LATENT INFORMATION; ORDERED WEIGHTED AVERAGING;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84928596498     PISSN: 08848173     EISSN: 1098111X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/int.21712     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kon Lee S, Mogi G, Wook Kim J,. Decision support for prioritizing energy technologies against high oil prices: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. J Loss Prevention Process Ind 2009; 22 (6): 915-920.
2. Haralambopoulos DA, Polatidis H,. Renewable energy projects: structuring a multicriteria group decision-making framework. Renew Energy 2003; 28: 961-973.
3. Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M,. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning-a review. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 2004; 8: 365-381.
4. Wang J-J, Jing Y-Y, Zhang C-F, Zhao J-H,. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 2009; 13: 2263-2278.
5. Scott, JA, Ho, W, Dey PK,. A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems. Energy 2012; 42: 146-156.
6. Aydin NY, Kentel E, Duzgun S,. GIS-based environmental assessment of wind energy systems for spatial planning: a case study from Western Turkey. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 2010; 14: 364-373.
7. Supriyasilp T, Pongput K, Boonyasirikul T,. Hydropower development priority using MCDM method. Energy Policy 2009; 37: 1866-1875.
8. Doukas H, Patlitzianas KD, Psarras J,. Supporting sustainable electricity technologies in Greece using MCDM. Resources Policy 2006; 31: 129-136.
9. Loken E, Botterud A, Holen AT,. Use of the equivalent attribute technique in multi-criteria planning of local energy systems. Eur J Oper Res 2009; 197 (4): 1075-1083.
10. Begic F, Afgan NH,. Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system-Bosnian case. Energy 2007; 32: 1979-1985.
11. Dinca C, Badea A, Rousseaux P, Apostol T,. A multi-criteria approach to evaluate the natural gas energy systems. Energy Policy 2007; 35: 5754-5765.
12. Yager RR,. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet B 1988; 18: 183-190.
13. Badea AC, Rocco SCM, Tarantola S, Bolado R,. Composite indicators for security of energy supply using ordered weighted averaging. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2011; 96 (6): 651-662.
14. Al-Yahyai S, Charabi Y, Gastli A, AI-Badi A,. Wind farm land suitability indexing using multi-criteria analysis. Renew Energy 2012; 44: 80-87.
15. Wang Z, Wang L, Dounis AI, Yang R,. Multi-agent control system with information fusion based comfort model for smart buildings. Appl Energy 2012; 99: 247-254.
16. Suo MQ, Li YP, Huang GH,. Multi criteria decision making under uncertainty: an advanced ordered weighted averaging operator for planning electric powers ystems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2012; 25: 72-81.
17. Mata F, Prez LG, Zhou S-M, Chiclana F,. Type-1 OWA methodology to consensus reaching processes in multi-granular linguistic contexts. Knowl-Based Syst 2014; 58: 11-22.
18. Liu H, Cai J, Martinez L,. The importance weighted continuous generalized ordered weighted averaging operator and its application to group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 2013; 48: 24-36.
19. Ahn BS,. Preference relation approach for obtaining OWA operators weights. Int J Approx Reason 2008; 47 (2): 166-178.
20. Xu Z,. An overview of methods for determining OWA weights. Int J Intell Syst 2005; 20: 843-865.
21. Sadiq R, Tesfamariam S,. Probability density functions based weights for ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators: an example of water quality indices. Eur J Oper Res 2007; 182: 1350-1368.
22. Liu X,. Models to determine parameterized ordered weighted averaging operators using optimization criteria. Inform Sci 2012; 190: 27-55.
23. Zhou L, Chen H, Liu J,. Generalized weighted exponential proportional aggregation operators and their applications to group decision making. Appl Math Model 2012; 36: 4365-4384.
24. Wang Y-M, Parkan C,. A minimax disparity approach for obtaining OWA operator weights. Inform Sci 2005; 175 (1-2): 20-29.
25. Wang Y-M, Luo Y, Liu X,. Two new models for determining OWA operator weights. Comput Ind Eng 2007; 52: 203-209.
26. Chang C-J, Der-Chiang Li, Wen-LiDai, Chen C-C,. A latent information function to extend domain attributes to improve the accuracy of small-data-set forecasting. Neurocomputing 2014; 129: 343-349.
27. Xu ZS, Da QL,. The uncertain OWA operator. Int J Intell Syst 2002; 17: 569-575.
28. Xu Z,. Dependent uncertain ordered weighted aggregation operators. Inform Fusion 2008; 9 (2): 310-316.
29. Ahn BS,. The uncertain OWA aggregation with weighting functions having a constant level of orness. Int J Intell Syst 2006; 21: 469-483.
30. Zeng S,. Decision making with the uncertain IMOWAD operator. Kybernetes 2013; 42 (5): 785-799.
31. Song P, Liang J, Qian Y,. A two-grade approach to ranking interval data. Knowl-Based Syst 2012; 27: 234-244.
32. Burton J, Hubacek K,. Is small beautiful? A multicriteria assessment of small-scale energy technology applications in local governments. Energy Policy 2007; 35: 6402-6412.