Psychometric evaluation of the stroke impact scale 3.0

Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 229-241

  Vellone, Ercole ^a   Savini, Serenella ^a   Fida, Roberta ^b   Dickson, Victoria Vaughan ^c   Melkus, Gail D'Eramo ^c   Carod Artal, Francisco Javier ^d,e   Rocco, Gennaro ^f   Alvaro, Rosaria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITAT INTERNACIONAL DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^e RAIGMORE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship   (Italy)

Author keywords

instrument validity and reliability; psychometrics; stroke survivors

Indexed keywords

AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISABILITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STROKE; SURVIVOR; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; SURVIVORS;

EID: 84928581077     PISSN: 08894655     EISSN: 15505049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000145     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Norrving B, Kissela B. The global burden of stroke and need for a continuum of care. Neurology. 2013;80(3 suppl 2): S5YS12.
2. Daniel K,Wolfe CD, BuschMA, McKevitt C. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(6):e431Ye440.
3. Nichols M, Townsend N, Luengo-Fernandez R, et al. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2012. Brussels, Belgium: European Heart Network and European Society of Cardiology; 2012.
4. Ovbiagele B, Goldstein LB, Higashida RT, et al. Forecasting the future of stroke in the United States: A policy statement from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:2361-2375.
5. Jonsson AC, Lindgren I, Hallstrom B, Norrving B, Lindgren A. Determinants of quality of life in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers. Stroke. 2005;36(4):803-808.
6. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care. 1992;30:473-481.
7. Bergner M, Bobbitt R, Pollard W, Martin D, Gilson B. The Sickness Impact Profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care. 1976;14:57-67.
8. Hunt S, McEwan T. The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illn. 1980;2:231-246.
9. The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28:551-558.
10. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999; 30(10):2131-2140.
11. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(7):950-963.
12. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke. 1999;30(7):1362-1369.
13. Hilari K, Lamping DL, Smith SC, Northcott S, Lamb A, Marshall J. Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(6):544-557.
14. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Keighley J. Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39(5):835-841.
15. Edwards B, O'Connell B. Internal consistency and validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0) and SIS-16 in an Australian sample. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(8):1127-1135.
16. Carod-Artal FJ, Coral LF, Trizotto DS, Moreira CM. The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version. Stroke. 2008;39(9): 2477-2484.
17. Geyh S, Cieza A, Stucki G. Evaluation of the German translation of the Stroke Impact Scale using Rasch analysis. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23(6):978-995.
18. BrownTA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2006.
19. Vellone E, Savini S, Barbato N, Carovillano G, Caramia M, Alvaro R. Quality of life in stroke survivors: first results from the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. Ann Ig. 2010;22(5):469-479.
20. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), II: psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247-263.
21. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-65.
22. Della PietraGL, Savio K,Oddone E,ReggianiM,Monaco F, LeoneMA. Validity and reliability of the Barthel index administered by telephone. Stroke. 2011;42(7):2077-2079.
23. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of the patients for the clinicians. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12: 189-198.
24. Cumming TB, Churilov L, Linden T, Bernhardt J. Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination are both valid cognitive tools in stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013;128(2):122-129.
25. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361-370.
26. Sagen U, Finset A, Moum T, et al. Early detection of patients at risk for anxiety, depression and apathy after stroke. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(1):80-85.
27. Sagen U, Vik TG, Moum T, Morland T, Finset A, Dammen T. Screening for anxiety and depression after stroke: comparison of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale. J Psychosom Res. 2009;67(4):325-332.
28. Kang HJ, Stewart R, Kim JM, et al. Comparative validity of depression assessment scales for screening poststroke depression. J Affect Disord. 2013;147(1-3):186-191.
29. Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989; 20:864-870.
30. Appelros P, Terent A. Characteristics of the National Institutes ofHealth Stroke Scale: results from a population-based stroke cohort at baseline and after one year. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17:21-27.
31. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1497-1500.
32. Cincura C, Pontes-Neto OM, Neville IS, et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: The role of cultural adaptation and structured interviewing. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(2):119-122.
33. Lawton M, Brody E. Assessment of older people: selfmaintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179-186.
34. Wang CY, Hu MH, Chen HY, Li RH. Self-reported mobility and instrumental activities of daily living: test-retest reliability and criterion validity. J Aging Phys Activ. 2012;20(2): 186-197.
35. Tanaka JS. Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation model. In: Long JS, Bollen KA, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993:10-39.
36. Hu L, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods. 1998;3(4):424-453.
37. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1-55.
38. BrowneMW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993:136-162.
39. BandalosDL. The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Modeling. 2002;9:78-102.
40. Nasser F, Takahashi T. The effect of using item parcels on ad hoc goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: An example using Sarason's Reactions to Tests. Appl Meas Educ. 2003;16:75-97.
41. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293-307.
42. Apolone G, Mosconi P,Ware J. Questionario sullo stato di salute SF-36. Verona, Italy: Guerini e Associati; 1997.
43. Barbaranelli C. Analisi dei dati. 2nd ed. Milan, Italy: LED; 2007.
44. Munro BH. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. 5th ed. Philadelphia PA: LippincottWilliams&Wilkins; 2005.
45. Goncalves RS,Gil JN,Cavalheiro LM, CostaRD, Ferreira PL. Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0).Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4): 691-696.
46. Combs SA, Dugan EL, Passmore M, et al. Balance, balance confidence, and health-related quality of life in persons with chronic stroke after body weight-supported treadmill training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(12):1914-1919.
47. BergstromAL, Eriksson G, von Koch L, ThamK. Combined life satisfaction of persons with stroke and their caregivers: Associations with caregiver burden and the impact of stroke. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:1.
48. Marsden D, Quinn R, Pond N, et al. A multidisciplinary group programme in rural settings for community-dwelling chronic stroke survivors and their carers: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(4):328-341.
49. ShaughnessyM,Michael K, Resnick B. Impact of treadmill exercise on efficacy expectations, physical activity, and stroke recovery. J Neurosci Nurs. 2012;44(1):27-35.
50. Palmcrantz S, Holmqvist LW, Sommerfeld DK, Tistad M, Ytterberg C, von Koch L. Differences between younger and older individuals in their use of care and rehabilitation but not in self-perceived global recovery 1 year after stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2012;321(1-2):29-34.
51. Shamliyan TA, Bliss DZ, Du J, Ping R, Wilt TJ, Kane RL. Prevalence and risk factors of fecal incontinence in communitydwelling men. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2009;9(4): E97YE110.
52. Alvaro R, Araco F,GravanteG, et al. Epidemiological aspects of urinary incontinence in a female population of an Italian region. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21: 873-883.
53. Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. An Introduction to Psychometrics. NewYork: Routledge, Taylor&Francis Publishers; 2011.
54. Hobart JC, Williams LS, Moran K, Thompson AJ. Quality of life measurement after stroke: uses and abuses of the SF-36. Stroke. 2002;33(5):1348-1356.
55. Sarker SJ, Rudd AG, Douiri A, Wolfe CD. Comparison of 2 extended activities of daily living scales with the Barthel Index and predictors of their outcomes: cohort study within the South London Stroke Register (SLSR). Stroke. 2012;43(5): 1362-1369.
56. Simeone S, Savini S, Cohen MZ, Alvaro R, Vellone E. The experience of stroke survivors three months after being discharged home: A phenomenological investigation. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. In press. doi: 10.1177/1474515114522886.
57. Waltz C, Strickland O, Lenz E. Measurement in Nursing andHealthResearch. 4th ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2010.