TOPSIS-Based Screening Method of Soil Remediation Technology for Contaminated Sites and its Application

Soil and Sediment Contamination

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 386-397

  Bai, Liping ^a   Luo, Yun ^b   Shi, Dengrong ^b   Xie, Xuefeng ^c   Liu, Li ^a   Zhou, Youya ^a   Yan, Zengguang ^a   Li, Fasheng ^a  

^a CHINESE RESEARCH ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b SHANGHAI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Water Resources Management Division of Baotou   (China)

Author keywords

AHP; contaminated sites; screening method; soil remediation technology; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CONTAMINATION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; IN SITU PROCESSING; ORE REDUCTION; REMEDIATION; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL POLLUTION; SOILS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); CHROMITE ORE PROCESSING RESIDUES; CONTAMINATED SITES; DECISION-MAKING METHOD; REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES; SCREENING METHODS; SOIL REMEDIATION; TOPSIS;

LAND RECLAMATION;

EID: 84928555620     PISSN: 15320383     EISSN: 15497887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15320383.2015.968915     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bardos, R. P., Mariotti, C., Marot, F., and Sullivan, T. 2001. Framework for decision support used in contaminated land management in Europe and North America. Land Contam. Reclamat. 9, 149–163.
2. Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., and Ignatius, J. 2012. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 13051–13069.
3. Carlon, C., Pizzol, L., Critto, A., and Marcomini, A. 2008. A spatial risk assessment methodology to support the remediation of contaminated land. Environ. Int. 34, 397–411.
4. CERCLA. 1980. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, U.S. Public Law 96–510.
5. Chen, T. Y. 2012. Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: Discussions on score functions and weight constraints. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 1848–1861.
6. Chen, Y., Li, K. W., and Liu, S. F. 2011. An OWA-TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 5205–5211.
7. Collan, M., Fedrizzi, M., and Luukka, P. 2013. A multi-expert system for ranking patents: An approach based on fuzzy pay-off distributions and a TOPSIS–AHP framework. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 4749–4759.
8. Critto, A., Cantarella, L., Carlon, C., Giove, S., Petruzzelli, G., and Marcomini, A. 2006. Decision support-oriented selection of remediation technologies to rehabilitate contaminated Sites. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2, 273–285.
9. EC (European Commission). 2002. Towards a thematic strategy for soil protection. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions. COM (2002) 179.
10. Giove, S., Brancia, A., Satterstrom, F. K., and Linkov, I. 2009. Decision support systems and environment: Role of MCDA. In: Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites, pp. 53–73 (Marcomini, A., Suter, G. W., and Critto, A., Eds.), New York: Springer.
11. Gu, Q. B., Guo, G. L., and Zhou, Y. Y. 2008. Classification, application and selection of contaminated site remediation technology: An overview. Res. Environ. Sci. 21, 197–202 (in Chinese).
12. Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., and Linkov, I. 2011. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Sci. Total. Environ. 409, 3578–3594.
13. Interim Dutch Soil Cleanup Act. 1983. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Netherlands.
14. Jun, K. S., Chung, E. S., Kim, Y. G., and Kim, Y. 2013. A fuzzy multi-criteria approach to flood risk vulnerability in South Korea by considering climate change impacts. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 1003–1013.
15. Kelemenis, A., Ergazakis, K., and Askounis, D. 2011. Support managers’ selection using an extension of fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 2774–2782.
16. Li, A. J., Quan, X. C., and Wang, Y. 2012. Selection of contaminated site soil remediation technology based on PROMETHEE. Chinese J. Environ. Eng. 6, 3767–3773 (in Chinese).
17. Li, M. Y. 2010. Problems existing in the environmental management of contaminated sites in China and their counter measures. Chinese Agr. Sci. Bull. 26, 338–342 (in Chinese).
18. Linkov, I., Varghese, A., Jamil, S., Seager, T., Kiker, G., and Bridges, T. 2004. Multi-criteria decision analysis: A framework for structuring remedial at contaminated sites. In: Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making, pp. 15–54 (Linkov, I., and Ramadan, A., Eds.) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
19. Luo, C. Z., Yi, A. H., and Zhang, Z. Q. 2008. Remediation technology selection for POPs contaminated sites. Chinese J. Environ. Eng. 2, 569–573 (in Chinese).
20. Mahdavi, I., Mahdavi-Amiri, N., Heidarzade, A., and Nourifar, R. 2008. Designing a model of fuzzy TOPSIS in multiple criteria decision making. Appl. Math. Comput. 206, 607–617.
21. NRTEE (National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy). 2003. Cleaning up the Past, Building the Future: A National Brownfield Redevelopment Strategy for Canada, NRTEE. Ottawa, Canada.
22. Peng, J. F., Song, Y. H., Yuan, P., Cui, X. Y., and Qiu, G. L. 2009. The remediation of heavy metals contaminated sediment. J. Hazard. Mater. 161, 633–640.
23. Pires, A., Chang, N. B., and Martinho, G. 2011. An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setúbal Peninsula, Portugal. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 56, 7–21.
24. Roghanian, E., Rahimi, J., and Ansari, A. 2010. Comparison of first aggregation and last aggregation in fuzzy group TOPSIS. Appl. Math. Model. 34, 3754–3766.
25. Schädler, S., Morio, M., Bartke, S., Rohr-Zänker, R., and Finkel, M. 2011. Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 827–837.
26. Swartjes, F. A., Rutgers, M., Lijzen, J. P. A., Janssen, P. J. C. M., Otte, P. F., Wintersen, A., Brand, E., and Posthuma, L. 2012. State of the art of contaminated site management in The Netherlands: Policy framework and risk assessment tools. Sci. Total Environ. 427-428, 1–10.
27. Wang, T. C., and Lee, H. D. 2009. Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 8980–8985.
28. Yang, A. L., Huang, G. H., Qin, X. S., and Fan, Y. R. 2012. Evaluation of remedial options for a benzene-contaminated site through a simulation-based fuzzy-MCDA approach. J. Hazard. Mater. 213-214, 421–433.
29. Yao, Z., Li, J., Xie, H., and Yu, C. 2012. Review on remediation technologies of soil contaminated by heavy metals. Procedia Environ. Sci. 16, 722–729.
30. Yoon, K. P., and Hwang, C. 1995. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction,. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.