Support of multiple sinks via a virtual root for the RPL routing protocol

Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Volumn 2014, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Carels, David ^a   Derdaele, Niels ^a   Poorter, Eli De ^a   Vandenberghe, Wim ^a   Moerman, Ingrid ^a   Demeester, Piet ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Multi sink; Routing; RPL; Virtual DODAG root; WSN

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; LOW POWER ELECTRONICS; NETWORK ROUTING; POWER MANAGEMENT (TELECOMMUNICATION); ROUTING PROTOCOLS; TESTBEDS; WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS;

LOSSY NETWORKS; MULTI-SINK; OPTIMAL POSITION; PERFORMANCE TESTS; POSITIONING ALGORITHMS; ROUTING; SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT; VIRTUAL DODAG ROOT;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS;

EID: 84928546045     PISSN: 16871472     EISSN: 16871499     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1687-1499-2014-91     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Jie Lian KN, Agnew GB: Data capacity improvement of wireless sensor networks using non-uniform sensor distribution.Int. J. Distributed Sensor Netw 2006,2(2):121–145. 10.1080/15501320500201276
2. Li J, Ji S, Jin H, Ren Q: Routing in multi-sink sensor networks based on gravitational field. In Proceedings of International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems, ICESS ‘08. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA; 29–31 July 2008:368–375.
3. Kim H, Seok Y, Choi N, Choi Y, Kwon T: Optimal multi-sink positioning and energy-efficient routing in wireless sensor networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) vol. 3391,. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg; 2005.
4. Oyman EI, Ersoy C: Multiple sink network design problem in large scale wireless sensor networks. In 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Paris, 20–24 June 2004; 3663–3667.
5. Flathagen J, Kure O, Engelstad PE: Constrained-based multiple sink placement for wireless sensor networks. In 2011 IEEE 8th International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (MASS). Valencia, 17–22 October 2011; 783–788.
6. Bogdanov A, Maneva E, Riesenfeld S: Power-aware base station positioning for sensor networks. In Twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, INFOCOM. Hong Kong, 7–11 March 2004;
7. Hartigan JA: Clustering Algorithms. Wiley, New York; 1975.
8. Vincze Z, Vida R, Vidacs A: Deploying multiple sinks in multi-hop wireless sensor networks. In IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Services. Istanbul; 15–20 July 2007:55–63.
9. Safa H, Moussa M, Artail H: An energy efficient genetic algorithm based approach for sensor-to-sink binding in multi-sink wireless sensor networks.Wireless Network 2014,20(2):177–196. 10.1007/s11276-013-0600-2
10. Gandham SR, Dawande M, Prakash R, Venkatesan S: Energy efficient schemes for wireless sensor networks with multiple mobile base stations. In IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2003. GLOBECOM ‘03, (2003). San Franciso, 1–5 December 2003; 377–381.
11. Wang ZM, Basagni S, Melachrinoudis E, Petrioli C: Exploiting sink mobility for maximizing sensor networks lifetime. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS ‘05. Hawaii, 3–6 January 2005; 287–287.
12. Papadimitriou I, Georgiadis L: Maximum lifetime routing to mobile sink in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE SoftCOM. Split, Croatia, 15–17 September 2005;
13. Saad LB, Tourancheau B: Sinks mobility strategy in IPv6-based WSNs for network lifetime improvement. In International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS). Paris, 7–10 February 2011; 1–5.
14. Khan MI, Gansterer WN, Haring G: Static vs. mobile sink: the influence of basic parameters on energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks.Comput. Comm 2013,36(9):965–978. Reactive wireless sensor networks 10.1016/j.comcom.2012.10.010
15. Winter T, Thubert P, Brandt A, Hui J, Kelsey R, Levis P, Pister K, Struik R, Vasseur J, Alexander R: RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks.IETF 2012. Accessed 6 December 2013 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6550.txt
16. Levis P, Clausen T, Hui J, Gnawali O, Ko J: The trickle algorithm.IETF 2011. Accessed 4 April 2014 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6206.txt
17. Contiki: The open source OS for the internet of things, Accessed 7 April 2014 http://www.contiki-os.org
18. Romkey JL: Nonstandard for transmission of IP datagrams over serial lines: SLIP.IETF 1988. Accessed 21 October 2013 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1055.txt
19. Laboratoire de Conception et d’Intégration des Systèmes: development: tools [Wismote] 2012.http://wismote.org/doku.php?id=development:tools
20. Hinden R, Deering S: Internet protocol version 6 (IPv6) addressing architecture.IETF 2003. Accessed 6 May 2014 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3513.txt
21. An introduction to Cooja 2014.https://github.com/contiki-os/contiki/wiki/An-Introduction-to-Cooja
22. Ultra low power IEEE 802.15.4 compliant wireless sensor module 2006.http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~konrad/projects/shimmer/references/tmote-sky-datasheet.pdf
23. Wang Q, Hempstead M, Yang W: A realistic power consumption model for wireless sensor network devices. In 2006 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON ‘06. Reston, VA, 28 September 2006; 286–295.
24. Bouckaert S, Vandenberghe W, Jooris B, Moerman I, Demeester P: The w-iLab.t testbed. In Proceedings CD of the 6th International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities, TridentCom ‘10. Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering (ICST), (Ghent, Belgium); 2010.
25. CREW Project: w-iLab.t Documentation 2013.http://www.crew-project.eu/portal/wilabdoc