The transformation of the public sphere: Political authority, communicative freedom, and internet publics

Information Technology and Moral Philosophy

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 66-92

  Bohman, James ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928429446     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511498725.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Arrow, K. 1985. The economics of agency, in J. Pratt and R. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Principals and agents. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
2. Bohman, J. 1996. Democracy as inquiry, inquiry as democratic. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 590–607.
3. Bohman, J. 2004. Expanding dialogue: The public sphere, the Internet, and transnational democracy, in J. Roberts and N. Crossley (Eds.), After Habermas: Perspectives on the public sphere. London: Blackwell, pp. 131–155.
4. Cohen, J., and Sabel, C. 2003. Sovereignty and solidarity: EU and US, in J. Zeitlin and D. Trubek (Eds.), Governing work and welfare in the new economy: European and American experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Dahl, R. 1999. Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view, in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cord´on (Eds.), Democracy’s edges. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Dewey, J. 1988. The public and its problems, in John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1927 (Vol. 2). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
7. Dewey, J. 1991. Liberalism and social action, in John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1927 (Vol. 11). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
8. Dorf, M., and Sabel, C. 1996. The constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98, 2, 267–473.
9. Dryzek, J. 1996. Democracy in capitalist times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Ewig, C. 1999. Strengths and limits of the NGO Women’s Movement Model, Latin American Research Review, 34, 3, 75–102.
11. Fraser, N. 1989. Rethinking the public sphere, in C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 109–142.
12. Froomkin, M. 2003. Habermas@discourse.net: Towards a critical theory of Cyberspace. Harvard Law Review, 116, 3, 751–873.
13. Garnham, N. 1995. The mass media, cultural identity, and the public sphere in the modern world. Public Culture, 5, 243–271.
14. Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Hurley, S. 1989. Natural reasons. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Hurley, S. 1999. Rationality, democracy, and leaky boundaries, in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cord´on (Eds.), Democracy’s edges. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hutchings, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Kymlicka, W. 1999. Citizenship in an era of globalization, in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cord´on (Eds.), Democracy’s edges. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lessig, L. 1999. Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
21. Llewellyn, K. 1930. Agency, in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Volume I. New York: MacMillan.
22. Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Moravcsik, A. 1995. Explaining international human rights regimes: Liberal theory and Western Europe. European Journal of International Relations, 1, 2, 157–189.
24. O’Donnell, G. 1994. Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5, 55–69.
25. Page, B. 1995. Who deliberates? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Pettit, P. 2000. Democracy, electoral and contestatory, in I. Shapiro and S. Macedo (Eds), Designing democratic institutions. New York: New York University Press.
27. Ruggie, G. 1996. Constructing the world polity. London: Routledge.
28. Sabel, C., and Cohen, J. 1998. Directly-deliberative polyarchy, in Private governance, democratic constitutionalism, and supranationalism. Florence: European Commission, pp. 3–30.
29. Sassen, S. 1998. Globalization and its discontents. New York: New Press.
30. Shapiro, A. 1999. The control revolution. New York: New Century Books.
31. Shapiro, S. 1987. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 3, 623–658.
32. Smith, J., and Smythe, E. 2001. Globalization, citizenship and technology: The Multilateral Agreement on Investment meets the Internet, in F.Webster (Ed.), Culture and politics in the age of information. London: Routledge.
33. Soysal, Y. 1994. Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Thompson, J. 1995. Media and modernity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.