Country clubs, empiricism, blogs and innovation: The future of international intellectual property norm making in the wake of ACTA

Trade Governance in the Digital Age: World Trade Forum

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 323-343

  Gervais, Daniel ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928417753     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139136716.018     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Alston, P. ‘The “Not-a-Cat” Syndrome: Can the International Human Rights Regime Accommodate Non-State Actors?’ in Alston, P. (ed.), Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 3-36.
2. Bently, L. and Sherman, B. Intellectual Property Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).
3. Bernstein, G. ‘In the Shadow of Innovation’, Cardozo Law Review 31 (2010), 2257-2312.
4. Bodenhausen, G. H. C. Guide to the Paris Convention (Geneva: BIRPI, 1969).
5. Broad, W. J. and Dean, C. ‘Rivals’ Visions Dif er on Unleashing Innovation’, New York Times, 16 October 2008.
6. Correa, C.M. Implications of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health (Geneva: WHO, 2002).
7. De Beer, J. (ed.) Implementing the World Intellectual Property Organization’s Development Agenda (Ottawa: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2009).
8. Eisenberg, R. S. ‘Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use’, University of Chicago Law Review 56 (1989), 1017-1086.
9. Ficsor, F. Guide to the Copyright and Related Rights Treaties Administered by WIPO and Glossary of Copyright and Related Rights Terms (Geneva: WIPO, 2003).
10. Foley, E. ‘What Would Smart Visa Reform Look Like?’, Washington Independent, 27 August 2010.
11. Gervais, D. ‘Spiritual but Not Intellectual? The Protection of Sacred Intangible Traditional Knowledge’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 11 (2003), 467-495.
12. Gervais, D. ‘Intellectual Property, Trade and Development: The State of Play’, Fordham Law Review 74 (2005), 505-535.
13. Gervais, D. ‘Intellectual Property and Human Rights: Learning to Live Together’, in Torremans, P. (ed.), Intellectual Property and Human Rights (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2008).
14. Gervais, D. The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis, 3rd edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2008).
15. Gervais, D. ‘Of Clusters and Assumptions: Innovation as Part of a Full TRIPS Implementation’, Fordham Law Review 77:5 (2009), 2353-2377.
16. Gervais, D. ‘Introduction’, in Gervais, D. (ed.), Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights, 2nd edn (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2010), xix-xxx.
17. Gervais, D. and Nicholas-Gervais, V. ‘Intellectual Property in the Multilateral Agreement on Investment: Lessons to be Learned’, Journal of World Intellectual Property 2:2 (1999), 257-274.
18. Halbert, D. ‘Moralized Discourses: South Africa’s Intellectual Property Fight for Access to AIDS Drugs’, Seattle Journal for Social Justice 1 (2002), 257-287.
19. Heald, P. J. ‘Property Rights and the Efficient Exploitation of Copyrighted Rights: An Empirical Analysis of Public Domain and Copyrighted Fiction Best Sellers’, in Macmillan, F. (ed.), New Directions in Copyright Law, Vol. 6 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007), 74-111.
20. Helfer, L. R. ‘Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking’, Yale Journal of International Law 29 (2004), 1-83.
21. Katz, E. ‘Stopping the ACTA Juggernaut’, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 19 November 2009, http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/11/stopping-actajuggernaut
22. Kennedy, M. ‘When Will the Protocol Amending the TRIPS Agreement Enter Into Force?’ Journal of International Economic Law 13 (2010), 459-473.
23. Koestler, A. The Act of Creation (New York: Arkana, 1964).
24. Levine, D. S. ‘Transparency Soup: The ACTA Negotiating Process and “Black Box” Lawmaking’ (drat on file with author).
25. McCraw, T. K. Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2007).
26. Merges, R. P. and Nelson, R. R. ‘On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope’, Columbia Law Review 90 (1990), 839-916.
27. Nelson, A. E. ‘From Muddled to Medell í n: A Legal History of Sole Executive Agreement’, Arizona Law Review 51 (2010), 1035-1068.
28. Ream, R. A. ‘Nonprofit Commercialization under Bayh-Dole and the Academic Anticommons’, Case Western Reserve Law Review 58 (2008), 1343-1368.
29. Reich, R. Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy and Everyday Life (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007).
30. Schroeder, H. ‘Biotechnical Transfer: The Weaknesses and Strengths of Bayh-Dole’, Annals Health Law Advance Directive 18 (2008), 23-28.
31. Scotchmer, S. ‘Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and Patent Law’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1991), 29-41.
32. Sell, S. Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
33. Sherwood, R. M. ‘Some Things Cannot Be Legislated’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 10 (2002), 37-46.
34. Sherwood, R. M. ‘Global Prospects for the Role of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer’, IDEA 42 (2002), 27-36.
35. Strandburg, K. J. ‘Evolving Innovation Paradigms and the Global Intellectual Property Regime’, Connecticut Law Review 41 (2009), 861-920.
36. Tekeste Biadgleng, E. and Munoz Tellez, V. ‘The Changing Structure and Governance of Intellectual Property Protection’ South Centre Research Paper 15 (2008).
37. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, World Investment Report 2005: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of Research and Development (Geneva: UNCTAD, 2005).
38. World Intellectual Property Organization, World Patent Report: A Statistical Review (Geneva: WIPO, 2008).
39. Yu, P. K. ‘TRIPS and Its Discontents’, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 10 (2006), 369-410.
40. Yu, P. K. ‘The Objectives and Principles of the TRIPS Agreement’, Houston Law Review 46 (2009), 979-1046.