Current capacity to conduct ecologically sustainable forest management in northeastern canada reveals challenges for conservation of biodiversity

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 567-578

  Imbeau, Louis ^a   St Laurent, Martin Hugues ^b   Marzell, Lothar ^c   Brodeur, Vincent ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC EN ABITIBI TÉMISCAMINGUE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À RIMOUSKI   (Canada)

^c MINISTÈRE DES RESSOURCES NATURELLES ET DE LA FAUNE   (Canada)

^d de la Faune et des Parcs   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biodiversity indicators; Boreal forest; Caribou; Cumulative effects; Habitat loss

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS;

BIODIVERSITY INDICATORS; BOREAL FORESTS; CARIBOU; CUMULATIVE EFFECTS; HABITAT LOSS;

FORESTRY;

BOREAL FOREST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HABITAT CONSERVATION; RUMINANT; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; FORESTS;

CANADA;

RANGIFER TARANDUS;

EID: 84928386222     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: 12086037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0123     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Andrén, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos, 71(3): 355–366. doi:10.2307/3545823.
2. Bastille-Rousseau, G., Dussault, C., Couturier, S., Fortin, D., St-Laurent, M.-H., Drapeau, P., Dussault, C., and Bordeur, V. 2012. Sélection d'habitat du caribou forestier en forêt boréale québécoise. Ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement, de la Faune et des Parcs, Direction générale de l'expertise sur la faune et ses habitats, Québec.
3. Beauchesne, D, Jaeger, J.A.G., and St-Laurent, M.-H. 2013. Disentangling woodland caribou movements in response to clearcuts and roads across temporal scales. PLoS One, 8(11): e77514. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077514.
4. Beauchesne, D., Jaeger, J.A.G., and St-Laurent, M.-H. 2014. Thresholds in the capacity of boreal caribou to cope with cumulative disturbances: evidence from space use patterns. Biol. Conserv. 172: 190–199. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.03.002.
5. Bennett, A.F., and Radford, J.Q. 2009. Thresholds, incidence functions, and species-specific cues: response of woodland birds to landscape structure in south-eastern Australia. In Setting conservation targets in managed forest landscapes. Edited by M.-A. Villard and B.G. Jonsson. Cambridge University Press. pp. 161–184.
6. Berg, A., Ehnström, B., Gustafsson, L., Hallingbäck, T., Jonsell, M., and Weslien, J. 1994. Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat associations. Conserv. Biol. 8(3): 718–731. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030718.x.
7. Betts, M.G., and Villard, M.-A. 2009. Landscape thresholds in species occurrence as quantitative targets in forest management: generality in space and time? In Setting conservation targets in managed forest landscapes. Edited by M.-A. Villard and B.G. Jonsson. Cambridge University Press. pp. 185–206.
8. Betts, M.G., Forbes, G.J., and Diamond, A.W. 2007. Thresholds in songbird occurrence in relation to landscape structure. Conserv. Biol. 21(4): 1046–1058. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00723.x.
9. Boucher, Y., Arseneault, D., Sirois, L., and Blais, L. 2009. Logging pattern and landscape changes over the last century at the boreal and deciduous forest transition in eastern Canada. Landscape Ecol. 24(2): 171–184. doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9294-8.
10. Boudreault, C., Drapeau, P., Bouchard, M., St-Laurent, M.-H., Imbeau, L., and Bergeron, Y. 2015. Contrasting responses of epiphytic and terricolous lichens to variations in forest characteristics in northern boreal ecosystems. Can. J. For. Res. 45(5): 595–606 (this issue). doi:10.1139/cjfr-2013-0529.
11. Bryant, D., Nielsen, D., and Tangley, L. 1997. The last frontier forests: ecosystems and economies on the edge. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
12. Cheveau, M., Imbeau, L., Drapeau, P., and Bélanger, L. 2013. Marten space use and habitat selection in managed coniferous boreal forests of eastern Canada. J. Wildl. Manage. 77(4): 749–760. doi:10.1002/jwmg.511.
13. Crête, M., Drolet, B., Huot, J., Fortin, M.-J., and Doucet, G.J. 1995. Chronoséquence après feu de la diversité de mammifères et d'oiseaux au nord de la forêt boréale québécoise. Can. J. For. Res. 25(9): 1509–1518. doi:10.1139/x95-164.
14. Cyr, D., Gauthier, S., Bergeron, Y., and Carcaillet, C. 2009. Forest management is driving the eastern North American boreal forest outside its natural range of variability. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7: 519–524. doi:10.1890/080088.
15. Desrochers, A. 1995. Mésange à tête brune. In Atlas des oiseaux nicheurs du Québec. Edited by J. Gauthier and Y. Aubry. Association québécoise des groupes d'ornithologues, Société québécoise de protection des oiseaux, Service canadien de la faune, Montréal, Québec. pp. 738–739.
16. Dixon, R.D., and Saab, V.A. 2001. Black-backed Woodpecker (Picoides arcticus). In The birds of North America, No. 509. Edited by A. Poole and F. Gill. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
17. Drapeau, P., and Imbeau, L. 2006. Conséquences et risques potentiels inhérents à la récolte des forêts résiduelles laissées depuis 1988 au sein des grands parterres de coupe pour la faune associée aux forêts matures. Avis scientifique. Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Direction de l'aménagement de la faune, Bureau régional Abitibi-Témiscamingue.
18. Drapeau, P., Leduc, A., Bergeron, Y., Gauthier, S., and Savard, J.-P.L. 2003. Les communautés d'oiseaux des vieilles forêts de la pessière à mousses de la ceinture d'argile: problèmes et solutions face à l'aménagement forestier. For. Chron. 79(3): 531–540. doi:10.5558/tfc79531-3.
19. Drapeau, P., Leduc, A., and Bergeron, Y. 2009. Bridging ecosystem and multiple species approaches for setting conservation targets in managed boreal landscapes. In Setting conservation targets in managed forest landscapes. Edited by M.-A. Villard and B.G. Jonsson. Cambridge University Press. pp. 129–160.
20. Dussault, C., Pinard, V., Ouellet, J.-P., Courtois, R., and Fortin, D. 2012. Avoidance of roads and selection for recent cutovers by threatened caribou: fitnessrewarding or maladaptive behaviour? Proc. R. Soc. B, 279(1746): 4481–4488. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1700.
21. Dyer, S.J., O'Neill, J.P., Wasel, S.M., and Boutin, S. 2001. Avoidance of industrial development by woodland caribou. J. Wildl. Manage. 65(3): 531–542. doi:10.2307/3803106.
22. Dyer, S.J., O'Neill, J.P., Wasel, S.M., and Boutin, S. 2002. Quantifying barrier effects of roads and seismic lines on movements of female woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta. Can. J. Zool. 80(5): 839–845. doi:10.1139/z02-060.
23. Environment Canada. 2011. Scientific assessment to inform the identification of critical habitat for woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou), boreal population, in Canada: 2011 update. Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
24. Équipe de rétablissement du caribou forestier du Québec. 2013. Plan de rétablissement du caribou forestier (Rangifer tarandus caribou) au Québec — 2013–2023, produit pour le compte du ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec, Faune Québec.
25. Fahrig, L. 1997. Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J. Wildl. Manage. 61(3): 603–610. doi:10.2307/3802168.
26. Fahrig, L. 1998. When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival? Ecol. Model. 105(2–3): 273–292. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00163-4.
27. Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 487–515. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419.
28. Faille, G., Ouellet, J.-P., Dussault, C., Fortin, D., Courtois, R., St-Laurent, M.-H., and Dussault, C. 2010. Range fidelity: the missing link between caribou decline and habitat alteration? Biol. Conserv. 143(11): 2840–2850. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.001.
29. Festa-Bianchet, M., Ray, J.C., Boutin, S., Côté, S.D., and Gunn, A. 2011. Conservation of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in Canada: an uncertain future. Can. J. Zool. 89(5): 419–434. doi:10.1139/z11-025.
30. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). 2010. Key findings: newest information and knowledge about the world's forests and forestry. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010. Publication of the Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). Available from http://foris.fao.org/static/data/fra2010/KeyFindings-en.pdf [accessed 4 September 2014].
31. Gauthier, S., Raulier, F., Ouzennou, H., and Saucier, J.-P. 2015. Strategic analysis of forest vulnerability to risk related to fire: an example from the coniferous boreal forest of Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 45(5): 553–565 (this issue). doi:10.1139/cjfr-2014-0125.
32. Gouvernement du Québec. 2011. Loi sur les espèces menacées ou vulnérables, RLRQ c E-12.01. Available from http://canlii.ca/t/q1kv [accessed 21 December 2013].
33. Greenpeace, University of Maryland, World Resources Institute, and Transparent World. 2014. Intact forest landscapes: update and degradation from 2000–2013. Available from www.globalforestwatch.org [accessed 5 September 2014].
34. Hayward, G.D., and Hayward, P.H. 1993. Boreal owl. In The birds of North America, No. 63. Edited by A. Poole and F. Gill. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
35. Hayward, G.D., Hayward, P.H., and Garton, E.O. 1993. Ecology of boreal owls in the northern Rocky Mountains, U.S.A. Wildl. Monogr. 124: 1–59.
36. Hins, C., Ouellet, J.-P., Dussault, C., and St-Laurent, M.-H. 2009. Habitat selection by forest-dwelling caribou in managed boreal forest of eastern Canada: evidence of a landscape configuration effect. For. Ecol. Manage. 257(2): 636–643. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.049.
37. Imbeau, L., Savard, J.-P.L., and Gagnon, R. 1999. Comparing bird assemblages in successional black spruce stands originating from fire and logging. Can. J. Zool. 77(12): 1850–1860. doi:10.1139/z99-172.
38. Imbeau, L., Mönkkönen, M., and Desrochers, A. 2001. Long-term effects of forestry on birds of the eastern Canadian boreal forests: a comparison with Fennoscandia. Conserv. Biol. 15(4): 1151–1162. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041151.x.
39. Johnson, C. 2013. Identifying ecological thresholds for regulating human activity: effective conservation or wishful thinking? Biol. Conserv. 168: 57–65. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.012.
40. Jurdant, M., Bélair, J.L., Gerardin, V., and Ducruc, J.-P. 1977. L'inventaire du Capital-Nature. Méthode de classification et de cartographie écologique du territoire. Pêches et Environnement Canada, Direction générale des terres, Série de la classification écologique du territoire, n° 2.
41. Leblond, M., Frair, J., Fortin, D., Dussault, C., Ouellet, J.-P., and Courtois, R. 2011. Assessing the influence of resource covariates at multiple scales: an application to forest-dwelling caribou faced with intensive human activity. Landscape Ecol. 26(10): 1433–1446. doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9647-6.
42. Leblond, M., Dussault, C., and Ouellet, J.-P. 2013a. Impacts of human disturbance on large prey species: do behavioral reactions translate to fitness consequences? PLoS One, 8(9): e73695. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073695.
43. Leblond, M., Dussault, C., and Ouellet, J.-P. 2013b. Avoidance of roads by large herbivores and its relation to disturbance intensity. J. Zool. 289(1): 32–40. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00959.x.
44. Leblond, M., Dussault, C., and St-Laurent, M.-H. 2014. Development and validation of an expert-based habitat suitability model to support boreal caribou conservation. Biol. Conserv. 177: 100–108. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.016.
45. Leboeuf, A., Robitaille, A., Létourneau, J.-P., Morneau, C., and Bourque, L. 2012. Norme de cartographie écoforestière du programme d'inventaire écoforestier nordique (PIEN). Ministère des Ressources naturelles, Forêt Québec, Direction des inventaires forestiers.
46. Leclerc, M., Dussault, C., and St-Laurent, M.-H. 2012. Multiscale assessment of the impacts of roads and cutovers on calving site selection in woodland caribou. For. Ecol. Manage. 286: 59–65. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.010.
47. Leclerc, M., Dussault, C., and St-Laurent, M.-H. 2014. Behavioural strategies towards human disturbances explain individual performance in woodland caribou. Oecologia, 176(1): 297–306. doi:10.1007/s00442-014-3012-9.
48. Leonard, D.L., Jr. 2001. Three-toed Woodpecker (Picoides tridactylus). In The birds of North America, No. 588. Edited by A. Poole and F. Gill. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
49. Lesmerises, F., Dussault, C., Drapeau, P., and St-Laurent, M.-H. 2013a. Évaluation des impacts des lignes de transport d'énergie sur l'écologie spatiale du caribou forestier au Québec. Rapport présenté à Hydro-Québec, Rimouski (Québec).
50. Lesmerises, R., Ouellet, J.-P., Dussault, C., and St-Laurent, M.-H. 2013b. The influence of landscape matrix on isolated patch use by wide-ranging animals: conservation lessons for woodland caribou. Ecol. Evol. 3(9): 2880–2891. doi:10.1002/ece3.695.
51. Lindenmayer, D.B., Fischer, J., and Cunningham, R.B. 2005. Native vegetation cover thresholds associated with species responses. Biol. Conserv. 124(3): 311–316. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.038.
52. Lord, G., and Robitaille, A. 2013. Portrait biophysique du territoire d'étude. In Ministère des Ressources naturelles du Québec. Rapport du comité scientifique chargé d'examiner la limite nordique des forêts attribuables. MRN, Secteur des forêts. Annexe 4. 178 p.
53. Lowe, J., Pothier, D., Savard, J.-P.L., Rompré, G., and Bouchard, M. 2011. Snag characteristics and cavity-nesting birds in the unmanaged post-fire northeastern Canadian boreal forest. Silva Fennica, 45(1): 55–67. doi:10.14214/sf.31.
54. Mackey, B., DellaSala, D.A., Kormos, C., Lindenmayer, D., Kumpel, N., Zimmerman, B., Hugh, S., Young, V., Foley, S., Arsenis, K., and Watson, J.E.M. 2014. Policy options for the world's primary forests in multilateral environmental agreements. Conserv. Lett. In press. doi:10.1111/conl.12120.
55. Mansuy, N., Gauthier, S., Robitaille, A., and Bergeron, Y. 2010. The effects of surficial deposit–drainage combinations on spatial variations of fire cycles in the boreal forest of eastern Canada. Int. J. Wildl. Fire, 19(8): 1083–1098. doi: 10.1071/wf09144.
56. Ministère des Ressources naturelles du Québec. 2013. Rapport du comité scientifique chargé d'examiner la limite nordique des forêts attribuables. Secteur des forêts.
57. Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune. 2009. Norme de cartographie écoforestière; troisième inventaire écoforestier. Forêt Québec, Direction des inventaires forestiers.
58. Mönkkönen, M., and Reunanen, P. 1999. On critical thresholds in landscape connectivity: a management perspective. Oikos, 84(2): 302–305. doi:10.2307/3546725.
59. Radford, J.Q., Bennett, A.F., and Cheers, G.J. 2005. Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds. Biol. Conserv. 124(3): 317–337. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.039.
60. Rassi, P., Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., and Mannerkoski, I. (Editors). 2010. The 2010 Red List of Finnish Species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki, Finland.
61. Robitaille, A., Leboeuf, A., and Haché, M. 2013. Programme d'acquisition de connaissances. In Rapport du Comité scientifique chargé d'examiner la limite nordique des forêts attribuables. Ministère des Ressources naturelles du Québec, Secteur des forêts. Appendix 2, pp. 5–8.
62. Rompré, G., Boucher, Y., Bélanger, L., Côté, S., and Robinson, W.D. 2010. Conserving biodiversity in managed forest landscapes: the use of critical thresholds for habitat. For. Chron. 86(5): 589–596. doi:10.5558/tfc86589-5.
63. Rudolph, T.D., Drapeau, P., St-Laurent, M.-H., and Imbeau, L. 2012. Status of Woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in the James Bay Region of northern Quebec. Scientific report presented to the Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune du Québec and the Grand Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee), Montreal, Quebec.
64. Saucier, J.-P., Bergeron, J.-F., Grondin, P., and Robitaille, A. 1998. Les régions écologiques du Québec méridional: un des éléments du système hiérarchique de classification écologique du territoire mis au point par le ministère des Ressources naturelles du Québec. L'Aubelle, février–mars.
65. Saucier, J.-P., Robitaille, A., Grondin, P., Bergeron, J.-F., and Gosselin, J. 2011. Les régions écologiques du Québec méridional (4e version). Carte à l'échelle 1/1 250 000. Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune du Québec. Available from http://www.mffp.gouv.qc.ca/publications/forets/connaissances/carte-regions-ecologiques.pdf [accessed 21 December 2013].
66. Shaffer, F., and Alvo, R. 1995. Grimpereau brun. In Atlas des oiseaux nicheurs du Québec. Edited by J. Gauthier and Y. Aubry. Association québécoise des groupes d'ornithologues, Société québécoise de protection des oiseaux, Service canadien de la faune, Montréal (Québec). pp. 748–751.
67. St-Laurent, M.-H., Renaud, L.-A., Leblond, M., and Beauchesne, D. 2012. Synthèse des connaissances relatives aux impacts des routes sur l'écologie du caribou. Nat. Can. 136(2): 42–47. doi:10.7202/1009105ar.
68. Swift, T.L., and Hannon, S.J. 2010. Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss: a review of the concepts, evidence, and applications. Biol. Rev. 85(1): 35–53. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00093.x.
69. Tikkanen, O.-P., Martikainen, P., Hyvärinen, E., Junninen, K., and Kouki, J. 2006. Red-listed boreal forest species of Finland: associations with forest structure, tree species, and decaying wood. Ann. Zool. Fennici, 43(4): 373–383.
70. Villard, M.-A., and Jonsson, B.G. 2009. Tolerance of focal species to forest management intensity as a guide in the development of conservation targets. For. Ecol. Manage. 258: S142–S145. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.08.034.
71. Zhao, Q., Azeria, E.T., Le Blanc, M.-L., Lemaître, J., and Fortin, D. 2013. Landscapescale disturbances modified bird community dynamics in successional forest environment. PLoS One, 8(11): e81358. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081358.