Beyond the impact factor?

Evidence-Based Mental Health

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 33-35

  Fazel, Seena ^a   Lamsma, Jelle ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEUROSCIENCE; PUBLISHING;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; NEUROSCIENCES; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84928384081     PISSN: 13620347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/eb-2015-102087     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Igoumenou A, Ebmeier K, Roberts N, et al. Geographic trends of scientific output and citation practices in psychiatry. BMC Psychiatry 2014;14:332.
2. Mohammadi D. Health sciences rated highly in UK’s research assessment. Lancet 2014;385:14–16.
3. Research Excellence Framework. Key facts leaflet. (n.p.). Research Excellence Framework, 2014.
4. Thomas Reuters. The Thomson Reuters journal selection process. http://wokinfo.com/essays/journal-selection-process/ (accessed 13 Feb 2015).
5. Thomas Reuters. The Thomas Reuters Impact Factor. http://wokinfo.com/essays/impact-factor/ (accessed 13 Feb 2015).
6. Google Scholar. Google Scholar metrics: a vailable metrics. http://scholar.google.com/intl/nl/scholar/metrics.html#metrics (accessed 13 Feb 2015).
7. Elsevier. Journal and article metrics. http://www.elsevier.com/editors/ journal-and-article-metrics#scopus-journal-metrics (accessed 13 Feb 2015).
8. Ioannidis JPA, Belbasis L, Evangelou E. Fifty-year fate and impact of general medical journals. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e12531.
9. Salinas S, Munch SB. Where should I send it? Optimizing the submission decision process. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0115451.
10. Kwok R. Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark. Nature 2013;500:491–3.
11. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 2014;383:267–76.
12. Ioannidis JPA, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet 2014;383:166–75.
13. Clarke M, Hopewell S, Chalmers I. Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting. Lancet 2010;376:20–1.
14. Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet 2014;383:101–4.