Factors which can influence the quality related to cell viability of the umbilical cord blood units

Transfusion and Apheresis Science

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 90-98

  Dulugiac, Magda ^a,b   Horeanga, Ionela ^a   Torcatoru, Andrei ^a   Bardas, Alexandru ^a   Matei, Georgiana ^a   Zarnescu, Otilia ^b  

^a Regina Maria Central Stem Cells Bank   (Romania)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

Author keywords

Cell viability; Stem cells; Umbilical cord blood

Indexed keywords

CD34 ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; BLOOD BANK; CELL COUNT; CELL VIABILITY; CELL VOLUME; CRYOPRESERVATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; QUALITY CONTROL; SEDIMENTATION; TOTAL NUCLEATED CELL COUNT; UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD; BLOOD STORAGE; CELL SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FETUS BLOOD; HUMAN; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MALE; PROCEDURES;

BLOOD BANKS; BLOOD PRESERVATION; CELL SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FETAL BLOOD; HUMANS; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MALE;

EID: 84928324606     PISSN: 14730502     EISSN: 18781683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2014.08.019     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Gluckman E., Ruggeri A., Volt F., Cunha R., Boudjedir K., Rocha V. Milestones in umbilical cord blood transplantation. BJH 2011, 154:441-447.
2. Querol S., Gomez S.G., Pagliuca A., Torrabadella M., Madrigal J.A. Quality rather than quantity: the cord blood bank dilemma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010, 45:970-978.
3. McCullough J., McKenna D., Kadidlo D., Schierman T., Wagner J. Issues in the quality of umbilical cord blood stem cells for transplantation. Transfusion 2005, 45:832-841.
4. Tron de Bouchony E., Pelletier D., Alcalay D., Bruneau J., Predeau M., Brizard A., et al. Hematopoietic progenitor content of fetal cord blood collected using citrate-phosphate-dextrose: influence of holding temperature and delays. J Hematother 1993, 2:271-273.
5. Tsagias N., Kouzi-Koliakos K., Karagiannis V., Alamdari D.H., Koliakos G. Time and temperature before processing influence the recovery of umbilical cord blood hematopoietic progenitors. Transfusion 2007, 47:1550-1552.
6. Fry J.L., Ginger S.Q., Gomez S.G., Green M., Anderson S., Horder J., et al. Avoiding room temperature storage and delayed cryopreservation provide better postthaw potency in hematopoietic progenitor cell grafts. Transfusion 2013, 53:1834-1842.
7. Radke T.F., Barbosa D., Duggleby R.C., Saccardi R., Querol S., Kögler G. The assessment of parameters affecting the quality of cord blood by the appliance of the annexin V staining method and correlation with CFU assays. Stem Cells Int 2013, 2013:823912.
8. Broxmeyer H.E., Douglas G.W., Hangoc G., Cooper S., Bard J., English D., et al. Human umbilical cord blood as a potential source of transplantable hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989, 86:3828-3832.
9. Campos L., Roubi N., Guyotat D. Definition of optimal conditions for collection and cryopreservation of umbilical cord hematopoietic cells. Cryobiology 1995, 32:511-515.
10. Moledenhauer A., Wolf J., Habermann G., Genter G., Kiesewetter H., Salama A. Optimum storage conditions for cord blood-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells prior isolation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007, 40:837-842.
11. Bertolini F., Gibelli N., Lanza A., Cuomo A., delia Cuna G.R., Nelson E.J. Effects of storage temperature and time on cord blood progenitor cells. Transfusion 1998, 38:615-617.
12. Koenigbauer U.F., Burger S.R., McCullough J. Non-frozen preservation of umbilical cord blood. Transfusion 2002, 42:1383-1384.
13. Salge-Bartels U., Huber H.M., Kleiner K., Volkers P., Seitz R., Heiden M. Evaluation of quality parameters for cord blood donations. Transfus Med Hemother 2009, 36:317-324.
14. Rogers I., Sutherland D.R., Holt D., Macpate F., Lains A., Hollowell S., et al. Human UC-blood banking: impact of blood volume, cell separation and cryopreservation on leukocyte and CD34+ cell recovery. Cytotherapy 2001, 3:269-276.
15. Isoyama K., Yamada K., Hirota Y., Ishikawa K., Imai M., Notake Y. Study of the collection and separation of umbilical cord blood for use in hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. Int J Hematol 1996, 63:95-102.
16. Kurtzberg J., Cairo M.S., Fraser J.K., Baxter-Lowe L., Cohen G., Carter S.L., et al. Results of the Cord Blood Transplantation (COBLT) Study unrelated donor banking program. Transfusion 2005, 45:842-855.
17. Hubel A., Carlquist D., Clay M., McCullough J. Short-term liquid storage of umbilical cord blood. Transfusion 2003, 43:626-632.
18. Xiao M., Dooley D.C. Assessment of cell viability and apoptosis in human umbilical cord blood following storage. J Hematother Stem Cell Res 2003, 12:115-122.
19. Rubinstein P., Dobrila L., Rosenfield R.E., Adamson J.W., Migliaccio G., Migliaccio A., et al. Processing and cryopreservation of placental/umbilical cord blood for unrelated bone marrow reconstitution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:10119-10122.
20. Rubinstein P. Cord blood banking for clinical transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009, 44:635-642.
21. Yang H., Loutfy M.R., Mayerhofer S., Shuen P. Factors affecting banking quality of umbilical cord blood for transplantation. Transfusion 2011, 51:284-292.
22. Pereira-Cunha F.G., Duarte A.S., Costa F.F., Saad S.T., Lorand-Metze I., Luzo A.C. Viability of umbilical cord blood mononuclear cell subsets until 96 hours after collection. Transfusion 2013, 53:2034-2042.
23. Guidance for Industry Minimally manipulated, unrelated allogeneic placental/umbilical cord blood intended for hematopoietic reconstitution for specified indications. 2009.
24. Keeney M., Chin-Yee I., Weir K., Popma J., Nayar R., Sutherland D.R. Single platform flow cytometric absolute CD34+ cell counts based on the ISHAGE guidelines. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. Cytometry 1998, 34:61-70.
25. Solves P., Mirabet V., Planelles D., Blasco I., Roig R. Red blood cell depletion with semiautomated system or hydroxyethyl starch sedimentation for routine cord blood banking: a comparative study. Transfusion 2005, 45:867-873.
26. Prat-Arrojo I., Ponce-Verdugo L., Hernández-Lamas M.C., Rodríguez-Pena R., Antúnez C., Sánchez-Gordo F., et al. Influence on time to cryopreservation in umbilical cord blood units. IJCM 2011, 2:399-403.
27. Rubinstein P., Adamson J.W., Stevens E.C. The placental/ umbilical cord blood program of the New York blood center. A progress report. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999, 872:328-335.
28. Solomon M., Wofford J., Johnson C., Regan D. Factors influencing cord blood viability assessment before cryopreservation. Transfusion 2010, 50:820-830.
29. Pope B., Mitsakos K., Bilgin A., Hokin B., Grant R. Predicting overall viability of cord blood harvests. Transfusion 2012, 52:1079-1085.
30. Reboredo N.M., Díaz A., Castro A., Villaescusa R.G. Collection, processing and cryopreservation of umbilical cord blood for unrelated transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000, 26:1263-1270.
31. Ballen K.K., Wilson M., Wuu J., Ceredona A.M., Hsieh C., Stewart F.M., et al. Bigger is better: maternal and neonatal predictors of hematopoietic potential of umbilical cord blood units. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001, 2:7-14.
32. Armitage S. Cord blood processing: volume reduction. Cell Preserv Technol 2004, 4:9-16.
33. Nakagawa R., Wanatabe T., Kawano Y., Kanai S., Suzuya H., Kaneko M., et al. Analysis of maternal and neonatal factors that influence the nucleated and CD34+ cell yield for cord blood banking. Transfusion 2004, 44:26-67.
34. Guttridge M.G., Soh T.G., Belfield H., Sidders C., Watt S.M. Storage time affects umbilical cord blood viability. Transfusion 2014, 54:1278-1285.
35. Brand A., Eichler H., Sczepiorkowski Z.M., Hess J.R., Kekomaki R., McKenna D.H., et al. Viability does not necessarily reflect the hematopoietic progenitor cell potency of a cord blood unit: results of an interlaboratory exercise. Transfusion 2008, 48:546-549.
36. Louis I., Wagner E., Dieng M.M., Morin H., Champagne M.A., Haddad E. Impact of storage temperature and processing delays on cord blood quality: discrepancy between functional in vitro and in vivo assays. Transfusion 2012, 52:2401-2405.