Formative evaluation of the chinese high gifted education program

Roeper Review

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 50-53

  Lim, Tock Keng ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928285480     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199609553787     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Betts, G. (1985) Journey into Self and Experience in Personal Growth, Greely, CO: Autonomous Learning Publications Specialists.
2. Cai, C. E., Neo, T. C., Zhou, Y. S., Tan, E. & Leow, A. C. T. (1994) The effect of root aeration on hydroponic tomato production, Singapore: The Chinese High School.
3. Callahan, C. M. (1993) Evaluation programs and procedures for gifted education: International problems and solutions, In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks & A. H. Passow (Eds.) International Handbook of Research and Development, 605-618.
4. Coopersmith, S. (1981) Self Esteem Inventories, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
5. Cross, J. A. and Dobbs, J. A. (1987) Training teachers of gifted children, Roeper Review, 9(3) 170-171.
6. Feldhusen, J. F. (1989) Synthesis of research on gifted youth, Educational Leadership, 54(6) 6-12.
7. Feldhusen, J. F. (1991) Full-time classes for gifted youths, GCT, 5, 10-13.
8. Fiedler, E. D., Lange, R. E., and Winebrenner, S. (1993) In search of reality: Unravelling the myths about tracking, ability grouping and the gifted, Roeper Review, 16(1)4-7.
9. Fraser, B. J. (1981) Test of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA), Hawthorne, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
10. Kulik, J. A. and Kulik, C.-L. C. (1984) Synthesis of research on effects of accelerated instruction. Educational Leadership, 42(2) 84-89.
11. Lim, T. K. (1994a) Letters to themselves: Gifted students' plans for positive lifestyles, Roeper Review, 17(2) 85 -89.
12. Lim, T. K. (1994b) Understanding underachievers in a pull-out gifted program in Singapore, Paper presented at the Tenth Biennial Conference-Workshop of the Association of Psychological and Educational Counsellors of Asia, Singapore, September.
13. Lim, T. K. and Tan, L. S. (in press) A pull out gifted program in Singapore, Gifted Education International.
14. Marsh, H. W. (1988) Self-Description Questionnaire-1 Manual and Research Monograph, San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
15. Moos, R. H. & Trickett, E. J. (1974) Classroom Environment Scale Manual, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
16. Oakes, J. (1986) Keeping track: The policy and practice of curriculum inequality, Part I, Phi Delta Kappan, 68(1)12-17.
17. Ong, K. W., Ng, Y. P. & Ilango, R. (1994) A feasibility study on the robot sweeper, Singapore: The Chinese High School.
18. Siegal E. (1967) How to encourage creativity in teachers, Roeper Review, 9(1) 18-19.
19. Tan, J. (1993) Independent schools in Singapore: Implications for social and educational inequalities, International Journal of Educational Development, 13(3) 239-251.
20. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1991) Gifted education in the balance: Building relationships with general education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(1) 20-25.
21. Witham, J. (1991) A full-time solution to part-time problems, GCT, 62(6) 10-12.
22. Zorman, R. (1993) Mentoring and role modelling programs for the gifted, In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks & A. H. Passow (Eds.) International Handbook of Research and Development, 727-741.