Plato’s forms in transition: A reading of the Parmenides

Plato's Forms in Transition: A Reading of the Parmenides

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-272

  Rickless, Samuel C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928283794     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511482618     Document Type: Book

References (127)

1. Allen, Reginald E. 1960. “Participation and Predication in Plato’s Middle Dialogues.” Philosophical Review69: 147–164.
2. Allen, Reginald E. 1965. Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
3. Allen, Reginald E. 1983. Plato’s Parmenides: Translation and Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4. Allen, Reginald E. 1997. Plato’s Parmenides. Revised edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
5. Annas, Julia. 1974. “Forms and First Principles.” Phronesis19: 257–283.
6. Annas, Julia. 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Baltzly, Dirk. 1997. “Knowledge and Belief in Republic V.” Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie79: 239–272.
8. Benson, Hugh H. 2000. Socratic Wisdom: The Model of Knowledge in Plato’s Early Dialogues. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Beversluis, John. 1993. “Vlastos’s Quest for the Historical Socrates.” Ancient Philosophy13: 293–312.
10. Bluck, R. S. 1955. Plato’s Phaedo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
11. Bostock, David. 1986. Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12. Brown, Lesley. 1986. “Being in the Sophist: A Syntactical Inquiry.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy4: 49–70.
13. Brumbaugh, Robert S. 1961. Plato on the One: The Hypotheses in the Parmenides. New Haven: Yale University Press.
14. Burge, Evan L. 1971. “The Ideas as Aitiai in the Phaedo.” Phronesis16: 1–13.
15. Burnet, John. 1911. Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Cherniss, Harold. 1945. The Riddle of the Early Academy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Cherniss, Harold. 1957. “The Relation of the Timaeus to Plato’s LaterDialogues.” American Journal of Philology78: 225–266.
18. Cohen, S. Marc. 1971. “The Logic of the Third Man.” Philosophical Review80: 448–475.
19. Cooper, John M. (ed.). 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett.
20. Cornford, Francis M. 1939. Plato and Parmenides. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
21. Cresswell, M. J. 1971. “Plato’s Theory of Causality: Phaedo 95–106.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy49: 244–249.
22. Crombie, I. M. 1962–1963. An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines. 2 vols. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
23. Cross, R. C. and A. D. Woozley. 1964. Plato’s Republic: A Philosophical Commentary. London: Macmillan.
24. Dancy, R. M. 1984. “The One, The Many, and the Forms: Philebus 15b1–8.” Ancient Philosophy4: 160–193.
25. Dancy, R. M. 1991. Two Studies in the Early Academy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26. Dancy, R. M. 2004. Plato’s Introduction of Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Devereux, Daniel. 1994. “Separation and Immanence in Plato’s Theory of Forms.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy12: 63–90.
28. Dorter, Kenneth. 1994. Form and Good in Plato’s Eleatic Dialogues: The Parmenides, Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. Fine, Gail. 1978. “Knowledge and Belief in Republic V.” Archiv f¨ur Geschichte der Philosophie 60: 121–139. Reprinted in Fine 2003, 66–84.
30. Fine, Gail. 1980. “The One over Many.” Philosophical Review89: 197–240.
31. Fine, Gail. 1984. “Separation.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 31–87. Reprinted in Fine 2003, 252–300.
32. Fine, Gail. 1985. “Separation: A Reply to Morrison.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy3: 159–165.
33. Fine, Gail. 1990. “Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII.” In Epistemology: Companions to Ancient Thought, vol. i, edited by Stephen Everson, 85–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Fine 2003, 85–116.
34. Fine, Gail. 1993. On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35. Fine, Gail. 2003. Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
36. Forrester, James W. 1972. “Plato’s Parmenides: The Structure of the First Hypothesis.” Journal of the History of Philosophy10: 1–14.
37. Frances, Bryan. 1996. “Plato’s Response to the Third Man Argument in the Paradoxical Exercise of the Parmenides.” Ancient Philosophy16: 47–64.
38. Gallop, David. 1975. Plato: Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
39. Gerson, Lloyd P. 2000. “Plato Absconditus.” In Who Speaks for Plato: Studies in Platonic Anonymity, edited by Gerald A. Press, 201–210. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
40. Gill, Mary Louise. 1996. “Introduction.” In Gill and Ryan 1996, 1–116.
41. Gill, Mary Louise and Paul Ryan (eds.). 1996. Plato: Parmenides. Indianapolis: Hackett. Reprinted, without the introduction, in Cooper 1997, 360–397.
42. Gonzalez, Francisco. 1996. “Propositions or Objects? A Critique of Gail Fine on Knowledge and Belief in Republic V.” Phronesis41: 245–275.
43. Gosling, Justin. 1960. “Republic V: ta polla kala.” Phronesis5: 116–128.
44. Gosling, Justin. 1965. “Similarity in Phaedo 73b seq.” Phronesis10: 151–161.
45. Gosling, Justin. 1977. “Reply to White.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy7: 307–314.
46. Hackforth, R. 1955. Plato’s Phaedo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Harte, Verity. 2002. Plato on Parts aHardie, W. F. R. 1936. A Study in Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
48. Harte, Verity. 2002. Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
49. Hestir, Blake. 2000. “A Conception of Truth in Republic V.” History of Philosophy Quarterly17: 311–332.
50. Irwin, Terence H. 1977a. Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
51. Irwin, Terence H. 1977b. “Plato’s Heracliteanism.” Philosophical Quarterly27: 1–13.
52. Irwin, Terence H. 1999. “The Theory of Forms.” In Plato I: Metaphysics and Epistemology, edited by Gail Fine, 143–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Kahn, Charles H. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Kirwan, Christopher. 1974. “Plato and Relativity.” Phronesis19: 112–129.
55. Kraut, Richard (ed.). 1992a. The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Kraut, Richard (ed.). 1992b. “Introduction to the Study of Plato.” In Kraut 1992a, 1–50.
57. Lloyd, A. C. 1976. “The Principle that the Cause is Greater than Its Effect.” Phronesis21: 146–156.
58. Malcolm, John. 1991. Plato on the Self-Predication of Forms: Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
59. Matthen, Mohan. 1984. “Forms and Participants in Plato’s Phaedo.” Nous 18: 281– 297.
60. McCabe, Mary M. 1994. Plato’s Individuals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
61. Meinwald, Constance C. 1991. Plato’s Parmenides. New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Meinwald, Constance C. 1992. “Good-bye to the Third Man.” In Kraut 1992a, 365–396.
63. Miller, Mitchell H., Jr. 1986. Plato’s Parmenides: The Conversion of the Soul. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
64. Mills, K. W. 1957–1958. “Plato’s Phaedo, 74b7–c6.” Phronesis 2: 128–147 and 3: 40–58.
65. Moravcsik, Julius. 1992. Plato and Platonism. Oxford: Blackwell.
66. Morrison, D. R. 1985a. “Separation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy3: 31–89.
67. Morrison, D. R. 1985b. “Separation: A Reply to Fine.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy3: 167–173.
68. Nails, Debra. 1993. “Problems with Vlastos’s Platonic Developmentalism.” Ancient Philosophy13: 273–291.
69. Nails, Debra. 2000. “Mouthpiece Schmouthpiece.” In Who Speaks for Plato: Studies in Platonic Anonymity, edited by Gerald A. Press, 15–26. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
70. Nehamas, Alexander. 1975a. “Plato on the Imperfection of the Sensible World.” American Philosophical Quarterly 12: 105–117. Reprinted in Nehamas 1999, 138–158.
71. Nehamas, Alexander. 1975b. “ConfusingUniversals and Particulars in Plato’s EarlyDialogues.” Review of Metaphysics 29: 287–306. Reprinted in Nehamas 1999, 159–175.
72. Nehamas, Alexander. 1979. “Self-Predication and Plato’s Theory of Forms.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 93–103. Reprinted in Nehamas 1999, 176–195.
73. Nehamas, Alexander. 1982. “Participation and Predication in Plato’s Later Thought.” Review of Metaphysics 36: 343–374. Reprinted in Nehamas 1999, 196–223.
74. Nehamas, Alexander. 1999. Virtues of Authenticity: Essays on Plato and Socrates. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
75. Owen, G. E. L. 1953. “The Place of the Timaeus in Plato’s Dialogues.” Classical Quarterly, N. S. 111: 79–95. Reprinted in Owen 1986, 65–84.
76. Owen, G. E. L. 1953. 1957. “A Proof in the Peri Ideon.” Journal ofHellenic Studies77: 103–111. Reprinted in Owen 1986, 165–179.
77. Owen, G. E. L. 1968. “Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of the Forms.” In Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics (Papers of The Third Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford: Oxford University Press), edited by G. E. L. Owen, 103–125. Reprinted in Owen 1986, 221–238.
78. Owen, G. E. L. 1970. “Notes on Ryle’s Plato.” In Ryle: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Oscar P. Wood and George Pitcher, 341–372. Reprinted in Owen 1986, 85–103.
79. Owen, G. E. L. 1986. Logic, Science, and Dialectic: Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
80. Patterson, Richard. 1985. Image and Reality in Plato’s Metaphysics. Indianapolis: Hackett.
81. Patterson, Richard. 1999. “Forms, Fallacies, and the Functions of Plato’s Parmenides.” Apeiron32: 89–106.
82. Penner, Terry. 1987. The Ascent From Nominalism: Some Existence Arguments in Plato’s Middle Dialogues. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
83. Peterson, Sandra. 1973. “A Reasonable Self-Predication Premise for the Third Man Argument.” Philosophical Review82: 451–470.
84. Peterson, Sandra. 1981. “The Greatest Difficulty for Plato’s Theory of Forms: The Unknowability Argument of Parmenides 133c–134c.” Archiv f¨ur Geschichte der Philosophie63: 1–16.
85. Peterson, Sandra. 1996. “Plato’s Parmenides: A Principle of Interpretation and Seven Arguments.” Journal of the History of Philosophy34: 167–192.
86. Peterson, Sandra. 2000. “The LanguageGame in Plato’s Parmenides.” Ancient Philosophy20: 19–51.
87. Peterson, Sandra. 2003. “New Rounds of the Exercise in Plato’s Parmenides.” Modern Schoolman80: 245–278.
88. Press, Gerald A. 2000. “The Logic of Attributing Characters’ Views to Plato.” In Who Speaks for Plato: Studies in Platonic Anonymity, edited by Gerald A. Press, 27–38. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
89. Prior, William J. 1985.Unity and Development in Plato’s Metaphysics. La Salle: Open Court.
90. Prior, William J. 2004. Review of Silverman 2002. Journal of the History of Philosophy42: 97–98.
91. Rickless, Samuel C. 1998a. “How Parmenides Saved the Theory of Forms.” Philosophical Review107: 501–554.
92. Rickless, Samuel C. 1998b. “Socrates’Moral Intellectualism.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79: 355– 367.
93. Robinson, Richard. 1953. Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
94. Rohr, Michael David. 1980. “Empty Forms in Plato.” In Reforging the Great Chain of Being, edited by Simo Knuuttila, 19–56. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
95. Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
96. Ross, W. D. 1951. Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
97. Runciman, W. G. 1959. “Plato’s Parmenides.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 64: 89–120. Reprinted in Allen 1965, 149–184.
98. Ryle, Gilbert. 1939. “Plato’s Parmenides.” Mind 48: 129–151 and 302–325. Reprinted in Allen 1965, 97–147.
99. Ryle, Gilbert. 1966. Plato’s Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Sayre, Kenneth. 1983. Plato’s Late Ontology: A Riddle Resolved. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
101. Sayre, Kenneth. 1996. Parmenides’ Lesson: Translation and Explication of Plato’s Parmenides. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.
102. Schofield, Malcolm. 1996. “Likeness and Likenesses in the Parmenides.” In Form and Argument in Late Plato, edited by Christopher Gill and Mary M. McCabe, 49–77. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
103. Scolnicov, Samuel. 2003. Plato’s Parmenides. Berkeley: University of California Press.
104. Sedley, David. 1998. “Platonic Causes.” Phronesis43: 114–132.
105. Shorey, Paul. 1903. The Unity of Plato’s Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
106. Shorey, Paul. 1933. What Plato Said. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
107. Silverman, Allan. 2002. The Dialectic of Essence: A Study of Plato’s Metaphysics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
108. Smith, J. A. 1917. “General Relative Clauses in Greek.” Classical Review31: 69–71.
109. Sonnenschein, E. A. 1918. “The Indicative in Relative Clauses.” Classical Review32: 68–69.
110. Taylor, A. E. 1915–1916. “Parmenides, Zeno, and Socrates.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society16: 234–289.
111. Teloh, Henry. 1981. The Development of Plato’sMetaphysics. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
112. Turnbull, Robert. 1998. The Parmenides and Plato’s Late Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
113. Vlastos, Gregory. 1954. “The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides.” Philosophical Review 63: 319–349. Reprinted, with an addendum, in Vlastos 1995, 166–193.
114. Vlastos, Gregory. 1965a. “A Metaphysical Paradox.” In Vlastos 1981, 43–57.
115. Vlastos, Gregory. 1965b. “Degrees of Reality in Plato.” In New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, edited by Renford Bambrough, 1–19. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Reprinted in Vlastos 1981, 58–75.
116. Vlastos, Gregory. 1969. “Plato’s ‘Third Man’ Argument (Parm. 132a1–b2): Text and Logic.” Philosophical Quarterly 19: 289–301. Reprinted in Vlastos 1981, 342–365.
117. Vlastos, Gregory. 1974. “A Note on ‘Pauline Predications’ in Plato.” Phronesis19: 95–101. Reprinted in Vlastos 1981, 404–409.
118. Vlastos, Gregory. 1981. Platonic Studies. 2nd edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
119. Vlastos, Gregory. 1987. “Separation’ in Plato.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy5: 187–196.
120. Vlastos, Gregory. 1991. Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
121. Vlastos, Gregory. 1995. Studies in Greek Philosophy, vol. ii: Socrates, Plato, and Their Tradition. Edited by Daniel Graham. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
122. Wedberg, Anders. 1955. Plato’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell. Chapter 3 reprinted in Plato: A Collection of Critical Essays, vol. i:Metaphysics and Epistemology, edited byGregory Vlastos, 28–52. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor.
123. White, F. C. 1977. “The ‘Many’ in Republic 475a–480a.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7: 291–306.
124. White, F. C. 1978. “J. Gosling on ta polla kala.” Phronesis23: 127–132.
125. White, Nicholas P. 1987. “Forms and Sensibles: Phaedo 74B–C.” Philosophical Topics15: 197–214.
126. White, Nicholas P. 1992. “Plato’s Metaphysical Epistemology.” In Kraut 1992a, 277–310.
127. Wundt, Max. 1935. Platons Parmenides. Stuttgart and Berlin: W. Kohlhammer.