Novel naturally crosslinked electrospun nanofibrous chitosan mats for guided bone regeneration membranes: Material characterization and cytocompatibility

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 577-583

  Norowski, Peter A ^a   Fujiwara, Tomoko ^b   Clem, William C ^c   Adatrow, Pradeep C ^d   Eckstein, Eugene C ^a   Haggard, Warren O ^a   Bumgardner, Joel D ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

^c WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Chitosan; Degradation; Electrospinning; Genipin; Guided bone regeneration; Mechanical properties; Membrane

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABILITY; BIODEGRADATION; BONE; CHITOSAN; CROSSLINKING; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEMBRANES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE REGENERATION;

BARRIER MEMBRANE; CROSSLINKED; CYTOCOMPATIBILITY; ELECTROSPUNS; FIBER DIAMETERS; GENIPIN; GUIDED BONE REGENERATION; NANO-FIBROUS; REGENERATION MEMBRANE; TIME FRAME;

DEGRADATION;

CHITOSAN; GENIPIN; NANOFIBER; BIOMATERIAL; CROSS LINKING REAGENT; GLUTARALDEHYDE; IRIDOID;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADATION; BONE REGENERATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; ELECTROSPINNING; GUIDED BONE REGENERATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; OSSIFICATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PERMEABILITY BARRIER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGENERATIVE ABILITY; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SAOS 2 CELL LINE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ENGINEERING; BONE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOLOGY; PRESSURE; PROCEDURES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TUMOR CELL LINE;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE AND BONES; BONE REGENERATION; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHITOSAN; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; GLUTARAL; HUMANS; IRIDOIDS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PRESSURE; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84928268223     PISSN: 19326254     EISSN: 19327005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/term.1648     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker BE, et al. 1994; The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: a prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9(1): 31-40.
2. Bornstein MM, Bosshardt D, Buser D. 2007; Effect of two different bioabsorbable collagen membranes on guided bone regeneration: a comparative histomorphometric study in the dog mandible. J Periodontol 78(10): 1943-1953.
3. Chang WH, Chang Y, Lai PH, et al. 2003; A genipin-crosslinked gelatin membrane as wound-dressing material: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 14(5): 481-495.
4. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. 2009; Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(supp 4): 113-123.
5. Clarizio LF. 1999; Successful implant restoration without the use of membrane barriers. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57(9): 1117-1121.
6. Kuo SM, Chang SJ, Chen TW, et al. 2006; Guided tissue regeneration using a chitosan membrane: an experimental study in rats. J Biomed Mater Res A 76(2): 408-415.
7. Mcllwee HA, Schiffman JD, Cathell MD, et al. 2008; Deposition of chitosan: thin films and fibers. In Current Research and Developments on Chitin and Chitosan in Biomaterials Science, Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M (eds). Research Signpost: Kerala, India; 82-122.
8. Mi FL, Tan YC, Liang HC, et al. 2001, In vitro evaluation of a chitosan membrane cross-linked with genipin. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 12(8): 835-850.
9. Mi FL, Tan YC, Liang HF, et al. 2002; In vivo biocompatibility and degradability of a novel injectable-chitosan-based implant. Biomaterials 23(1): 181-191.
10. Moses O, Vitrial D, Aboodi G, et al. 2008; Biodegradation of three different collagen membranes in the rat calvarium: a comparative study. J Periodontol 79(5): 905-911.
11. Ohkawa K, Cha D, Kim H, et al. 2004; Electrospinning of chitosan. Macromol Rapid Commun 25: 1600-1605.
12. Sangsanoh P, Supaphol P. 2006; Stability improvement of electrospun chitosan nanofibrous membranes in neutral or weak basic aqueous solutions. Biomacromolecules 7(10): 2710-2704.
13. Sangsanoh P, Waleetorncheepsawat S, Suwantong O, et al. 2007; In vitro biocompatibility of Schwann cells on surfaces of biocompatible polymeric electrospun fibrous and solution-cast film scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 8(5): 1587-1594.
14. Schiffman JD, Schauer CL. 2007a; Cross-linking chitosan nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 8(2): 594-601.
15. Schiffman JD, Schauer CL. 2007b; One-step electrospinning of cross-linked chitosan fibers. Biomacromolecules 8(9): 2665-2667.
16. Shin SY, Park HN, Kim KH, et al. 2005; Biological evaluation of chitosan nanofiber membrane for guided bone regeneration. J Periodontol 76(10): 1778-1784.
17. Strietzel FP. 2001; [Risks and complications of membrane-guided bone regeneration. Retrospective analysis.] Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 5(1): 28-32.
18. Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, et al. 2008; Long-term biodegradation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked collagen barriers in human guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 19(3): 295-302.
19. Yeo YJ, Jeon DW, Kim CS, et al. 2005; Effects of chitosan non-woven membrane on periodontal healing of surgically created one-wall intrabony defects in beagle dogs. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 72(1): 86-93.