Anthropology and the “imaginators” of future European universities

Focaal

Volumn 2015, Issue 71, 2015, Pages 6-17

  Wright, Susan ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Academic reform; Anthropological methods; Privatization; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928250482     PISSN: 09201297     EISSN: 15585263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3167/fcl.2015.710102     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). 2011. Students at the heart of the system. Higher Education White Paper. London: HMSO.
2. Boden, Rebecca, and Susan Wright. 2010. Follow the money: An interim report on Danish university funding prepared for Dansk Magisterforening. Working Papers in University Reform 16. Copenhagen: Danish School of Education. http://edu.au.dk/fileadmin/www.dpu.dk/forskning/forskningsprogrammer/epoke/workingpapers/WP_16.pdf (accessed 12 December 2014).
3. Browne, John, Lord Browne of Madingley. 2010. Securing a sustainable future for higher education: An independent review of higher education funding and student finance. 12 October. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-browne-report-higher-education-fundingand-student-finance (accessed 14 December 2014).
4. Catcheside, Kim. 2012. What do universities actually gain by improving league table performance? The Guardian, 16 March.
5. Eversheds. 2009. Developing future university structures: New funding and legal models. London: Universities UK. http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/highereducation/Documents/2009/FutureUniversityStructures.pdf (accessed 14 December 2014).
6. Goodall, Amanda. 2006. Should top universities be led by top researchers, and are they? A citations analysis. Journal of Documentation 62: 388–411.
7. Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46(1): 1–35.
8. Jarratt, Alex, Sir. 1985. Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities. London: Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals.
9. Jones, Jonathan. 2013. Dominic Raab reveals Britain’s true debt burden. The Spectator, 4 May. http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2013/05/dominic-raab-reveals-britains-truedebt-burden/(accessed 14 December 2014).
10. Klein, Naomi. 2007. The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Picador.
11. McGettigan, Andrew. 2012. False accounting? Why the government’s higher education reforms don’t add up. London: Intergenerational Foundation. http://www.if.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/False-Accounting_-Why-Higher-Education-Reforms-dont-add-up.pdf (accessed 14 December 2014).
12. McGettigan, Andrew. 2013. The great university gamble: Money, markets and the future of higher education. London: Pluto Press.
13. Moore, Sally Falk. 1987. Explaining the present: Theoretical dilemmas in processual ethnography. American Ethnologist 14(4): 727–736.
14. Morgan, John. 2010. Massive cut in Britain. Inside Higher Education, 21 October. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/10/21/britain (accessed 14 December 2014).
15. Olds, Kris. 2010. Associations, networks, alliances, etc: Making sense of the emerging global higher education landscape. Discussion paper presented at the IAU conference, Mexico City, Mexico, 21 April. https://globalhighered.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/associations-networksalliances/(accessed 14 December 2014).
16. PA Consulting. 2009. Escaping the red queen effect: Succeeding in the new economies of higher education. London: PA Consulting Group. http://www.cisco.com/web/offer/emea/11046/docs/Escaping_the_Red_Queen_effect.pdf (accessed 14 December 2014).
17. PA Consulting. 2010. Universities through the looking glass: Reinventing the business of higher education. London: PA Consulting Group. http://hedbib.iau-aiu.net/pdf/PAConsultiing_Univ hrough_lookingglass.pdf (accessed 14 December 2014).
18. PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2010. In the eye of the storm: Moving from collaboration to consolidation. London: PwC Public Sector Research Centre.
19. RAE. 2001. 2001 Research Assessment Exercise: The outcome. Higher Education Funding Councils, RAE 4/01, December. http://www.rae.ac.uk/2001/Pubs/4_01/section1.asp (accessed 14 December 2014).
20. Rata, Elizabeth. 2010. What is driving university reform in the age of globalization? Debate with Dominic Boyer. In Susan Wright and Annika Rabo, eds., “Anthropologies of University Reform,” special issue, Social Anthropology 18(1): 74–82.
21. Rhoades, Gary, and Sheila Slaughter. 1997. Academic capitalism, managed professionals, and supply-side higher education. In “Academic Labor,” special issue, Social Text 51: 9–38.
22. Robertson, Susan, Roger Dale, Stavros Moutsios, Gritt Nielsen, Cris Shore, and Susan Wright. 2012. Globalization and regionalization in higher education: Toward a new conceptual framework— summative paper on URGE Work Package 1. Working Papers in University Reform 20. Copenhagen: Danish School of Education, Aarhus University. http://edu.au.dk/fileadmin/www.dpu.dk/forskningsprogrammer/epoke/WP_20_-_final.pdf (accessed 14 December 2014).
23. Sauder, Michael, and Wendy Nelson Espeland. 2009. The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organisational change. American Sociological Review 74(1): 63–82.
24. Vasagar, Jeevan, Patrick Wintour, and Hélène Mulholland. 2011. David Willetts on back foot over extra university places for higher fees. The Guardian, 10 May.
25. Wright, Susan. 2004. Markets, corporations, consumers? New landscapes in higher education. LATISS Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences 1(2): 71–93.
26. Wright, Susan. 2008. Governance as a regime of discipline. In Noel Dyck, ed., Exploring regimes of discipline: The dynamics of restraint, pp. 75–98. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
27. Wright, Susan. 2011. Section I. Studying policy: Methods, paradigms, perspectives—introduction. In Cris Shore, Susan Wright, and Davide Però, eds., Policy worlds: Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power, pp. 27–31. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
28. Wright, Susan. 2012. Ranking universities within a globalised world of competition states: To what purpose, and with what implications for students? In Hanne Leth Andersen and Jens Christian Jacobsen, eds., Uddannelseskvalitet i det 21. århundrede [Quality in higher education in the 21st century], pp. 79–100. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.