Blending trust and control: A challenge for school superintendents

The Educational Superintendent: Between Trust and Regulation An International Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-15

  Nir, Adam E ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928242829     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Adler, N. J. (1997). International dimensions of organizational behaviour. Cincinnati: South Western College Pub.
2. Bachmann, R. (2001). Trust power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organization Studies, 22 (2), 337-365.
3. Barnes, L. B. (1981). Managing the paradox of organizational trust. Harvard Business Review, 59 (March-April), 107-116.
4. Bijlsma-Frankema, K., & Costa, A. C. (2005). Understanding the trust-control nexus. International Sociology, 20 (3), 259-282.
5. Blumberg, A. (1985). The school superintendent: Living with conflict.New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Boyd, W. L. (1982). The politics of declining enrollments and school closings. In: N. H. Cambron-McCabe & A. Odden (Eds.), The changing politics of school Finance (pp. 231- 267). Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
7. Braynov, S., & Sandholm, T. (2002). Contracting with uncertain level of trust. Computational Intelligence, 18 (4), 501-514.
8. Byrd, J., Drews, C., & Johnson, J. (2006, October). Factors impacting superintendent turnover: Lessons from the field. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council of Educational Administration, Texas.
9. Carter, G. R., & Cunningham, W. G. (1997). The American school superintendent: Leading in an age of pressure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
10. Castaldo, S. (2007). Trust in market relationships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
11. Chapman, C. H. (Ed.). (1997). Becoming a superintendent: Challenges of school district leadership.Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
12. Costa, A. C., & Bijlsma-Frankema, K. (2007). Trust and control interrelations: New perspectives on the trust-control nexus. Group & Organization Management, 32 (4), 392- 406.
13. Crowson, R. L. (1987). The local school district superintendency: A puzzling administrative role. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23 (3), 49-69.
14. Cuban, L. (1985). Conflict and leadership in the superintendency. Phi. Delta Kappan, 67 (1), 28-30.
15. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2001). Trust control and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22 (2), 251-284.
16. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 491-512.
17. de Man, A. P., & Roijakkers, N. (2009). Alliance governance: Balancing control and trust in dealing with risk. Long Range Planning, 42 (1), 75-95.
18. Dekker, H. C. (2004). Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence of appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Accounting, Organization and Society, 29 (1), 27-49.
19. Den Hartog, D. N. (2004). Assertiveness. In: R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. Dorfman & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 395-431). Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
20. Douglas Creed, W. E., & Miles, R. E. (1996). Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies and the opportunity costs and controls. In: R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 16-38). Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
21. Drucker, P. F. (1980). Managing in turbulent times. New York: Harper and Row.
22. Edwards, M. (2007). The modern school superintendent: An overview of the role and responsibilities in the 21st century. Lincoln, Neb.: iUniverse, Inc.
23. Elboim-Dror, R. (1970). Some characteristics of the education policy formation system, Policy Science, 1 (1), 231-253.
24. Ferrin, D. L., Bligh, M. C., & Kohles, J. C. (2007). Can I trust you to trust me? A theory of trust, monitoring and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Group Organization Management, 32 (4), 465-499.
25. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
26. Gambetta, D. (Ed.), (1988). Trust: Making and breaking co-operative relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
27. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
28. Glass, T., & Bjork, L. (2003). The superintendent shortage: Findings from research on school board presidents. Journal of School Leadership, 13(3), 264-287.
29. Glass, T., Bjork, L., & Brunner, C. (2000). The study of the American superintendency, 2000: A look at the superintendent in the new millennium. Arlington, Va.: American Association of School Administrators.
30. Harris, P. R., & Moran, R. T. (1996). Managing cultural differences. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
31. Hogwood, B. W., & Peters, G. B. (1985). The pathology of public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Houston, P. (2007). From custodian to conductor.School Administrator, 64 (3), 28-33.
33. Jackson, B. L. (1995). Balancing act: The political role of the urban school superintendent. The Joint Center of Political and Economic Studies, Washington, DC.
34. Jagd, S. (2010). Balancing trust and control in organizations: Towards a process perspective. Society and Business Review, 5 (3), 259-269.
35. Johnson, S. M. (1996). Leading to change: The challenge of the new superintendency. San Francisco, Cal.: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
36. Jones, T. M., & Bowie, N. E. (1998). Moral hazards on the road to the virtual corporation.Business Ethics Quarterly, 8 (2), 272-292.
37. Kanter, R. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
38. Kaufman, R. A. (1972). Educational system planning. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
39. Khodyakov, D. (2007). The complexity of trust-control relationships in creative organizations: Insights from a qualitative analysis of a conductorless orchestra. Social Forces, 86 (1), 1-22.
40. Kowalski, T. J. (2006). The school superintendent: Theory, practice, and cases (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
41. Kowalski, T. J. (2005). Evolution of the school superintendent as communicator. Communication Education, 54 (2), 17.
42. Kowalski, T. J. (1995). Keepers of the flame: Contemporary urban superintendents. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Corwin Press.
43. Kramer, R. M. (1996). Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation. In: R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 216-245). Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
44. Lane, J. E. (1995). The public sector: concepts, models and approaches. London: Sage.
45. Leithwood, K. (1995). Effective school district leadership: Transforming politics into Education.Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
46. Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, (4), 498-518.
47. Leithwood, K., & Stager, M. (1989). Expertise in principals' problem solving.Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, (2), 126-161.
48. Leithwood, K., & Steinbach, R. (1994). The relationship between variations in patterns of school leadership and group problem-solving processes. In: P. Hallinger, K. Leithwood & J. Murphy (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 102-129). New York: Teachers College Press.
49. Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In: R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 114- 139). Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
50. Long, C., & Sitkin, S. B. (2006). Trust in the balance: how managers integrate trust building and task control. In: R. Bachmann & A Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of trust research (pp. 87-107). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
51. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: John Wiley.
52. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.) (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Bergen Universitetsforlaget.
53. Möllering, G. (2005a). Rational, institutional and active trust: Just do it!? In: K. M. Bijlsma- Frankema & R. J. A. Klein Woolthuis (Eds.), Trust under pressure: Empirical investigations of the functioning of trust and trust building in uncertain circumstances (pp. 24-51). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
54. Möllering, G. (2005b). The trust/control duality: An integrative perspectives on positive expectations of others. International Sociology, 20 (3), 283-305.
55. Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: reason, routine, reflexivity. Elsevier: London.
56. Natkin, G., Cooper, B., Alborano, J., Padilla, A., & Ghosh, S. (2002, April). Predicting and modeling superintendent turnover. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, La. Nir, A. E. (Ed.) (2009). Centralization and school empowerment: From rhetoric to practice. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
57. Nir, A. E. (2003). The impact of school-based management on public schools in Israel. Curriculum and Teaching, 18 (1), 65-80.
58. Nir, A. E., & Eyal, O. (2003). School-based management and the role conflict of the school superintendent.Journal of Educational Administration, 41 (5), 547-564.
59. Parkhe, A. (1998). Understanding trust in international alliances. Journal of World Business, 33 (3), 2190-240.
60. Petersen, G., & Barnett, B. (2005). The superintendent as instructional leader. In: L. G. Bjork & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 107-136). Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
61. Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23 (8), 707-725.
62. Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63. Rittel, H. W., & Webber, N. M. (1973). Dilemmas in general theory of planning. Policy Science, 4 (2), 155-169.
64. Rose, R. (1984). Understanding big government: The program approach. London: Sage.
65. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 393-404.
66. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
67. Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present and future. Academy of Management Review, 32 (2), 344-354.
68. Shapiro, D., Sheppard, B. H., & Cheraskin, L. (1992). Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8 (4), 365-377.
69. Shockley-Zalabak, P., & Ellis, K. (2000). Measuring organizational trust: Cross cultural survey and index. International Association of Business Communicators IABC, San Francisco.
70. Short, P. M., & Scribner, J. R. (Eds.) (2002). Case studies of the superintendency. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press.
71. Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic "remedies" for trust/distrust.Organizational Science, 4 (3), 367-392.
72. Stewart, J., & Ranson, S., (1994). Management in the public domain. In: D. McKevitt & A. Lawton (Eds.), Public sector management (pp. 54-84). London: Sage.
73. Sully de Luque, M., & Javidan, M., (2004). Uncertainty avoidance. In: R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 603-644). Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
74. Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (2003). Knowledge trust and control: Managing tensions and contradictions in the regional network of service firms. International Studies of Management and Organization, 33 (2), 69-99.
75. Thody, A. (1997). Leadership of schools: Chief executives in education.Wiltshire, U.K.: Redwood Books.
76. Tyler, T. R., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Whither trust? In: R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
77. Wagner, R. K. (1994). Practical problem-solving. In: P. Hallinger, K. Leithwood & J. Murphy (Eds.): Cognitive perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 88-102). New York: Teachers College Press.
78. Webb, E. J. (1996). Trust and crisis: Trust in organizations-frontiers of theory and research. In: R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 288-301). Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
79. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (1), 1-19.
80. Weiler, H. N. (1990). Comparative perspectives on educational decentralization: An exercise in contradiction? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12 (4), 433-448.
81. Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
82. Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.