Influence of cochlear implant insertion depth on performance: A prospective randomized trial

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1773-1779

  Buchman, Craig A ^a   Dillon, Margaret T ^a   King, English R ^b   Adunka, Marcia C ^b   Adunka, Oliver F ^a   Pillsbury, Harold C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina Heath Care   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Electrode insertion depth; Insertion angle; Sensorineural hearing loss

Indexed keywords

AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; METHODS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84928238111     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000541     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Greenwood DD. Critical bandwidth and frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 1961;33:1344-56.
2. Greenwood DD. A cochlear frequency-position function for several speciesV29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:2592-605.
3. Hochmair I, Arnold W, Nopp P, Jolly C, Müller J, Roland P. Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apicalmorphology, electrodes and speech perception results. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:612-7.
4. Hamzavi J, Arnoldner C. Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126:1182-7.
5. Gani M, Valentini G, Sigrist A, Kós MI, Boëx C. Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:69-83.
6. Chen JM, Farb R, Hanusaik L, Shipp D, Nedzelski JM. Depth and quality of electrode insertion: a radiologic and pitch scaling assessment of two cochlear implant systems. Am J Otol 1999;20:192-7.
7. Adunka OF, Dillon MT, Adunka MC, King ER, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA. Cochleostomy versus round window insertions: influence on functional outcomes in electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:613-8.
8. Xu J, Xu SA, Cohen LT, Clark GM. Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 2000;21:49-56.
9. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995;16:176-86.
10. Franke-Trieger A, Jolly C, Darbinjan A, Zahnert T, Mürbe D. Insertion depth angles of cochlear implant arrays with varying lengths: a temporal bone study. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:58-63.
11. Reiss LA, Turner CW, Erenberg SR, Gantz BJ. Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:241-57.
12. Reiss LA, Turner CW, Karsten SA, Gantz BJ. Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electroacoustic stimulation. Neuroscience 2014;256:43-52.
13. Adunka OF, Buss E, Clark MS, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2008;118:2044-9.
14. Gomaa NA, Rubinstein JT, Lowder MW, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ. Residual speech perception and cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults. Ear Hear 2003;24:539-44.