Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis

World Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 21, Issue 15, 2015, Pages 4757-4764

  Deng, Xu Feng ^a   Liu, Quan Xing ^a   Zhou, Dong ^a   Min, Jia Xin ^a   Dai, Ji Gang ^a  

^a THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Anastomotic leakage; Anastomotic stricture; Hand sewn anastomosis; Linearly stapled anastomosis; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS; ESOPHAGOGASTROSTOMY; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS SURGERY; GASTROINTESTINAL STAPLER; HAND MOVEMENT; HAND SEWN ANASTOMOSIS; HUMAN; LINEARLY STAPLED ANASTOMOSIS; META ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGUS; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; ODDS RATIO; PATHOLOGY; PROTECTION; RISK FACTOR; STOMACH; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE TECHNIQUE;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; ESOPHAGUS; HUMANS; ODDS RATIO; PROTECTIVE FACTORS; RISK FACTORS; STOMACH; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84928198095     PISSN: 10079327     EISSN: 22192840     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4757     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014; 64: 9-29 [PMID: 24399786 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21208]
2. Albiñana V, Recio-Poveda L, Zarrabeitia R, Bernabéu C, Botella LM. Propranolol as antiangiogenic candidate for the therapy of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Thromb Haemost 2012; 108: 41-53 [PMID: 22552254 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9]
3. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90 [PMID: 21296855 DOI: 10.3322/caac.20107]
4. Fok M, Ah-Chong AK, Cheng SW, Wong J. Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 342-345 [PMID: 2021852 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800780323]
5. Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 169-173 [PMID: 9296510 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199708000-00008]
6. Walther B, Johansson J, Johnsson F, Von Holstein CS, Zilling T. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 803-812; discussion 812-814 [PMID: 14631217 DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000098624.04100.b1]
7. Ercan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 623-631 [PMID: 15746747 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024]
8. Worrell S, Mumtaz S, Tsuboi K, Lee TH, Mittal SK. Anastomotic complications associated with stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis. J Surg Res 2010; 161: 9-12 [PMID: 19922950 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.07.004]
9. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Vyas S, Hashemi M, Winslet M. Hand-sewn versus stapled oesophago-gastric anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15: 876-884 [PMID: 21271360 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1426-9]
10. Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H, Nunobe S, Furukawa TA. Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 238-248 [PMID: 23001084 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826d4723]
11. Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, Otte JB, Kestens PJ. Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65: 814-817 [PMID: 9527220 DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)01384-2]
12. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 277-288 [PMID: 10649203 DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70183-8]
13. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12 [PMID: 8721797 DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4]
14. Singh D, Maley RH, Santucci T, Macherey RS, Bartley S, Weyant RJ, Landreneau RJ. Experience and technique of stapled mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 419-424 [PMID: 11235681 DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02337-7]
15. Casson AG, Porter GA, Veugelers PJ. Evolution and critical appraisal of anastomotic technique following resection of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Dis Esophagus 2002; 15: 296-302 [PMID: 12472475 DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2002.00277.x]
16. Behzadi A, Nichols FC, Cassivi SD, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Pairolero PC. Esophagogastrectomy: the influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 1031-1040; discussion 1040-1042 [PMID: 16269373 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.025]
17. Blackmon SH, Correa AM, Wynn B, Hofstetter WL, Martin LW, Mehran RJ, Rice DC, Swisher SG, Walsh GL, Roth JA, Vaporciyan AA. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: 1805-1813; discussion 1813 [PMID: 17462404]
18. Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, Evans K, Finley RJ, Yee J. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus 2008; 21: 422-429 [PMID: 19125796 DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00792.x]
19. Cooke DT, Lin GC, Lau CL, Zhang L, Si MS, Lee J, Chang AC, Pickens A, Orringer MB. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 177-184; discussion 184-185 [PMID: 19559221 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.035]
20. Deng B, Wang RW, Jiang YG, Tan QY, Zhao YP, Zhou JH, Liao XL, Ma Z. Functional and menometric study of side-to-side stapled anastomosis and traditional hand-sewn anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35: 8-12 [PMID: 18848461 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.008]
21. Xu QR, Wang KN, Wang WP, Zhang K, Chen LQ. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15: 915-921 [PMID: 21484495 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1490-1]
22. Saluja SS, Ray S, Pal S, Sanyal S, Agrawal N, Dash NR, Sahni P, Chattopadhyay TK. Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1287-1295 [PMID: 22528571 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1885-7]
23. Yang L, Zheng YF, Jiang JQ, Yu YK, Li W, Zheng XS. Comparison of esophagogastric side-to-side anastomosis and handsewn end-to-side anastomosis in neck. Chongqing Medicine 2012; 41: 3155-3156
24. Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN, Shi H, Chen LQ. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus handsewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg 2013; 37: 1043-1050 [PMID: 23381675 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-1932-x]
25. Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, Allen MS, Cassivi SD, Wigle DA, Shen KR, Deschamps C. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95: 1154-1160; discussion 1160-1161 [PMID: 23395626 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.045]
26. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 392-400; discussion 400-403 [PMID: 10493486 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00012]