Corrigendum to A neo-Kaleckian-Goodwin model of capitalist economic growth: monopoly power, managerial pay, and labor market conflict [Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38,6, (2014) DOI: 10.1093/cje/bet001];A neo-Kaleckian-Goodwin model of capitalist economic growth: Monopoly power, managerial pay and labour market conflict

Cambridge Journal of Economics

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1355-1372

  Palley, Thomas I ^a  

^a AFL CIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Bargaining power; Goodwin; Managerial pay; Neo kaleckian growth; Unemployment

Indexed keywords

BARGAINING; CAPITALISM; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ECONOMIC THEORY; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; LABOR MARKET; MONOPOLY; UNEMPLOYMENT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84928190161     PISSN: 0309166X     EISSN: 14643545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bev036     Document Type: Erratum

References (42)

1. Bhaduri, A. and Marglin S. A. 1990. Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 14, 375-93
2. Blanchflower, D. G. and Oswald, A. J. 1990. The wage curve, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 92, 215-35
3. Blanchflower, D. G. and Oswald, A. J. 1994. The Wage Curve, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
4. Brainard, W. and Tobin, J. 1977. Asset markets and the cost of capital, pp. 236-62 in Belassa, B. and Nelson, R. (eds), Economic Progress, Private Values, and Public Policy: Essays in Honor of William Fellner, New York, North Holland
5. Carrol, C. D. 1992. The buffer stock theory of saving: some macroeconomic evidence, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 2, 61-156
6. Committeri, P. 1986. Some comments on recent contributions on capital accumulation, income distribution and capacity utilization, Political Economy, vol. 2, 161-86
7. Dallery, T. and van Treeck, T. 2011. Conflicting claims and equilibrium adjustment processes in a stock-flow consistent macro model, Review of Political Economy, vol. 23, no. 2, 189-211
8. Dumenil, G. and Levy, D. 1999. Being Keynesian in the short term and classical in the long term: the traverse to classical long term equilibrium, Manchester School, vol. 67, 684-716
9. Dutt, A. K. 1984. Stagnation, income distribution and monopoly power, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 8, 25-40
10. Dutt, A. K. 2006. Aggregate demand, aggregate supply and economic growth, International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 20, 319-36
11. Goodwin, R. M. 1967. A growth cycle, pp. 54-58 in Feinstein, C. H. (ed.), Capitalism and Economic Growth, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
12. Hansen, A. H. 1932. The theory of technological progress and the dislocation of employment, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), vol. 22, 25-31
13. Hein, E., Lavoie, M. and van Treeck, T. 2011. Some instability puzzles in Kaleckian models of growth and distribution: a critical survey, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 35, no. 3, 587-612
14. Hein, E. and Tarassow, A. 2009. Distribution, aggregate demand and productivity growth: theory and empirical results for six OECD countries based on a post-Kaleckian model, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 28, 727-54
15. Jones, C. I. 1999. Growth: with or without scale effects? American Economic Review, vol. 89, no. 2, 139-44
16. Kaldor, N. 1957. A model of economic growth, Economic Journal, vol. 67, 591-624
17. Kalecki, M. 1970. The class struggle and the distribution of national income, Kyklos, vol. 24, no. 1, 1-8
18. Kurz, H. 1986. Normal positions and capacity utilization, Political Economy, vol. 2, 37-54
19. Lavoie, M. 1995. The Kaleckian model of growth and distribution and its neo-Ricardian and neo-Marxist critiques, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 19, 789-818
20. Lavoie, M. 2009. Cadrisme within a post Keynesian model of growth and distribution, Review of Political Economy, vol. 21, no. 3, 369-91
21. Leland, H. E. 1968. Saving and uncertainty: the precautionary demand for saving, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 82, no. 3, 465-73
22. Mohun, S. 2006. Distributive shares in the US economy, 1964-2001, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 30, no. 3, 347-70
23. Naastepad, C. W. M. 2006. Technology, demand and distribution: a cumulative growth model with an application to the Dutch productivity growth slowdown, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 30, 403-43
24. Naastepad, C. W. M. and Storm, S. 2006/07. OECD demand regimes (1996-2000), Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 29, 211-46
25. Neary, J. P. and Stiglitz, J. E. 1983. Towards a reconstruction of Keynesian economics: expectations and constrained equilibria, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 98 Suppl., 196-201
26. Palley, T. I. 1996. Growth theory in a Keynesian mode: some Keynesian foundations for new growth theory, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 19, 113-35
27. Palley, T. I. 1997. Aggregate demand and endogenous growth: a generalized Keynes-Kaldor model of economic growth, Metroeconomica, vol. 48, 161-76
28. Palley, T. I. 2005. class conflict and the Cambridge theory of distribution, pp. 203-24 in Gibson, B. (ed.), The Economics of Joan Robinson: A Centennial Celebration, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
29. Palley, T. I. 2011. Inside debt and the stability of inflation, Eastern Economic Journal, vol. 37, 488-507
30. Palley, T. I. 2012. Growth, unemployment and endogenous technical progress: a Hicksian resolution of Harrod's knife-edge, Metroeconomica, vol. 63, no. 3, 512-41
31. Rada, C. 2007. Stagnation or transformation of a dual economy through endogenous productivity growth, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 31, 711-40
32. Rotemberg, J. J. and Saloner, G. 1986. A super-game theoretic theory of price wars during booms, American Economic Review, vol. 76, 390-407
33. Rowthorn, R. 1982. Demand, real wages and growth, Studi Economici, vol. 19, 3-54
34. Saez, E. and Veall, M. R. 2005. The evolution of high incomes in North America: lessons from the Canadian experience, American Economic Review, vol. 95, no. 3, 831-49
35. Skott, P. 2010. Growth, instability and cycles: Harrodian and Kaleckian models of accumulation and income distribution, pp. 108-31 in Setterfield, M. (ed.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
36. Skott, P. 2012. Theoretical and empirical shortcomings of the Kaleckian investment function, Metroeconomica, vol. 63, no. 1, 109-38
37. Skott, P. and Zipperer, B. 2010. Dynamic patterns of accumulation and income distribution, Kikan Keizai-Riron (Political Economy Quarterly), vol. 46, no. 4, 34-53 (in Japanese)
38. Taylor, L. 1983. Structuralist Macroeconomics, New York, Basic Books
39. Taylor, L. 2004. Reconstructing Macroeconomics: Structuralist Proposals and Critiques of the Mainstream, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
40. Tobin, J. 1965. Money and economic growth, Econometrica, vol. 33, 671-84
41. Uzawa, H. 1961. Neutral inventions and the stability of growth equilibrium, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 28, no. 2, 117-24
42. Verdoorn, P. J. 1949. Fattori che regolano la sviluppo della produttivita del lavoro [Factors governing the growth of labor productivity], L'Industria, vol. 1, 3-10 (English translation by Thirlwall, A. P. and Thirlwall, G. 1979. Reprinted in Ironmonger, D., Perkins, J. O. N. and Tran, V. H. (eds), National Income and Economic Progress, Melbourne, Macmillan, 1988)