The origin and impact of ideals in ehealth research: Experiences from the U-CARE research environment

JMIR Research Protocols

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Sjöström, Jonas ^a,b   von Essen, Louise ^a   Grönqvist, Helena ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Accountability; Innovation; Relevance; Research management; Rigor; Stakeholders; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928159753     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19290748     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/resprot.3202     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barak A, Hen L, Boniel-Nissim M, Shapira N. A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of internet-mased psychotherapeutic interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services 2008 Jul 03; 26(2-4):109-160. [doi: 10.1080/15228830802094429]
2. Cuijpers P, Donker T, van Straten A, Li J, Andersson G. Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychol Med 2010 Dec; 40(12):1943-1957. [doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000772] [Medline: 20406528]
3. Tate D, Finkelstein EA, Khavjou O, Gustafson A. Cost effectiveness of internet interventions: Review and recommendations. Ann Behav Med 2009 Aug; 38(1):40-45 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9131-6] [Medline: 19834778]
4. Warmerdam L, Smit F, van Straten A, Riper H, Cuijpers P. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of internet-based treatment for adults with depressive symptoms: Randomized trial. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12(5):e53 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1436] [Medline: 21169166]
5. Campbell N, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, et al. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ 2007 Mar 3; 334(7591):455-459 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.BE] [Medline: 17332585]
6. Ahern D. Challenges and opportunities of eHealth research. Am J Prev Med 2007 May; 32(5 Suppl):S75-S82. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.016] [Medline: 17466822]
7. Whitehouse D, George C, Duquenoy P. Assessing legal, ethical and governance challenges in eHealth. In: EHealth: Legal, ethical and governance challenges. Berlin: Springer-Link; 2013:3-22.
8. Proudfoot J, Klein B, Barak A, Carlbring P, Cuijpers P, Lange A, et al. Establishing guidelines for executing and reporting internet intervention research. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 2011 Jun; 40(2):82-97. [doi: 10.1080/16506073.2011.573807]
9. Sjöström JO, Donnellan B, Helfert M. Product semantics in design research practice. In: Battacherjee A, Fitzgerald B, editors. Shaping the future of ICT research, methods, and approaches. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012:35-48.
10. Mitchell A, Ferguson DW, Gill J, Paul J, Symonds P. Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013 Jul; 14(8):721-732. [doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70244-4] [Medline: 23759376]
11. Roshanaei-Moghaddam B, Katon WJ, Russo J. The longitudinal effects of depression on physical activity. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2009; 31(4):306-315. [doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.04.002] [Medline: 19555789]
12. Grenard J, Munjas BA, Adams JL, Suttorp M, Maglione M, McGlynn EA, et al. Depression and medication adherence in the treatment of chronic diseases in the United States: A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2011 Oct; 26(10):1175-1182 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1704-y] [Medline: 21533823]
13. Bower P, Gilbody S. Stepped care in psychological therapies: Access, effectiveness and efficiency. Narrative literature review. Br J Psychiatry 2005 Jan; 186:11-17 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.1.11] [Medline: 15630118]
14. Riley S, Veale D. Behav. Cogn. Psychother. 1999. The internet and its relevance to cognitive behavioral psychotherapistsURL: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online & aid=48687[WebCite Cache ID 6Pc7OwbBa]
15. Dewey J. Logic - The theory of inquiry. New York: Saerchinger Press; 2007.
16. Susman GI, Evered RD. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1978. An assessment of the scientific merits of action researchURL: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2392581?uid=3739920 & uid=2129 & uid=2 & uid=70 & uid=4 & uid=3739256 & sid=21104172715243[WebCite Cache ID 6Pc8h2k6g]
17. Baskerville R, Kaul M, Storey V. ICIS 2011 Proceedings. 2011. Unpacking the duality of design scienceURL: http://aisel. aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/generaltopics/10/[accessed 2014-05-16] [WebCite Cache ID 6Pc8pwbGG]
18. Lee AS, Baskerville R. Information systems research. 2003. Generalizing generalizability in information systems researchURL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.95.7154 & rep=rep1 & type=pdf[WebCite Cache ID 6Pc8wJaI2]
19. Schatzki T, Knorr-Cetina K, Savigny EV. Introduction: Practice theory. In: The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge; 2001.
20. Giddens A. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1986.
21. Miles M, Huberman AM. B. In: Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
22. Weitzner D, Abelson H, Berners-Lee T, Feigenbaum J, Hendler J, Sussman GJ. Information accountability. Commun. ACM 2008 Jun 01; 51(6):82-87. [doi: 10.1145/1349026.1349043]
23. United Nations: The universal declaration of human rights. URL: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/[accessed 2013-11-21] [WebCite Cache ID 6LIK5GgYI]
24. Kluge E. Secure e-Health: Managing risks to patient health data. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76(5-6):402-406. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.003] [Medline: 17084665]
25. Baregheh A, Rowley J, Sambrook S. Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision 2009; 47(8):1323-1339. [doi: 10.1108/00251740910984578]
26. Balas EA, Boren SA. Yearbook of medical informatics 2000: Patient-centered systems. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft; 2000. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvementURL: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Publications/Managingclinicalknowledgeforhealthcareimprovement.aspx [accessed 2014-05-16] [WebCite Cache ID 6Pc9MqLrm]
27. Thorpe K, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, et al. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): A tool to help trial designers. CMAJ 2009 May 12; 180(10):E47-E57 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090523] [Medline: 19372436]
28. Glasgow R, Green LW, Taylor MV, Stange KC. An evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice. Am J Prev Med 2012 Jun; 42(6):646-654. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.016] [Medline: 22608384]
29. Fried B, Weinreich G, Cavalier GM, Lester KJ. e-Health: Technologic revolution meets regulatory constraint. Health Aff (Millwood) 2000; 19(6):124-131 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 11192395]
30. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S. MIS Quarterly. 2004. Design science in information systems researchURL: http://em.wtu.edu.cn/mis/jxkz/sjkx.pdf [accessed 2014-05-16] [WebCite Cache ID 6PcAQFXVh]
31. Simon H. The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1996.
32. Sein M, Henfridsson O, Purao S, Rossi M, Lindgren R. MIS Quarterly. 2011. Action design researchURL: http://misq.org/cat-articles/action-design-research.html [accessed 2014-05-16] [WebCite Cache ID 6PcAmDoIl]
33. Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Bala H. MIS Quarterly. 2013. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systemsURL: http://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol37/iss1/3/[accessed 2014-05-16] [WebCite Cache ID 6PcAxOlzz]
34. Eysenbach G, Wyatt J. Using the Internet for surveys and health research. J. Med. Internet Res 2002; 4. [doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.2.e13]
35. Webb T, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12(1):e4 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1376] [Medline: 20164043]
36. Sjöström JO, Rahman MH, Rafiq A, Lochan R, Ågerfalk PJ. Design science at the intersection of physical and virtual design. Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. Respondent behavior logging: An opportunity for online survey designURL: http://link. springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-38827-9_44 [accessed 2014-05-16] [WebCite Cache ID 6PcBGd5JO]
37. United Nations. Report of the World Commission on environment and development. General Assembly Resolution 42. United Nations: United Nations; 1987. URL: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/ares42-187.htm [accessed 2014-05-16] [WebCite Cache ID 6PcZxZkDD]
38. Bengtsson F, Ågerfalk PJ. Information technology as a change actant in sustainability innovation: Insights from Uppsala. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2011 Mar; 20(1):96-112. [doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2010.09.007]
39. Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res 2001; 3(2):E20 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20] [Medline: 11720962]