Planning in Europe for ‘EU’rope: Spatial planning as a political technology of territory

Planning Theory

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 174-194

  Luukkonen, Juho ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

European integration; spatial planning; territory

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY; SPATIAL PLANNING; TERRITORIAL PLANNING; TERRITORY;

EUROPE;

EID: 84928159675     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: 17413052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095213519355     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Allmendinger P,Haughton G.Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway.Environment and Planning A. 2009;41 (3): 617-633
2. Allmendinger P,Haughton G.Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus?.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2012;37 (1): 89-103
3. Antikainen J,Vartiainen PPositioning Finland in a European Space. Eskelinen HHirvonen T, ed. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment and Ministry of the Interior; 2006:30-40.
4. Antonsich M.On territory, the nation-state and the crisis of the hyphen.Progress in Human Geography. 2009;33 (6): 789-806
5. Barnes TJ,Minca C.Nazi spatial theory: The dark geographies of Carl Schmitt and Walter Christaller.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2012;103 (3): 669-687
6. Barry A.The European Community and European government: Harmonization, mobility and space.Economy and Society. 1993;22 (3): 314-326
7. Berezin MEurope without Borders: Remapping Territory, Citizenship and Identity in a Transnational Age. Berezin MSchain M, ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2003:1-30.
8. Territorial agenda of the European Union.Agreed on the occasion of the informal ministerial meeting on urban development and territorial cohesion; 2007Leipzig; 2007.
9. Böhme KNordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning: Discursive Integration in Practice. Stockholm: Nordregio; 2002:
10. Böhme K,Waterhout BEuropean Spatial Research and Planning. Faludi A, ed. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 2008:225-248.
11. Bourdieu PThe Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Johnson R, ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1993:29-73.
12. Buser M.The production of space in metropolitan regions: A Lefebvrian analysis of governance and spatial change.Planning Theory. 2012;11 (3): 279-298
13. .Council of Europe Publishing; 1983 1983Strasbourg; 1983 1983.
14. Spatial Development Glossary: Territory and Landscape. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing; 2007:
15. Clark J,Jones A.The spatialities of Europeanisation: Territory, government and power in ‘EUrope’.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2008;33 (3): 300-318
16. Europe 2000: Outlook for the Development of the Community’s Territory. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1991:
17. European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1999:
18. Green paper on territorial cohesion: Turning territorial diversity into strength. Brussels: ; 2008 2008 2008:
19. EUROPE 2020: A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: ; 2010 2010:
20. Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions.Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development; 2011Gödöllő, Hungary; 2011.
21. Davoudi S.Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda.European Planning Studies. 2003;11 (8): 979-999
22. Davoudi SConceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. Davoudi SStrange I, ed. London: Routledge; 2009:207-243.
23. Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. Davoudi SStrange I, ed. London: Routledge; 2009:
24. Deas I,Lord A.From a new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The emergence of non-standard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganization of the state.Urban Studies. 2006;43 (10): 1847-1877
25. De Jong M,Edelenbos J.An insider’s look into policy transfer in transnational expert networks.European Planning Studies. 2007;15 (5): 687-706
26. Delanty G,Rumford CRethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization. London: Routledge; 2005:
27. Dühr S,Colomb C,Nadin VEuropean Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. London: Routledge; 2010:
28. ECTP-CEU (2013) The charter of European planning. Approved by the General assembly of Barcelona 22April2013. Available at: http://www.ectp-ceu.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=283&catid=6 (accessed 5 January 2014).
29. Elden S.Land, terrain, territory.Progress in Human Geography. 2010;34 (6): 799-817
30. Eskelinen H,Lapintie K,Kokkonen M.Nordic Legacy and the European connection: The emergence of integrated spatial planning in Finland.Built Environment. 2000;26 (1): 41-51
31. European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON) (2011) ESPON Projects: Overview by November 2011 (ESPON 2013 Programme). Available at: http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ProjectOverview/ (accessed 5 January 2014).
32. EUROPA – Transparency Register (2013) Available at: http://europa.eu/transparency-register/index_en.htm (accessed 6 June 2013).
33. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1997:
34. Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society. Faludi A, ed. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 2007:
35. Faludi A.A roving band of planners.Built Environment. 1997;23 (4): 281-287
36. Faludi ACohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age?. London: Routledge; 2010:
37. Faludi A.Territorial cohesion and subsidiarity under the European Union treaties: A critique of the ‘Territorialism’ underlying.Regional Studies. 2013;47 (9): 1594-1606
38. Faludi A,Waterhout BThe Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan. London: Routledge; 2002:
39. Ferreira A,Sykes O,Batey P.Planning theory or planning theories? The hydra model and its implications for planning education.Journal for Education in the Built Environment. 2009;4 (2): 29-54
40. Florida RCities and the Creative Class. London: Routledge; 2005:
41. Florida RWho’s Your City? How the Creative Economy Is Making Where to Live the Most Important Decision of Your Life. New York: Basic Books; 2008:
42. Giannakourou G.Transforming spatial planning policy in Mediterranean countries: Europeanization and domestic change.European Planning Studies. 2005;13 (2): 319-331
43. Governa F,Salone C.Italy and European spatial policies: Polycentrism, urban networks and local innovation practices.European Planning Studies. 2005;13 (2): 265-283
44. Graham S,Healey P.Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice.European Planning Studies. 1999;7 (5): 623-646
45. Gualini E.Cross-border Governance: Inventing Regions in a Trans-national Multi-level Polity.disP: The Planning Review. 2003;39 (152): 43-52
46. Gualini EMulti-level Governance and Institutional Change: The Europeanization of Regional Policy in Italy. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2004:
47. Gunder M.Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space.Planning Theory. 2010;9 (4): 298-314
48. Haughton G,Allmendinger P,Counsell D, et alThe New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries. London: Routledge; 2010:
49. Healey P.The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2004;28 (1): 45-67
50. Healey P.Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning.European Planning Studies. 2006;14 (4): 525-546
51. Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe. Healey PKhakee AMotte A, ed. London: University College London Press; 1997:
52. Hillier JThe Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning. Hillier JHealey P, ed. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2010a:1-34.
53. Hillier JThe Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning. Hillier JHealey P, ed. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2010b:235-250.
54. The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning. Hillier JHealey P, ed. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2010:
55. Janin Rivolin U,Faludi A.The hidden face of European spatial planning: Innovations in governance.European Planning Studies. 2005;13 (2): 195-215
56. Jauhiainen JS,Harvio S,Luukkonen J, et alKehittämisvyöhykkeet aluekehittämisessä. Helsinki: Sisäasiainministeriö; 2007:
57. Jensen OB,Richardson TMaking European Space: Mobility, Power and Territorial Identity. London: Routledge; 2004:
58. Jonas AEG.Region and place: Regionalism in question.Progress in Human Geography. 2012;36 (2): 263-272
59. Kunzmann KRegional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged European Union. Adams NAlden JHarris N, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2006:43-63.
60. Kuus M.Whose regional expertise? Political geographies of knowledge in the European Union.European Urban and Regional Studies. 2011;18 (3): 275-288
61. Law-Yone H.Another planning theory? Rewriting the meta-narrative.Planning Theory. 2007;6 (3): 315-326
62. Lovering J.Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the ‘New Regionalism’ (Illustrated from the Case of Wales).International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1999;23 (2): 379-395
63. Luukkonen J.The Europeanization of regional development: Local strategies and European spatial visions in northern Finland.Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography. 2011;93 (3): 253-270
64. Luukkonen J.Making European space in spatial planning in Northern Finland.Growth and Change. 2012;43 (3): 392-418
65. The Governance of Place: Space and Planning Processes. Madanipour AHull AHealey P, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2001:
66. Suomen aluekehittämisstrategia 2020. Helsinki: Ministry of Employment and the Economy; 2010:
67. Alueiden käyttö ja aluerakenne vuonna 2017. Helsinki: Ministry of Environment; 1995:
68. Kilpailukykyä, hyvinvointia ja ekotehokkuutta: Suomen aluerakenteen ja alueidenkäytön kehityskuva. Suomen Ympäristö 31/2006. Helsinki: Ministry of Environment; 2006:
69. Valtakunnallinen keskusten luokittelu 1973/1974. Helsinki: Ministry of Interior; 1976:
70. Moisio S.Towards attractive and cost-efficient state space: Political geography of the production of state transformation in Finland.World Political Science Review. 2008;4 (3): 1-34
71. Moisio SEurope in the World: EU Geopolitics and the Transformation of European Space. Bialasiewicz L, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2011:19-40.
72. Moisio STowards a Communicative Construction of Spaces. Christmann G, ed. London: Routledge; 2013:
73. Moisio S,Leppänen L.Towards a Nordic competition state? Politico-economic transformation of statehood in Finland, 1965–2005.Fennia. 2007;185 (2): 63-87
74. Moisio S,Luukkonen J.European spatial planning as governmentality: An inquiry into rationalities, techniques and manifestations.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2014;:
75. Moore A.Rethinking scale as a geographical category: From analysis to practice.Progress in Human Geography. 2008;32 (2): 203-225
76. Painter J.Rethinking territory.Antipode. 2010;42 (5): 1090-1118
77. Phelps NA,Tewdwr-Jones M.If geography is anything, maybe it’s planning’s alter ego? Reflections on policy relevance in two disciplines concerned with place and space.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2008;33 (4): 566-584
78. Rovnyi I,Bachmann V.Reflexive geographies of Europeanization.Geography Compass. 2012;6 (5): 260-274
79. Rumford C.Rethinking European spaces: Territory, borders, governance.Comparative European Politics. 2006;4 (2–3): 127-140
80. Schön P.Territorial cohesion in Europe?.Planning Theory and Practice. 2005;6 (3): 389-400
81. Scott AJ.Globalization and the rise of city-regions.European Planning Studies. 2001;9 (7): 813-826
82. Scott JW.Baltic Sea regionalism, EU geopolitics and symbolic geographies of co-operation.Journal of Baltic Studies. 2002;33 (2): 137-155
83. Storper M.The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a Nexus of untraded interdependencies.European Urban and Regional Studies. 1995;2 (3): 191-221
84. Sykes O,Shaw D.Investigating territorial positioning by sub-state territories in Europe.Regional & Federal Studies. 2008;18 (1): 55-76
85. Tewdwr-Jones M,Williams RHThe European Dimension of British Planning. London: Spon Press; 2001:
86. Thomas H.From radicalism to reformism.Planning Theory. 2007;6 (3): 332-335
87. Vartiainen PSuomalaisen aluepolitiikan kehitysvaiheita. Helsinki: Sisäasiainministeriö; 1998:
88. Waterhout B.Episodes of Europeanization of Dutch national spatial planning.Planning Practice & Research. 2007;22 (3): 309-327
89. Williams RHEuropean Union Spatial Policy and Planning. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd; 1996: