Approaching the Internet of things (IoT): A modelling, analysis and abstraction framework

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1966-1984

  Ikram, Ahsan ^a   Anjum, Ashiq ^b   Hill, Richard ^b   Antonopoulos, Nick ^b   Liu, Lu ^b   Sotiriadis, Stelios ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DERBY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

chemical computing; distributed systems; formal modelling; Internet of things

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; BIOMIMETICS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

CHEMICAL COMPUTING; COMMUNICATION MODELS; CONSUMPTION MODELING; CONVERSATIONAL MODEL; DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS; FORMAL MODELLING; INHERENT COMPLEXITY; INTERNET OF THING (IOT);

INTERNET OF THINGS;

EID: 84928124469     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.3131     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ashton K,. That 'Internet of things' Thing. RFID Journal 22 July, 2009.
2. Privat G,. Extending the Internet of things. Digiworld Economic Journal 2012; (87): 101-119.
3. Aggarwal CC, Ashish N, Sheth A,. The Internet of things: a survey from the data-centric. Managing and Mining Sensor Data, (IBM TJ WRC), Aggarwal CC, (ed.). Springer Science+Business Media: New York, US, 2013; 383-428.
4. Gershenfeld N, Krikorian R, Cohen D,. The Internet of things. Scientific American 2011; 291 (4): 76-81.
5. Zakriti A,. Service entities model for the Internet of things. International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS), 2011; 1-5.
6. Banâtre JP, Fradet P, Radenac Y,. Principles of chemical programming. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 2005; 124 (1): 133-147.
7. Dittrich P, Ziegler J, Banzhaf W,. Artificial chemistries-a review. Artificial life 2001; 7 (3): 225-75.
8. Nemeth Z, Perez C, Priol T,. Workflow enactment based on a chemical metaphor. Third IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM05), 2005; 127-136.
9. Németh Z, Pérez C, Priol T,. Distributed workflow coordination: molecules and reactions. Workshop on Nature Inspired Distributed Computing. Proceedings of 20th IEEE International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium, 2006.
10. Wang C, Pazat JL,. Using chemical metaphor to express workflow and service orchestration. 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT 2010), IEEE, 2010; 1504-1511. http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/CIT.2010.268.
11. Di Napoli C, Giordano M, Németh Z, Tonellotto N,. Using chemical reactions to model service composition. Proceeding of the second international workshop on Self-organizing architectures, ACM: New York, New York, USA, 2010; 43-50.
12. Banâtre JP, Fradet P, Radenac Y,. Programming self-organizing systems with the higher-order chemical language. International Journal of Unconventional Computing 2007; 3: 161.
13. Tschudin C, Yamamoto L,. A metabolic approach to protocol resilience. Proceedings of the 1st IFIP Workshop on Autonomic Communication (WAC'04), Berlin, Germany, 2004.
14. Lin H, Kemp J, Molina W,. Parallel computing in chemical reaction metaphor with tuple space. Journal of Computer Science and Security 2010; 4: 149-159.
15. Capra L,. Reflective Mobile Middleware for Context-Aware Applications. University College London: PhD Thesis, London, 2003.
16. Kuo Z, Wuyanni W,. PURPLE: a reflective middleware for pervasive computing. Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA'05), 2005; 64-69.
17. Grace P, Blair GS, Samuel S,. ReMMoC: a reflective middleware to support mobile client interoperability. International Symposium of Distributed Objects and Applications, 2003; 1-18.
18. Chan ATS, Chuang SN,. MobiPADS: a reflective middleware for context-aware mobile computing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2003; 29 (12): 1072-1085.
19. Ramachandra K, Ali HH,. Hydra: a new approach for integrating various wireless environments. Computers and Communications, 2005. ISCC 2005. Proceedings. 10th IEEE Symposium on, 27-30 June 2005; 961-968. DOI: 10.1109/ISCC.2005.81
20. Dobre C,. CAPIM: a platform for context-aware computing. 2011 International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC), 26-28 October 2011; 266-272.
21. Riboni D, Bettini C,. COSAR: hybrid reasoning for context-aware activity recognition. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 2011; 15 (3): 271-289.
22. Gaddah A, Kunz T,. A survey of middleware paradigms for mobile computing. Technical Report SCE-03-16, Carleton University Systems and Computing Engineering, 2003.
23. Hong J, Suh E, Kim S,. Context-aware systems: a literature review and classification. Expert Systems with Applications 2009; 36 (4): 8509-8522. 19-04-2011
24. Java universal network/graph framework (JUNG). http://jung.sourceforge.net/ [Accessed date: April 19, 2011].
25. Kon F, Costa F, Blair G, Campbell RH,. The case for REFLECTIVE middleware. Communications of the ACM 2002; 45 (6): 33-38.
26. Qilin L, Wei Z, Mintian Z,. Research on reflective middleware system. 2009 International Forum on Information Technology and Applications, May 2009; 3-6.
27. Capra L, Blair GS, Mascolo C, Emmerich W, Grace P,. Exploiting reflection in mobile computing middleware. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 2002; 6 (4): 34-44.