A multidimensional resource model for dynamic resource matching in internet of things

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1819-1843

  Zhao, Shuai ^a   Zhang, Yang ^a   Yu, Le ^a   Cheng, Bo ^a   Ji, Yang ^a   Chen, Junliang ^a  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

Author keywords

multidimensional model; resource matching; semantic similarity

Indexed keywords

MIDDLEWARE; SEMANTICS;

DYNAMIC RESOURCES; INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT); IOT RESOURCES; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL MODEL; PHYSICAL WORLD; RESOURCE MATCHING; RESOURCE MODEL; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY;

INTERNET OF THINGS;

EID: 84928110304     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.3170     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ICT FP7 OPENIoT Project. Open source solution for the internet of things into the cloud, 2011. Available from: http://vmusm03.deri.ie/ [Accessed on 20 December 2012].
2. EPFL GSN Project. Global sensor networks project, 2009. Available from: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gsn/ [Accessed on 3 January 2013].
3. Cosm. Cosm platform, 2007. Available from: https://cosm.com/ [Accessed on 20 November 2012].
4. Perera C, Zaslavsky A, Christen P, Compton M, Georgakopoulos D,. Context-aware sensor search, selection and ranking model for internet of things middleware. IEEE 14th International Conference on Mobile Data Management, Milan, Italy. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; 314-322.
5. Cassar G, Barnaghi P, Wang W, Moessner K,. A hybrid semantic matchmaker for iot services. 2012 IEEE International Conference on GreenCom, Besancon, France. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; 210-216.
6. Matthine K,. CASCOM: Intelligent Service Coordination in the Semantic Web. Springer: Basel, 2008; 59-104.
7. Pilioura T, Tsalgatidou A,. Unified publication and discovery of semantic web services. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB) 2009; 3 (3): 1-44.
8. Segev A, Toch E,. Context-based matching and ranking of web services for composition. Services Computing, IEEE Transactions on 2009; 2 (3): 210-222.
9. Platzer C, Rosenberg F, Dustdar S,. Web service clustering using multidimensional angles as proximity measures. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 2009; 9 (3): 1-26.
10. Pan SL, Zhang YX,. Ranked web service matching for service description using OWL-S. WISM 2009: International Conference on Web Information Systems and Mining, Shanghai, China. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; 427-431.
11. Fenza G, Loia V, Senatore S,. A hybrid approach to semantic web services matchmaking. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2008; 48 (3): 808-828.
12. Hau J, Lee W, Darlington J,. A semantic similarity measure for semantic web services. Web Service Semantics Workshop at WWW, Chiba, Japan. ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2005; 10-14.
13. Sussna M,. Word sense disambiguation for free-text indexing using a massive semantic network. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Washington, DC, USA. ACM: New York, NY, USA, 1993; 67-74.
14. Richardson R, Smeaton AF, Murphy J,. Using wordnet as a knowledge base for measuring semantic similarity between words. Technical Report Working Paper CA-1294, School of Computer Applications, Dublin City University, 1994.
15. Resnik P,. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 1999; 11: 95-130.
16. Li Y, Bandar ZA, McLean D,. An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 2003; 15 (4): 871-882.
17. Klusch M, Fries B, Sycara K,. OWLS-mx: A hybrid semantic web service matchmaker for OWL-S services. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 2009; 7 (2): 121-133.
18. d'Amato C, Fanizzi N, Esposito F,. A semantic similarity measure for expressive description logics. arXiv preprint 2009; abs/0911(5043): 1-13.
19. Maximilien EM, Singh MP,. A framework and ontology for dynamic web services selection. Internet Computing, IEEE 2004; 8 (5): 84-93.
20. Christophe B, Verdot V, Toubiana V,. Searching the 'web of things'. 2011 Fifth IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), Palo Alto, CA. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; 308-315.
21. Truong C, Romer K, Chen K,. Fuzzy-based sensor search in the web of things. 2012 3rd International Conference on the Internet of Things (IOT), Wuxi, China. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; 127-134.
22. Klusch M, Kapahnke P,. Adaptive signature-based semantic selection of services with OWLS-MX3. Multiagent and Grid Systems 2012; 8 (1): 69-82.
23. Zhao S, Zhang Y, Chen J,. An ontology based iot resource model for resource evolution and reverse evolution. ICSOC 2012: 10th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing, Shanghai, China. Springer: Berlin, 2012; 779-789.
24. Le-Phuoc D, Quoc HNM, Parreira JX, Hauswirth M,. The linked sensor middleware-connecting the real world and the semantic web. In ISWC 2011 10th International Semantic Web Conference, Bonn, Germany, IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; 1-8.
25. Nath S, Liu J, Zhao F,. Sensormap for wide-area sensor webs. Computer 2007; 40 (7): 90-93.
26. S Mayer DG, Trifa V,. Searching in a web-based infrastructure for smart things. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Internet of Things, Wuxi, China. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; 1-8.
27. Elahi BM, Romer K, Ostermaier B, Fahrmair M, Kellerer W,. Sensor ranking: a primitive for efficient content-based sensor search. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; 217-228.
28. Ostermaier B, Romer K, Mattern F, Fahrmair M, Kellerer W,. A real-time search engine for the web of things. Internet of Things (IOT) 2010, Tokyo, Japan. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; 1-8.
29. Compton M, Neuhaus H, Taylor K, Tran KN,. Reasoning about sensors and compositions. Proceeding of Semantic Sensor Networks 2009, Washington DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; 33-48.
30. Goodwin JC, Russomanno DJ, Qualls J,. Survey of semantic extensions to uddi: implications for sensor services. Proceedings fo the International Conference on Semantic Web and Web Services, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. CSREA Press: Athens, Georgia, USA, 2007; 16-22.
31. Stevenson G, Knox S, Dobson S, Nixon P,. Ontonym: a collection of upper ontologies for developing pervasive systems. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Context, Information and Ontologies: Heraklion, Greece. ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2009; 1-8.
32. Fraden J, King J,. Handbook of modern sensors: physics, designs, and applications. American Journal of Physics 1998; 66 (4): 357-358.
33. De S, Barnaghi P, Bauer M, Meissner S,. Service modelling for the internet of things. 2011 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Szczecin, Poland. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; 949-955.
34. Dong H, Hussain FK, Chang E,. A context-aware semantic similarity model for ontology environments. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 2011; 23 (5): 505-524.
35. Dong H, Hussain FK, Chang E,. A framework for discovering and classifying ubiquitous services in digital health ecosystems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 2011; 77 (4): 687-704.
36. Rada R, Mili H, Bicknell E, Blettner M,. Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on 1989; 19 (1): 17-30.
37. Lin D,. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 2, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 1998; 768-774.