The added value of screening mammography in improved screening for other cancers

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 1, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 597-600

  Carlos, Ruth C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic information; Mammography; Screening; Teachable moment; Value

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SCREENING; COLORECTAL CANCER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 84928096516     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Nutting P.A. Health promotion in primary medical care problems and potential. Prev Med. 15:(5):1986;537-548
2. McBride C.M., Emmons K.M., Lipkus I.M. Understanding the potential of teachable moments the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 18:2003;156-170
3. Hepper N.G., Drage C.W., Daview S.F., et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease a community-oriented program including professional education and screening by a voluntary health agency. Am Rev Respir Dis. 121:1980;97-104
4. Schnoll R.A., Miller S.M., Unger M., McAleer C., Halbherr T., Bradley P. Characteristics of female smokers attending a lung cancer screening program a pilot study with implications for program development. Lung Cancer. 37:2002;257-265
5. Kerlikowkse K., Grady D., Rumin S.M., Sandrock C., Ernster V.L. Efficacy of screening mammography a meta-analysis. JAMA. 273:1995;149-154
6. Gill K.S., Yankaskas B.C. Screening mammography performance and cancer detection among black women and white women in community practice. Cancer. 100:(1):2004;139-148
7. Bree R.L., Bowerman R.A., Bohm-Velez M., Benson C.B., Doubilet P.M., DeDreu S., Punch M.R. US evaluation of the uterus in patients with postmenopausal bleeding a positive effect on diagnostic decision making. Radiology. 216:(1):2000;260-264
8. Lindfors K.K., Rosenquist C.J. The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies. JAMA. 274:(11):1995;881-884
9. Salzmann P., Kerlikowske K., Phillips K. Cost-effectiveness of extending screening mammography guidelines to include women 40 to 49 years of age. Ann Intern Med. 127:(11):1997;955-965
10. Kerlikowske K., Salzmann P., Phillips K.A., Cauley J.A., Cummings S.R. Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness. JAMA. 282:(22):1999;2156-2163
11. Torrance G.W. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal a review. J Health Econ. 5:1986;1-30
12. Lowe J.B., Balanda K.P., Del Mar C., Hawes E. Psychological distress in women with abnormal findings in mass mammography screening. Cancer. 85:1999;1114-1118
13. Aro A.R., Absetz S.P., van Elderen T.M., van der Ploeg E., van der Kamp L.J.T. False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress-breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer. Eur J Cancer. 36:2000;1089-1097
14. Brett J., Austoker J. Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance. J Pub Health Med. 23:2001;292-300
15. Pinckney R.G., Geller B.M., Burman M., Littenberg B. Effect of false-positive mammograms on return for subsequent screening mammography. Am J Med. 114:2003;120-125
16. Pisano E.D., Earp J.A., Gallant T.L. Screening mammography behavior after a false positive mammogram. Radiology. 1998;245-249
17. McCann J., Stockton D., Godward S. Impact of false positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 4:2002;R11
18. Burman M.L., Taplin S.H., Herta D.F., Elmore J.G. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization. Ann Intern Med. 131:1999;1-6