Computer-Based Learning in Medical Education: A Critical View

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 3, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 793-798

  Lee, W Robert ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer based learning; doctor patient communication; medical education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MICROCOMPUTER; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 84928096481     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Institute of Medicine. Health professions education: a bridge to quality (2003), National Academies Press, Washington, DC
2. Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system (1999), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
3. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
4. Association of American Medical Colleges. Assessing change in medical education: the road to implementation (1993), American Association of Medical Colleges, Washington, DC
5. Association of American Medical Colleges. Educating doctors to provide high quality medical care: a vision for medical education in the United States (2004), American Association of Medical Colleges, Washington, DC
6. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education (2001), General Medical Council, London, England
7. Ward J.P., Gordon J., Field M.J., and Lehmann H.P. Communication and information technology in medical education. Lancet 357 (2001) 792-796
8. Kerfoot B.P., Masser B.A., and Hafler J.P. Influence of new educational technology on problem-based learning at Harvard Medical School. Med Educ 39 (2005) 380-387
9. Kern D.E., Branch Jr. W.T., Jackson J.L., et al. Teaching the psychosocial aspects of care in the clinical setting: practical recommendations. Acad Med 80 (2005) 8-20
10. Tosteson D.C. Learning in medicine. N Engl J Med 301 (1979) 690-694
11. Adler M.D., and Johnson K.B. Quantifying the literature of computer-aided instruction in medical education. Acad Med 75 (2000) 1025-1028
12. Letterie G.S. Medical education as a science: the quality of evidence for computer-assisted instruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188 (2003) 849-853
13. Friedman C.P. The research we should be doing. Acad Med 69 (1994) 455-457
14. Cook D.A. The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med 80 (2005) 541-548
15. Clark R. Confounding in educational computing research. J Educ Comput Res 1 (1985) 28-42
16. Mavis B.E., and Smith J.M. Mandatory microcomputers: potential effects on medical school recruitment and admissions (2006). http://www.med-ed-online.org/t0000003.htm Available at: http://www.med-ed-online.org/t0000003.htm. Accessed February 8
17. American Association of Medical Colleges. Facts: applicants, matriculants and graduates: total enrollment by sex and school, 2001-2005 Available at: http://www.aamc.org/data/facts/2005/factsenrl.htm.
18. McNulty J.A., Halama J., Dauzvardis M.F., and Espiritu B. Evaluation of Web-based computer-aided instruction in a basic science course. Acad Med 75 (2000) 59-65
19. McNulty J.A., Espiritu B., and Halsey M. Medical student use of computers correlates with personality. J Int Assoc Med Sci Educators 12 (2002) 9-12
20. Busch T. Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. J Educ Comput Res 12 (1995) 147-158
21. Steele D.J., Johnson Palensky J.E., Lynch T.G., Lacy N.L., and Duffy S.W. Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and student evaluation of computerised instruction. Med Educ 36 (2002) 225-232
22. Hahne A.K., Benndorf R., Frey P., and Herzig S. Attitude towards computer-based learning: determinants as revealed by a controlled interventional study. Med Educ 39 (2005) 935-943
23. Zayim N., Yildirim S., and Saka O. Instructional technology adoption of medical faculty in teaching. Stud Health Technol Inform 116 (2005) 255-260
24. Badge J.L., Cann A.J., and Scott J. E-learning versus e-teaching: seeing the pedagogic wood for the technological trees. Biosci Educ Electronic J 5 (2005). http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol5/beej-5-6.htm Available at: http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol5/beej-5-6.htm.
25. Daniel J.S. The technology adoption life cycle. In: Daniel J.S. (Ed). Mega-universities and knowledge media: technology strategies for higher education (1996), Kogan Page, London
26. Ludmerer K.M., and Johns M.M. Reforming graduate medical education. JAMA 294 (2005) 1083-1087
27. Devitt P., and Palmer E. The role of computers in medical education. Rev Cubana Educ Med Super 15 (2001) 76-84
28. Postman N. Technopoly: the surrender of culture to technology (1992), Vintage, New York
29. Fordis M., King J.E., Ballantyne C.M., et al. Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294 (2005) 1043-1051