Ethical, legal, and social issues related to genomics and cancer research: The impending crisis

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 2, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 919-926

  Ellerin, Bruce E ^a   Schneider, Robert J ^a   Stern, Arnold ^a   Toniolo, Paolo G ^a   Formenti, Silvia C ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidentiality; Conflicts of interest; False Claims Act; Genomics; Informed consent; Privacy

Indexed keywords

CANCER RESEARCH; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMPLOYMENT; GENOMICS; INFORMED CONSENT; INSURANCE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LAW SUIT; LEGAL ASPECT; PRIVACY; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT;

EID: 84928096434     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. Summary of FY 2004 President's budget. Available at: http://www.nih.gov/news/budgetfy2004/fy2004presidentsbudget.pdf.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC/ATSDR procedures for protection of human research participants: 2003. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/od/ads/procphrp.pdf.
3. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Basic HHS policy for protection of human research subjects. 45 CFR § 46:105-23 (§§ 46.101-46.409).
4. M. Anderlik Commercial biobanks and genetic research ethical and legal issues Am J Pharmacogenomics 3 2003 203 215
5. Civil Rights Law, miscellaneous Rights and Immunities, New York State Consolidated Laws, Chap. 6, Art. 7, § 79-l(2)(c).
6. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Guidance for industry. E6 good clinical practice consolidated guidance Fed Reg 62 1996 25691 25709
7. National Institutes of Health National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research The Belmont report ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research 1978 National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research Bethesda (Md)
8. R.H. Gray, T.C. Quinn, D. Serwadda, N.K. Sewankambo, F. Wabwire-Mangen, M.J. Wawer The ethics of research in developing countries N Engl J Med 343 2000 361 362
9. Stephens J. Harvard research in China is faulted: safety, ethics problems of tests noted. The Washington Post. March 30, 2002:A06.
10. Lei X. Harvard research in China: open letter to Pres. Summers. Available at: http://www.researchprotection.org/infomail/0403/12.html.
11. Harvard genetic research in rural China. Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP), Press Release, October 2, 2003. http://www.hartford-hwp.com/ archives/27c/589.html.
12. A farming family's recollection: near-death experience after 55-year-old father of four inhales "fog-like" spray. China Daily. Available at: http://www1.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-09/25/content_267233.htm.
13. Harvard School of Public Health. Conclusion of U.S. government's inquiry into HSPH genetic research in China. Available at: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/ press/releases/press05302003.html.
14. M.A. Austin Ethical issues in human genome epidemiology a case study based on the Japanese American Family Study in Seattle, Washington Am J Epidemiol 155 2002 585 592
15. M.R. Anderlik, M.A. Rothstein Privacy and confidentiality of genetic information what rules for the new science? Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2 2001 401 433
16. Civil rights law, miscellaneous rights and immunities, New York State consolidated laws, chap. 6, art. 7, § 79-l(3)(b).
17. H.C. Black, J.R. Nolan, M.J. Connolly Black's law dictionary definitions of the terms and phrases of American and English jurisprudence, ancient and modern 1979 West St. Paul (Minn)
18. Moore v. Regents of University of California. 51 Cal 3d 120, July 9, 1990. Supreme Court of California, 1990.
19. J.F. Merz, D. Magnus, M.K. Cho, A.L. Caplan Protecting subjects' interests in genetics research Am J Hum Genet 70 2002 965 971
20. C.H. Harrison Neither Moore nor the market alternative models for compensating contributors of human tissue Am J Law Med 28 2002 77 105
21. J.S. Pober, C.S. Neuhauser, J.M. Pober Obstacles facing translational research in academic medical centers FASEB J 15 2001 2303 2313
22. J.B. Martin, D.L. Kasper In whose best interest? Breaching the academic-industrial wall N Engl J Med 343 2000 1646 1649
23. Association of American Medical Colleges, Task Force on Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research. Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress_policy and guidelines for the oversight of individual financial interests in human subjects research. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/members/coitf/firstreport.pdf.
24. Association of American Medical Colleges, Task Force on Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research. Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress II: principles and recommendations for oversight of an institution's financial interests in human subjects research. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/members/coitf/2002coireport.pdf.
25. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Pub. L. 104-191.
26. http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/genetics/ndishlth.htm
27. http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/genetics/ndislife.htm
28. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 45 USC § 12101, 1990.
29. National Workrights Institute. Genetic discrimination and the Americans with Disabilities Act: an unlikely fit. Available at: http://www.workrights.org/ issue_genetic/gd_ada.html.
30. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research involving human biological materials: ethical issues and policy guidance: vol. I. Available at: http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/pubs.html
31. False Claims Act. 12 Stat. 696, 1863.
32. False Claims Amendments Act of 1986. Pub. L. 99-562, 1986.
33. The False Claims Act Resource Center. Brief history of qui tam provisions. Available at: http://www.falseclaimsact.com/history.html.
34. Hawryluk M. Health care now prime target of federal False Claims Act. Am Med News May 10, 2004, http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2004/ind04.htm#05.
35. Cook County, Illinois v. United States ex rel. Chandler. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. No. 01-1572. Argued January 14, 2003. Decided March 10, 2003, US Supreme Court, 2003.
36. P.E. Kalb, K.G. Koehler Legal issues in scientific research JAMA 287 2002 85 91