The effect of incorporating guidelines into a computerized order entry system for diagnostic imaging

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 251-258

  Bowen, Sarah ^a   Johnson, Keir ^b   Reed, Martin H ^c   Zhang, Liping ^b   Curry, Lynn ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b WINNIPEG REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^d CurryCorp Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computerized order entry system; decision support; evaluation research; mixed methods

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTERIZED PROVIDER ORDER ENTRY; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; NONHUMAN; PATIENT INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

EID: 84928096383     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.11.020     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations. Radiology 2005;234:824-32. (Pubitemid 40250826)
2. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Medical imaging technologies in Canada, 2005. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2006.
3. Picano E. Sustainability of medical imaging. BMJ 2004;328:578-80. (Pubitemid 38316634)
4. Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4:272-84. (Pubitemid 46671375)
5. Stein LA. Making the best use of radiological resources in Canada. Healthc Pap 2005;6:18-23.
6. Canadian Association of Radiologists. Diagnostic imaging referral guidelines: a guide for physicians. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Association of Radiologists; 2005.
7. Royal College of Radiologists. Making the best use of clinical radiology services: referral guidelines. 6th ed. London: Royal College of Radiologists; 2007.
8. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R, et al. Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21(suppl):S14-20.
9. Garg A, Adhikari N, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38. (Pubitemid 40327908)
10. Rosenthal DI, Weilburg JB, Schultz T, et al. Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience. J Am Coll Radiol 2006;3: 799-806. (Pubitemid 44442007)
11. Sanders DL, Miller RA. The effects on clinician ordering patterns of a computerized decision support system for neuroradiology imaging studies. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:583-7.
12. Sistrom CL, Dang PA, Weilburg JB, et al. Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. Radiology 2009;251:147-55.
13. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Poon EG, Guappone K, Campbell E, Dykstra RH. The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:415-23. (Pubitemid 46963036)
14. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:740-1.
15. Niès J, Colombet I, Degoulet P, Durieux P. Determinants of success for computerized clinical decision support systems integrated in CPOE systems: a systematic review. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:594-8.
16. Mollon B, Chong J Jr, Holbrook AM, Sung M, Thabane L, Foster G. Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009;9:11.
17. Bairstow PJ, Persaud J, Mendelson R, Nguyen L. Reducing inappropriate diagnostic practice through education and decision support. Int J Qual Health Care 2010;22:194-200.
18. Johnson K, Bowen S, Zhang L, et al. Evaluation of the Manitoba Demonstration Project in Physician Demand-Side Control for Diagnostic Imaging: January 2006-August 2007. Winnipeg, Canada: Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, Research and Evaluation Unit; 2007.
19. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
20. Grol R. Has guideline development gone astray? BMJ 2010;340:394-5.
21. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge translation learning modules. Available at: http://www.cihr.ca/e/39128.html.