Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 1, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 984-987

  Halsted, Mark J ^a  

^a CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DATA BASE; ERROR; FOLLOW UP; LEARNING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PEER REVIEW; RADIOLOGIST; RADIOLOGY; REVIEW;

EID: 84928096182     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Home page. Available at: http://www.jcaho.org. Accessed April 2, 2004.
2. To err is human building a safer health system 2000 National Academy Press Washington (DC) 287: xxi
3. Institute of Medicine Crossing the quality chasm a new health system for the 21st century 2001 National Academy Press Washington (DC)
4. R.D. McFadden Mammograms done at clinic may be flawed, state says The New York Times 2003 B4 November 7
5. M. Moss Mammogram team learns from its errors The New York Times 2002 A1 June 28
6. M. Moss, J. Steinhauer Blurred vision; mammogram clinic's flaws highlight gaps in U.S. rules The New York Times 2002 A1 October 24
7. K.W. McEnery, C.T. Suitor, S. Hildebrand, R.L. Downs Integration of radiologist peer review into clinical review workstation J Digital Imaging 13 2 suppl 1 2000 101 104
8. M.J. Halsted, H. Kumar, J.J. Paquin Diagnostic errors by radiology residents in interpreting pediatric radiographs in an emergency setting Ped Radiol 34 2004 331 336
9. L. Berlin Performance improvement and peer-review activities are they immune from legal discovery? Am J Roentgenol 181 2003 649 653