Does supervision matter?

Prisoner Reentry and Crime in America

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 105-138

  Piehl, Anne Morrison ^a   Lobuglio, Stefan F ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Montgomery County Department of Correction and Rehabilitation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928094002     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511813580.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Burke, P. B. 1997. Policy-Driven Responses to Probation and Parole Violations. Silver Spring, MD: Center for Effective Public Policy.
2. Campbell, R. 2003. Dollars & Sentences: Legislators’ Views on Prisons, Punishment, and the Budget Crisis. New York: Vera Institute.
3. Criminal Justice Policy Council. 2002.Trends, Profile, and Policy Issues Related to Felony Probation Revocations in Texas. Austin, TX: Criminal Justice Policy Council.
4. Ditton, P. M., and D. J. Wilson. 1999. Truth in Sentencing in State Prisons. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
5. Ehrenreich, B. 2001. Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting by in America. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
6. Gifford, S. L. 2002. Justice Expenditure and Employment in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
7. Glaser, D. 1964. The Effectiveness of a Prison and Parole System. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company.
8. Glaser, D. 1995. Preparing Convicts for Law-Abiding Lives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9. Glaze, L. E. 2002. Probation and Parole in the United States, 2001.Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
10. Heymann, P. B. 2000. “The New Policing.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 28: 407.
11. Hughes, T. A., D. J. Wilson, and A. J. Beck. 2001. Trends in State Parole, 1990–2000. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
12. Kelling, G., and C. Coles. 1996. Fixing Broken Windows: Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities. New York: The Free Press.
13. Kennedy, D. M., A. A. Braga, and A. M. Piehl. 2001. Reducing Gun Violence: Developing and Implementing Operation Ceasefire. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
14. Kleiman, M. 1999. “Community Corrections as the Front Line in Crime Control.” UCLA Law Review 46(6):1909–1925.
15. Langan, P. 1994. “Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Sanctions.” Science 264: 791–793.
16. Langan, P. A., and D. J. Levin. 2002. Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
17. Lynch, J. P., and W. J. Sabol. 2001. Prisoner Reentry in Perspective. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
18. Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety. 2003. 2002–2003 Annual Report. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Department of Correction.
19. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2003. State Budget & Tax Actions 2003. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.
20. Petersilia, J. 1999. “Parole and Prisoner Reentry in the United States,” M. Tonry and J. Petersilia, eds., Prisons, vol. 26, p. 554. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Petersilia, J. 2003. When Prisoners Come Home. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Petersilia, J., and S. Turner. 1993. “Intensive Probation and Parole,” M. H. Tonry, ed., Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, p. 17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Piehl, A. M. 2002. From Cell to Street: A Plan to Supervise Inmates After Release. Boston: Massachusetts Institute for a New Commonwealth.
24. Piehl, A. M., B. Useem, and J. J. DiIulio Jr. 1999. Right-Sizing Justice: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Imprisonment in Three States. New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Center for Civic Innovation.
25. Reitz, Kevin R. 2004. “Questioning the Conventional Wisdom of Parole Release Authority,” M. Tonry, ed., The Future of Imprisonment. New York: Oxford University Press: 199–235.
26. Sabol, William J., Katherine Rosich, Kamala Mallik Kane, David Kirk, and Glenn Dubin. 2002. The Influence of Truth-in-Sentencing Reforms on Changes in States’ Sentencing Practices and Prison Populations. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press. Available at: http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410470 FINALTISrpt.pdf (Accessed January 24, 2005).
27. Sutherland, E. H. 1924. Principles of Criminology. New York: J. B. Lippincott.
28. Tonry, M. 2000. “Fragmentation of Sentencing and Corrections in America.” Alternatives to Incarceration 6(2): 9–13.
29. Travis, J. 2003. Parole in California 1980–2000: Implications for Reform, Testimony before Little Hoover Commission. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
30. Travis, J., and S. Lawrence. 2002. Beyond the Prison Gates: The State of Parole in America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
31. U.S. Department of Justice. 2003. Expenditure and Employment Statistics, 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
32. U.S. Department of Justice. 1999. Integrating Drug Testing into a Pretrial Services System. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.
33. West, L., and D. Ackerman. 1993. “The Drug-Testing Controversy.” Journal of Drug Issues 23: 579.
34. Wilson, J. Q., and G. Kelling. March 1982. “Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety.” The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 249, No. 3; pages 29–38.