Science and government

The Cambridge History of Science: Eighteenth-Century Science

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 107-128

  Fox, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928087102     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.006     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Martha Ornstein, The Role of Scientific Societies in the Seventeenth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1928).
2. James E. McClellan III, Science Reorganized: Scientific Societies in the Eighteenth Century (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985), pp 41-66.
3. David C. Goodman and Colin A. Russell, The Rise ofScientific Europe 1500-1800 (Sevenoaks: Hodder & Stoughton and The Open University, 1991).
4. Roger Hahn, The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666-1805 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971), pp 19-26.
5. Alice Stroup, “The Political Theory and Practice of Technology under Louis XIV,” in Bruce T. Moran (ed.), Patronage and Institutions: Science, Technology and Medicine at the European Court 1500-1550 (Rochester, NY: Boydell Press, 1991), pp 211-34.
6. Charles Wolf, Histoire de l’Observatoirede Paris de sa fondation à 1793 (Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1902), pp 2-4.
7. Adolf Harnack, Geschichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 3 vols. (Berlin: Reichsdruckerei, 1900), vol. 1, pp 27-492.
8. Alexander Vucinich, Science in Russian Culture: A History to 1860 (London: Peter Owen, 1963), pp 38-122.
9. Colin A. Russell, “Science on the Fringe of Europe: Eighteenth-Century Sweden,” in Goodman and Russell (eds.), The Rise of Scientific Europe, pp 303-32.
10. Sten Lindroth, Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Historia 1739-1818, 2 vols. (Stockholm: Kungl. Vetenskapsakademien, 1967).
11. Ulf Sinnerstad, “Astronomy and the First Observatory,” in Tore Frangsmyr (ed.), Science in Sweden: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 1739-1989 (Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1989), pp 43-71,48-30.
12. Ulf Sinnerstad, “Astronomy and the First Observatory,” pp 55.
13. Daniel Roche, Le siècle des lumières en province: Académies et académiciens provinciaux, 1680-1789, 2 vols. (Paris: Mouton, 1978).
14. Luisa Dolza, “Dyeing in Piedmont in the Late Eighteenth Century,” Archivesinternationales d’histoire des sciences, 46 (1996), 75-83.
15. Lusia Dolza, “The Struggle for Technological Independence: Textiles and Dyeing in Eighteenth-century Piedmont” (University of Oxford M.Litt. thesis, 1995), chap. 3.
16. Larry Stewart, The Rise of Public Science: Rhetoric, Technology, and Natural Philosophy in Newtonian Britain, 1660-1750 (Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp 213-54.
17. Steven Shapin, “Property, Patronage, and the Politics of Science: The Founding of the Royal Society of Edinburgh,” The British Journal for the History of Science, 7 (1974), 1-41.
18. Henry Trueman Wood, A History of the Royal Society of Arts (London: John Murray, 1913), pp 20-2.
19. Derek Hudson and Kenneth H. Luckhurst, The Royal Society of Arts 1754-1954 (London: John Murray, 1954), pp 3-18.
20. Roger Hahn, The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution, pp 116-24.
21. Charles Coulston Gillispie, Science and Polity in France at the End of the Old Regime (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980), pp 390-413.
22. Jean Hellot, L’art de la teinture des laines et des étoffes de laine en grand et petit teint (Paris, 1750).
23. Michelle Sadoun-Goupil, Le chimiste Claude-Louis Berthollet (1748-1822). Sa vie, son oeuvre (Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1977), pp 21-4.
24. Michelle Sadoun-Goupil,“Science pure et science appliquée dans l’oeuvre de Claude-Louis Berthollet,” Revue d’histoire des sciences, 27 (1974), 127-45, 127-33,140-5.
25. J. A. Chaptal, Elemens de chimie, 3 vols. (Montpellier, 1790), vol. 1, p. 52.
26. Barbara Whitney Keyser, “Between Science and Craft: The Case of Berthollet and Dyeing,” Annals of Science, 47 (1990), 231-60.
27. Claude-Louis Berthollet, Eléments de l’art de la teinture, 2 vols. (Paris, 1791), vol. 1, p. 42.
28. Patrice Bret, “Lavoisier et l’apport de la chimie académique à l’industrie des poudres et salpêtres,” Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences, 46 (1996), 57-74.
29. André Doyon and Lucien Liaigre, Jacques Vaucanson: Mécanicien de génie (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1966), pp 175-253.
30. Christine MacLeod, Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1660-1800 (Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp 115-200.
31. Joaquín Fernández and Ignacio González Tascón, Ciencia, técnica y estado en la España ilustrada (Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, 1990).
32. Agusti Nieto-Galan, “Dyeing, Calico Printing and Technical Exchanges in Spain: The Royal Manufactures and the Catalan Textile Industry, 1750-1820,” in Robert Fox and Agusti Nieto-Galan (eds.), Natural Dyestuffs and Industrial Culture in Europe, 1750-1880 (Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1999), pp 101-28.
33. James K. J. Thomson, “State Intervention in the Catalan Calico-printing Industry in the Eighteenth Century,” in Maxine Berg (ed.), Markets and Manufacture in Early Industrial Europe (London: Routledge, 1991), 57-89.
34. James K. J. Thomson, Distinctive Industrialization: Cotton in Barcelona, 1728-1852 (Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp 40-6, 67-72, 132-8, 157-9, 202-5.
35. Ramón Gago, “The New Chemistry in Spain,” Osiris, 2nd ser. 4 (1988), 169-92.
36. Agusti Nieto-Galan, “Un projet régional de chimie appliquée à la fin du XVIIIe siècle. Montpellier et son influence à l’école de Barcelone: Chaptal et Francesc Carbonell,” Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences, 44 (1994), 38-62.
37. Agusti Nieto-Galan, “The French Chemical Nomenclature in Spain: Critical Points, Rhetorical Arguments, and Practical Uses,” in Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent and Ferdinando Abbri (eds.), Lavoisier in European Context: Negotiating a New Language for Chemistry (Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1995), pp 173-91.
38. Claude-Louis Berthollet, Elementos del arte de teñir, trans. Domingo García Fernández, 2 vols. (Madrid,1795).
39. Anders Lundgren, “The New Chemistry in Sweden: The Debate That Wasn’t,” Osiris, 2nd ser. 4 (1988), 146-68.
40. Svante Lindqvist, Technology on Trial: The Introduction of Steam Power Technology into Sweden, 1715-172,6 (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1984).
41. Sven Rydberg, The Great Copper Mine: The Stora Story (Hedemora: Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB in collaboration with Gidlunds Publishers, 1988), pp 85-160.
42. Svante Lindqvist, Technology on Trial, pp 67-79.
43. Gerrylynn K. Roberts, “Establishing Science in Eighteenth-Century Central Europe,” in Goodman and Russell (eds.), The Rise of Scientific Europe, pp 361-86,373-83.
44. Abraham Gottlob Werner, Von den äusserlichen Kennzeichen der Fossilien (Leipzig, 1774).
45. Rachel Laudan, From Mineralogy to Geology: The Foundations of a Science, 1650-1830 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), pp 87-112.
46. Lissa Roberts, “Establishing Science in Eighteenth-Century Central Europe,” pp 380-3.
47. D. M. Farrer, “The Royal Hungarian Mining Academy, Schemnitz: Some Aspects of Technical Education in the Eighteenth Century” (University of Manchester M.Sc. thesis, 1971).
48. Antoine Picon, L’invention de l’ingénieur moderne: L’Ecole des Ponts et Chaussées 1747-1851 (Paris: Presses de l’Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, 1992).
49. Charles Gillispie, Science and Polity in France, p. 495.
50. Arthur Young, Travels, during the Years 1787, 1788 and 1787. Undertaken more particularly with a View of ascertaining the Cultivation, Wealth, Resources, and National Prosperity, of the Kingdom of France (Bury St. Edmunds, 1792), vol. 1, p. 20.
51. Louis-Alexandre de Cessart, Descriptiondes travaux hydrauliques de Louis-Alexandre de Cessart, 2 vols. plus 1 vol. of plates (Paris: A. A. Renouard, 1806-1808).
52. Roger Hahn, “L’enseignement scientifique aux écoles militaires et d’artillerie,” and René Taton, “L’Ecole royale du Génie de Mézières,” in Enseignement et diffusion des sciences en France au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Hermann, 1964), pp 513-45,559-615.
53. René Taton, L’oeuvre scientifique de Monge (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1951), pp 10-19, 50-100, 352-75.
54. Santiago Riera i Tuèbols, “Industrialization and Technical Education in Spain, 1850-1914,” in Robert Fox and Anna Guagnini (eds.), Education, Technology and Industrial Performance in Europe, 1850- 1939 (Cambridge University Press, and Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 1993), pp 146-70.
55. Margaret Bradley, “Engineers as Military Spies? French Engineers Come to Britain, 1780-1790,” Annals of Science, 49 (1992), 137-61.
56. John R. Harris, Essays in Industry and Technology in the Eighteenth Century: England and France (Aldershot: Variorum, 1992), 164-73.
57. Gabriel Jars, Voyagesmétallurgiques ou recherches et observations sur les mines et forges de fer. faites en 1758, jusques & compris 1777, en Allemagne, en Suede [sic], Angleterre… & en Hollande, 3 vols. (Lyon, 1774-1781).
58. Jacques Payen, Capital et machine à vapeur: Les frères Périer et l’introduction en France de la machine à vapeur de Watt (Paris: Mouton, 1969), pp 137-9.
59. Alan Q. Morton and Jane A. Wess, Public & Private Science: The King George III Collection (Oxford: Oxford University Press in association with the Science Museum, 1993), pp 89-127.
60. John Cawte Beaglehole, The Life of Captain James Cook (London: Adam & Charles Black, 1974).
61. Harry Woolf, The Transits of Venus: A Study of Eighteenth-Century Science (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1939), pp 161-70.
62. Louis Antoine, Count Bougainville, Voyage autour du monde par la frégate du roi la Boudeuse, et la flûte l’Etoile, en 1766,1767, 1768, & 1767 (Paris, 1771).
63. Numa Broc, La géographie des philosophes: Géographes et voyageurs français au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Editions Ophrys, 1975).
64. Anthony G. Randall, “The Timekeeper That Won the Longitude Prize,” in William J. H. Andrewes (ed.), The Quest for Longitude (Cambridge, MA: Collection of Scientific Instruments, Harvard University, 1996), pp 236-54.
65. Henry Marie Auguste Berthaut, La carte de France 1750-1898, 2 vols. (Paris: Imprimerie du Service Géographique [de l’Armée], 1898-1899), vol. 1, pp 48-70.
66. Rhoda Rappaport, “The Geological Atlas of Guettard, Lavoisier, and Monnet: Conflicting Views on the Nature of Geology,” in Cecil J. Schneer (ed.), Toward a History of Geology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969), pp 272-87.
67. Ana Simoes, Ana Carneiro, and Maria Paula Diogo, “Constructing Knowledge: Eighteenth-century Portugal and the New Sciences,” in Kostas Gavroglu (ed.), The Sciences in the European Periphery during the Enlightenment [Archimedes, vol. 2] (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), pp 1-40.