POSITION STATEMENT UPDATE: PROPER PERFORMANCE AND INTERPRETATION OF ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC STUDIES

Muscle and Nerve

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 468-471

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NERVE CONDUCTION; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMANS; NEURAL CONDUCTION; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84928055505     PISSN: 0148639X     EISSN: 10974598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/MUS.24587     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. AANEM Recommended Policy for Electrodiagnostic Accessed September 13, 2005. Approved by the American Medicine: September 1997; updated 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2004. Endorsed by the American Academy of Neurology: February 1998, February 2002, and June 2004. Endorsed by the American Academy of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation: June 1998, March 2002, and June 2004.
2. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General Work Plan Fiscal Year 2004. Available at http://oig.hhs.gov/reading/workplan/200/Work%20Plan%202004pdf. Accessed September 13, 2005.
3. Werner RA, Cavender GD: Evaluating rediculopathy: How useful is electrodiagnostic testing. Phy Med Rehabil: State of the Art Review 1999; 13 (2): 251-261.