Legal language and social change during Colombia’s economic crisis

Cultures of Legality Judicialization and political Activism in Latin America

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 25-50

  Rueda, Pablo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928053122     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511730269.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckman. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
2. Correa, Patricia. 2000. “Public Debt, Public Debt Market, and Monetary Policy in Colombia.” Borradores de Econom'ýa, 147, Bogot'a, Colombia: Banco de la Republica.
3. Conley, John M. and William M. O’Barr. 2005. Just Words: Law, Language, and Power (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
4. Dugas, John C. 2001. “The Origin, Impact, and Demise of the 1989–1990 Colombian Student Movement: Insights from Student Movement Theory.” Journal of Latin American Studies, 33: 807–37.
5. Echeverry, Juan Carlos. 1999. UPAC: Evolution and Crisis of a Model of Development, Archivos de Econom'ýa 129. Bogota, Colombia: NPD.
6. Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Studies and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of Political Science, 7. F. Greenstein and N. Polsby, eds. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Gerring, John. 2001. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Toward Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Kalmanovitz, Salom'on. 2001. Constituci on y Modelo Econ'omico, Paper presented at the ILSA Seminar on the 10th Anniversary of the Colombian Constitution. Bogota, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
10. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2002. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
11. Koselleck, Reinhart. 1995. “A Response to Comments on the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe.” In The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, Hartmut Lehman and Melvin Richter, eds. Washington D.C.: German Historical Institute.
12. Lakoff, George. 2007. Whose Freedom? The Battle over America’s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
13. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Mitchell, Timothy. 1990. “Everyday Metaphors of Power.” Theory and Society, 19: 545–77.
15. Mertz, Elizabeth. 1994. “A New Social Constructivism for Sociolegal Studies.” Law and Society Review, 1243–65.
16. Phillips, Scott and Ryken Grattet. 2000. “Judicial Rhetoric, Meaning Making, and the Institutionalization of Hate Crime Law.” Law and Society Review, 34: 567–606.
17. Shapiro, Martin and Alec Stone Sweet. 2002. “Testing, Comparison, Prediction.” In On Law, Politics and Judicialization, Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Siegel, Reva B. 2006. “Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict, and the Constitutional Change: The Case of the de facto ERA – 2005–06 Brennan Center Symposium Lecture.” California Law Review, 94: 1323.
19. Stone Sweet, Alec. 2002. “The Success of Judicial Review and Democracy.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Syrett, Keith. 1998. “‘Immunity,’ ‘Privilege,’ and ‘Right’: British Trade Unions and the Language of Labor Reform.” Journal of Law and Society, 25: 388–406.
21. Wahlbeck, Paul J. 1998. “The Development of a Legal Rule: The Federal Common Law of Public Nuisance.” Law and Society Review, 32: 613–38.
22. Weissbourd, Bernard and Elizabeth Mertz. 1985. “Rule Centrism Versus Legal Creativity: The Skewing of Legal Ideology Through Language.” Law and Society Review, 19: 623–59.