Shapely DNA attracts the right partner

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 15, 2015, Pages 4516-4517

  Przytycka, Teresa M ^a   Levens, David ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA FRAGMENT; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; DNA;

BINDING SITE; CELL ACTIVITY; DNA BINDING; DNA CONFORMATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; RESTRICTION SITE; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; HUMAN; METABOLISM;

ANIMALS; DNA; HUMANS; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84928041754     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503951112     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Schneider TD (2010) 70% efficiency of bistate molecular machines explained by information theory, high dimensional geometry and evolutionary convergence. Nucleic Acids Res 38(18):5995-6006.
2. Stormo GD, Schneider TD, Gold LM (1982) Characterization of translational initiation sites in E. coli. Nucleic Acids Res 10(9): 2971-2996.
3. Zhou T, et al. (2015) Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:4654-4659.
4. Berger MF, et al. (2006) Compact, universal DNA microarrays to comprehensively determine transcription-factor binding site specificities. Nat Biotechnol 24(11):1429-1435.
5. Ellington AD, Szostak JW (1990) In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature 346(6287):818-822.
6. Tuerk C, Gold L (1990) Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science 249(4968):505-510.
7. Jolma A, et al. (2013) DNA-binding specificities of human transcription factors. Cell 152(1-2):327-339.
8. Liu J, Stormo GD (2005) Combining SELEX with quantitative assays to rapidly obtain accurate models of protein-DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 33(17):e141.
9. Stormo GD (2013) Modeling the specificity of protein-DNA interactions. Quant Biol 1(2):115-130.
10. Agius P, Arvey A, Chang W, Noble WS, Leslie C (2010) High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions. PLoS Comput Biol 6(9): e1000916.
11. Weirauch MT, et al.; DREAM5 Consortium (2013) Evaluation of methods for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity. Nat Biotechnol 31(2):126-134.
12. Rohs R, et al. (2009) The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature 461(7268):1248-1253.
13. Zhou T, et al. (2013) DNAshape: A method for the high-throughput prediction of DNA structural features on a genomic scale. Nucleic acids Res 41(Web Server issue):W56-W62.
14. Djordjevic M, Sengupta AM, Shraiman BI (2003) A biophysical approach to transcription factor binding site discovery. Genome Res 13(11):2381-2390.
15. Zhao Y, Granas D, Stormo GD (2009) Inferring binding energies from selected binding sites. PLoS Comput Biol 5(12):e1000590.
16. Persikov AV, et al. (2015) A systematic survey of the Cys2His2 zinc finger DNA-binding landscape. Nucleic Acids Res 43(3):1965-1984.
17. Kouzine F, Liu J, Sanford S, Chung HJ, Levens D (2004) The dynamic response of upstream DNA to transcription-generated torsional stress. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11(11):1092-1100.