Seeing the forests and the trees-innovative approaches to exploring heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions to enhance health system decision-making: A protocol

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Ivers, Noah ^a   Tricco, Andrea C ^b   Trikalinos, Thomas A ^c   Dahabreh, Issa J ^c   Danko, Kristin J ^d   Moher, David ^d,e   Straus, Sharon E ^b   Lavis, John N ^f   Yu, Catherine H ^b   Shojania, Kaveh ^g   Manns, Braden ^h,i   Tonelli, Marcello ⁱ   Ramsay, Timothy ^d,e   Edwards, Alun ⁱ   Sargious, Peter ⁱ   Paprica, Alison ^j   Hillmer, Michael ^j,k   Grimshaw, Jeremy M ^d,e  

^a WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^f MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^k ONTARIO MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND LONG TERM CARE   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Complex Interventions; Diabetes care; Health system decision makers; Heterogeneity; Hierarchical modeling; Implementation science; Knowledge translation; Meta analysis; Quality improvement interventions; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PATIENT EDUCATION; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CARE; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; STANDARDS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; DIABETES MELLITUS; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84928014188     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-88     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care 2001, 39:II46-II54.
2. Mangione-Smith R, DeCristofaro AH, Setodji CM, Keesey J, Klein DJ, Adams JL, Schuster MA, McGlynn EA. The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:1515-1523. 10.1056/NEJMsa064637, 17928599.
3. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:2635-2645. 10.1056/NEJMsa022615, 12826639.
4. Lomas J, Brown AD. Research and advice giving: a functional view of evidence-informed policy advice in a Canadian Ministry of Health. Milbank Q 2009, 87:903-926. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00583.x, 2888020, 20021590.
5. Anderson LM, Petticrew M, Chandler J, Grimshaw J, Tugwell P, O'Neill J, Welch V, Squires J, Churchill R, Shemilt I. Introducing a series of methodological articles on considering complexity in systematic reviews of interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 2013, 66:1205-1208. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.005, 23953080.
6. Dixon-Woods M, Bosk CL, Aveling EL, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. Milbank Q 2011, 89:167-205. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00625.x, 3142336, 21676020.
7. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles MP, Cane J, Wood CE. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med 2013, 46:81-95. 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6, 23512568.
8. Stevens DP, Shojania KG. Tell me about the context, and more. BMJ Qual Saf 2011, 20:557-559. 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000206, 21685496.
9. Noyes J, Gough D, Lewin S, Mayhew A, Michie S, Pantoja T, Petticrew M, Pottie K, Rehfuess E, Shemilt I, Shepperd S, Sowden A, Tugwell P, Welch V. A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 2013, 66:1262-1270. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.003, 23953084.
10. Michie S, Fixsen D, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci 2009, 4:40. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-40, 2717906, 19607700.
11. Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM, Taylor SL, Dy SM, Foy R, Hempel S, McDonald KM, Ovretveit J, Rubenstein LV, Adams AS, Angood PB, Bates DW, Bickman L, Carayon P, Donaldson L, Duan N, Farley DO, Greenhalgh T, Haughom J, Lake ET, Lilford R, Lohr KN, Meyer GS, Miller MR, Neuhauser DV, Ryan G, Saint S, Shojania KG, Shortell SM, et al. Advancing the science of patient safety. Ann Intern Med 2011, 154:693-696. 10.7326/0003-4819-154-10-201105170-00011, 21576538.
12. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, Altman DG, Barbour V, Macdonald H, Johnston M, Lamb SE, Dixon-Woods M, McCulloch P, Wyatt JC, Chan AW, Michie S. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014, 348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.:g1687, 10.1136/bmj.g1687, 24609605.
13. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough. Lancet 1998, 351:123-127. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08468-7, 9439507.
14. Improving Population Health: the Uses of Systematic Reviews. [http://www.milbank.org/uploads/documents/0712populationhealth/0712populationhealth.html].
15. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG,. on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration, Higgins JPT, Green S, on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group.
16. Saydah SH, Eberhardt MS, Loria CM, Brancati FL. Age and the burden of death attributable to diabetes in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 2002, 156:714-719. 10.1093/aje/kwf111, 12370159.
17. IDF Diabetes Atlas 2009, Brussels: International Diabetes Federation.
18. Haffner S. Coronary heart disease in patients with diabetes. New Engl J Med 2000, 342:1040-1042. 10.1056/NEJM200004063421408, 10749967.
19. Tricco AC, Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Moher D, Turner L, Galipeau J, Halperin I, Vachon B, Ramsay T, Manns B, Tonelli M, Shojania K. Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012, 379:2252-2261. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60480-2, 22683130.
20. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration.
21. Ivers NM, Tricco AC, Taljaard M, Halperin I, Turner L, Moher D, Grimshaw JM. Quality improvement needed in quality improvement randomised trials: systematic review of interventions to improve care in diabetes. BMJ Open 2013, 3:e002727. 3641459, 23576000.
22. Higgins JP, Whitehead A, Turner RM, Omar RZ, Thompson SG. Meta-analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients. Stat Med 2001, 20:2219-2241. 10.1002/sim.918, 11468761.
23. Turner RM, Omar RZ, Yang M, Goldstein H, Thompson SG. A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes. Stat Med 2000, 19:3417-3432. 10.1002/1097-0258(20001230)19:24<3417::AID-SIM614>3.0.CO;2-L, 11122505.
24. Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Adamopoulos E, Vedhara K. Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of complex interventions: psychological interventions in coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol 2009, 169:1158-1165. 10.1093/aje/kwp014, 19258485.
25. Senn S. Hans van Houwelingen and the art of summing up. Biom J 2010, 52:85-94. 10.1002/bimj.200900074, 20140900.
26. Van HH, Senn S. Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat Med 1999, 18:110-115. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990115)18:1<110::AID-SIM14>3.0.CO;2-C, 9990698.
27. van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med 2002, 21:589-624. 10.1002/sim.1040, 11836738.
28. Olkin I, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA. GOSH - a graphical display of study heterogeneity. Res Syn Meth 2012, 3:214-223.
29. Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?. BMJ 2008, 336:1472-1474. 10.1136/bmj.39590.732037.47, 2440840, 18583680.
30. Gagnon ML. Moving knowledge to action through dissemination and exchange. J Clin Epidemiol 2011, 64:25-31. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.013, 20004552.
31. Ross S, Lavis J, Rodriguez C, Woodside J, Denis JL. Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003, 8(Suppl 2):26-34. 10.1258/135581903322405144, 14596745.
32. Kothari A, Wathen CN. A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy 2013, 109:187-191. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.11.004, 23228520.
33. Glossary of Funding Related Terms. [http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/34190.html#k].
34. Tricco AC, Galipeau J, Turner L, Moher D, Ivers N, Halperin I, Vachon B, Ramsay T, Shojania KG, Grimshaw JM. Improving diabetes care: updated and expanded systematic review of diabetes quality improvement strategies 2010, Report prepared for the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care: Ottawa.
35. Wallace BC, Schmid CH, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009, 9:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-80.:80-89, 10.1186/1471-2288-9-80, 2795760, 19961608.
36. Wallace BC, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Trow P, Schmid CH. Closing the gap between methodologists and end-users: R as a computational back-end. J Stat Software 2012, 49(5):1-15. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v49/i05.
37. Plummer MJAGS. A Program for Analysis of Bayesian Graphical Models Using Gibbs Sampling. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (DSC 2003) 2003, Vienna, Austria.
38. Shojania KG, Ranji SR, McDonald KM, Grimshaw JM, Sundaram V, Rushakoff RJ, Owens DK. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA 2006, 296:427-440. 10.1001/jama.296.4.427, 16868301.
39. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O'Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, 6:CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.:CD000259.
40. Chaudry SH. Challenges in the ethical conduct and ethics review of cluster randomized trials: a survey of cluster randomization trialists. (MSc thesis), PhD Thesis 2011, University of Ottawa.
41. Dillman DA. The design and administration of mail surveys. Annu Rev Sociol 1991, 17:225-248.
42. Lavis JN, Boyko JA, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 14: organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst 2009, 7(Suppl 1):S14-S17. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S14.:S14-S17, 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S14, 3271825, 20018104.
43. Moat KA, Lavis JN, Clancy SJ, El-Jardali F, Pantoja T. Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt. Bull World Health Organ 2014, 92:20-28. 10.2471/BLT.12.116806, 3865546, 24391297.