Introduction: Writing the history of social science

The Cambridge History of Science: The Modern Social Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-10

  Porter, Theodore M ^a   Ross, Dorothy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927969976     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521594424.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Laurent Loty, Marc Renneville, and Nathalie Richard (Paris: L’Harmattan, 1999), pp. 23-60, 61-78.
2. Roger Smith, The Fontana History of the Human Sciences(London: Fontana Press, 1997).
3. GeorgeW. Stocking, Jr., “On the Limits of ‘Presentism’ and ‘Historicism’ in the Historiography of the Behavioral Sciences” (1965), in his Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in the History of Anthropology (New York: Free Press, 1968), pp. 1-12.
4. Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. enlarged (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), p. 8.
5. Gary Gutting, ed., Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science(Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1980).
6. Robert Young, Darwin’s Metaphor: Nature’s Place in Victorian Culture(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).
7. M. NortonWise, “Work andWaste: Political Economy and Natural Philosophy in Nineteenth-Century Britain,” History of Science, 27 (1989), 263-301.
8. Theodore M. Porter, The Rise of Statistical Thinking,1820-1900(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986).
9. Jill Morawski, ed., The Rise of Experimentation in American Psychology (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1988).
10. A.W. Coats, “Research Priorities in the History of Economics,” all in History of Political Economy, 1 (Spring 1969), 1-18.
11. Mark H. Haller, Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1963).
12. John C. Burnham, since collected in Paths into American Culture (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988).
13. Nathan G. Hale, Jr., Freud and the Americans: The Beginnings of Psychoanalysis in the United States, 1876-1917. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971).
14. Mary O. Furner, Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865-1905 (Lexington:University Press of Kentucky, 1975).
15. Nikolas Rose, The Psychological Complex: Psychology, Politics and Society in England, 1869-1939(London: Routledge, 1985).
16. Quentin Skinner, ed., The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).
17. Hayden White, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse andHistorical Representation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987).
18. Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).