Indeterminacy of translation

The Cambridge Companion to Quine

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 151-180

  Kirk, Robert ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927954432     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521630568.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. H. Putnam, “The Refutation of Conventionalism,” in Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), 159.
2. R. Kirk, Translation Determined (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), 239-50.
3. C. Hill’s “‘Gavagai’,” Analysis 32 (1972): 68-75.
4. G. Evans, “Identity and Prediction,” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975): 346-63.
5. C. Hookway, Quine: Language, Experience and Reality (Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1988), 152-9.
6. C. Wright, “The Indeterminacy of Translation,” in A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, ed. B. Hale and C. Wright (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), 397-426.
7. H. Putnam, Reason, Truth and History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).
8. R. Kirk, Translation Determined (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), 133-52.
9. C. Wright, “The Indeterminacy of Translation,” in A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, ed. B. Hale and C. Wright (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), 413-21.
10. E. Levy, “Competing Radical Translations: Examples, Limitations and Implications,” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (1971): 590-604.
11. H. Field, “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference,” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1973): 462-81.
12. M. Levin, “Forcing and the Indeterminacy of Translation,” Erkenntnis 14 (1979): 25-31.
13. G. Massey, “The Indeterminacy of Translation: A Study in Philosophical Exegesis,” Philosophical Topics 20 (1992): 317-45.
14. J. Bennett, Linguistic Behavior (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976), 262.
15. M. Dummett, “The Significance of Quine’s Indeterminacy Thesis,” in Truth and Other Enigmas (London: Duckworth, 1978), 372.
16. P. Hacker, “Wittgenstein and Quine: Proximity at Great Distance,” in Wittgenstein and Quine, ed. R. Arrington and H.-J. Glock (New York: Routledge, 1996), 15-16.
17. D. Lewis, “Radical Interpretation,” Synthese 27 (1974): 345.
18. R. Rorty, “Indeterminacy of Translation and of Truth,” Synthese 23 (1972): 443-62.
19. R. Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980), 202 ff.
20. R. Kirk, Translation Determined (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), 215-36.
21. L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Blackwell, 1953) §199 and §206.
22. S. Kripke, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982), 55-7.
23. P. Hacker, “Wittgenstein and Quine: Proximity at Great Distance,” in Wittgenstein and Quine, ed. R. Arrington and H.-J. Glock (New York: Routledge, 1996).
24. D. Davidson, “Radical Interpretation,” in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), 127.
25. D. Davidson, “Belief and the Basis of Meaning,” in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), 152.
26. D. Dennett, The Intentional Stance (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1987), 13-42.
27. D. Dennett, “Real Patterns,” Journal of Philosophy 88 (1991): 27-51.