Processes, contexts, and rationale for disinvestment: A protocol for a critical interpretive synthesis

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Wilson, Michael G ^a,b,c   Ellen, Moriah E ^b,d,e   Lavis, John N ^a,b,c,f   Grimshaw, Jeremy M ^g,h   Moat, Kaelan A ^a,b,c   Shemer, Joshua ^e,i   Sullivan, Terry ^j   Garner, Sarah ^k   Goeree, Ron ^c   Grilli, Roberto ^l   Peffer, Justin ^m   Samra, Kevin ⁿ  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^e GERTNER INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH   (Israel)

^f HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^g OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

ⁱ TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^k NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^l Regional Agency for Health and Social Care   (Italy)

^m ONTARIO MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND LONG TERM CARE   (Canada)

ⁿ MINISTRY OF HEALTH   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Appropriateness; Critical interpretive synthesis; Disinvestment; Health system context; Health technologies; Policy development; Policy implementation; Reassessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CRITICAL INTERPRETIVE SYNTHESIS; DISINVESTMENT; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HEALTH POLICY;

EID: 84927935974     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-143     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rich G. Shrinking budgets, improving care: simplify processes and engage with patients. BMJ 2010, 340:1251.
2. Zalmanovitch Y, Vashdi DR. Shrinking budgets, improving care: trade-offs are unavoidable. BMJ 2010, 340:1259.
3. Leggett L, Noseworthy TW, Zarrabi M, Lorenzetti D, Sutherland LR, Clement FM. Health technology reassessment of non-drug technologies: current practices. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012, 28:220-227. 10.1017/S0266462312000438, 22980697.
4. Elshaug AG, Hiller JE, Tunis SR, Moss JR. Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices. Aust N Z Health Policy 2007, 4:23.
5. Elshaug AG, Hiller JE, Moss JR. Exploring policy-makers' perspectives on disinvestment from ineffective healthcare practices. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008, 24:1-9.
6. Elshaug AG, Watt AM, Moss JR, Hiller JE. Policy Perspectives on the Obsolescence of Health Technologies in Canada: A Discussion Paper 2009, Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.
7. Mitton C, Patten S, Donaldson C. Listening to the decision makers: sustainability of PBMA in Alberta. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2004, 3:143-151. 10.2165/00148365-200403030-00005, 15740170.
8. Ibargoyen-Roteta N, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea I, Asua J. Guiding the process of health technology disinvestment. Health Policy 2010, 98:218-226. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.06.018, 20638745.
9. Polisena J, Clifford T, Elshaug AG, Mitton C, Russell E, Skidmore B. Case studies that illustrate disinvestment and resource allocation decision-making processes in health care: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2013, 29:174-184. 10.1017/S0266462313000068, 23514665.
10. Donaldson C, Bate A, Mitton C, Dionne F, Ruta D. Rational disinvestment. QJM 2010, 103:801-807. 10.1093/qjmed/hcq086, 20530539.
11. Elshaug AG, Moss JR, Littlejohns P, Karnon J, Merlin TL, Hiller JE. Identifying existing health care services that do not provide value for money. Med J Aust 2009, 109:269-273.
12. UK Audit Commission Reducing Spending on Low Clinical Value Treatments 2011, London, United Kingdom: Audit Commission, UK Audit Commission.
13. Cook S. Experts' guide to saving money in health. BMJ 2010, 340:c1281.
14. Pearson S, Littlejohns P. Reallocation resources: how should the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guide disinvestment efforts in the Nation Health Service?. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007, 12:160-165. 10.1258/135581907781542987, 17716419.
15. Henshall C, Schuller T, Mardhani-Bayne L. Using health technology assessment to support optimal use of technologies in current practice: the challenge of "disinvestment". Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012, 28:203-210. 10.1017/S0266462312000372, 22792877.
16. Garner S, Docherty M, Somner J, Sharma T, Choudhury M, Clarke M, Littlejohns P. Reducing ineffective practice: challenges in identifying low-value health care using Cochrane systematic reviews. J Health Serv Res Policy 2013, 18:6-12. 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.012044, 23393036.
17. Hughes DA, Ferner RE. New drugs for old: disinvestment and NICE. BMJ 2010, 340:c572. 10.1136/bmj.c572, 20185495.
18. Rich P. Physicians taking lead on appropriateness of care. Can Med Assoc 2013, 21:8.
19. Paprica A. Evidence-Informed Changes to Funded Health Services and Products 2013, Vancouver, Canada: Canadian Association of Health Services and Policy Research Annual Conference.
20. Planning Unit (Health System Planning Research & Analysis Branch of the Health System Strategy & Policy Division - Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care) A Preliminary Literature Review on Models for Disinvestment in Health Care Services 2011, Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Planning Unit (Health System Planning Research & Analysis Branch of the Health System Strategy & Policy Division - Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care).
21. Mitton C, Dionne F, Damji R, Campbell D, Bryan S. Difficult decisions in times of constraint: criteria based resource allocation in the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11:169. 10.1186/1472-6963-11-169, 3155484, 21756357.
22. Mitton C, Patten S, Waldner H, Donaldson C. Priority setting in health authorities: a novel approach to a historical activity. Soc Sci Med 2003, 57:1653-1663. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00549-X, 12948574.
23. Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, Hsu R, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, Riley R, Sutton A. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006, 6:35. 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35, 1559637, 16872487.
24. Boyko JA, Lavis JN, Abelson J, Dobbins M, Carter N. Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making. Soc Sci Med 2012, 75:1938-1945. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.016, 22938912.
25. Wilson MG, Lavis JN, Guta A. Community-based organizations in the health sector: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Syst 2012, 10:36. 10.1186/1478-4505-10-36, 3511187, 23171160.
26. Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (Longman Classics Edition) Second Edition 2010, New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
27. Lazar H, Forest P-G, Lavis JN, Church J. Paradigm Freeze: Why It Is So Hard to Reform Health Care in Canada? 2013, Kingston and Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
28. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches 2007, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.