Low-dose CT lung cancer screening practices and attitudes among primary care providers at an academic medical center

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 664-670

  Lewis, Jennifer A ^a   Petty, W Jeffrey ^a   Tooze, Janet A ^a   Miller, David P ^a   Chiles, Caroline ^a   Miller, Antonius A ^a   Bellinger, Christina ^a   Weaver, Kathryn E ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; LOW DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; LUNG CANCER; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSE PRACTITIONER; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPUTUM CYTODIAGNOSIS; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; VERY ELDERLY;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS, PRIMARY CARE; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84927927292     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: 15387755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1241     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2014. [Accessed January 12, 2014]. Available from URL: http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/cancerfactsfigures2014.
2. Peto R, Darby S, Deo H, Silcocks P, Whitley E, Doll R. Smoking, smoking cessation and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case control studies. BMJ 2000;321: 323-9.
3. The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. New Engl J Med 2011;365:395-407.
4. Wender R, Fontham ETH, Barrera E Jr, Colditz GA, Church TR, Ettinger DS, et al. American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines.CACancer J Clin 2013;63:106-17.
5. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, Azzoli CG, Berry DA, Brawley OW, et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA 2012;307:2418-29.
6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Lung Cancer Screening. Version 1. 2013 [Accessed on January 12, 2014].
7. American Lung Association. Providing Guidance on lung cancer screening. The American Lung Association Interim Report on Lung Cancer Screening. [Accessed on January 12, 2014]. Available from URL: http://www.lung.org/lung-disease/lung-cancer/lung-cancer-screening-guidelines/lung-cancer-screening.pdf.
8. Jaklitsch MT, Jacobson FL, Austin JH, Field JK, Jett JR, Keshavjee S, et al. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high risk groups. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144:33-8.
9. Detterbeck FC, Mazzone PJ, Naidich DP, Bach PB. Diagnosis and Management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143:e78S-e92S.
10. American Academy of Family Physicians. AAFP Clinical Preventive Service Recommendation: Lung Cancer 2013. Available from URL: http://www.aafp.org/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all/lungcancer. html
11. Moyer VA. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:330-8.
12. Doria-Rose VP, White MC, Klabunde CN, Nadel MR, Richards TB, McNeel TS, et al. Use of lung cancer screening tests in the United States: results from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21:1049-59.
13. Ma J, Ward EM, Smith R, Jemal A. Annual number of lung cancer deaths potentially avertable by screening in the United States. Cancer 2013; 119:1381-5.
14. Klabunde CN, Marcus PM, Han PKJ, Richards TB, Vernon SW, Yuan G, et al. Lung cancer screening practices of primary care physicians: results from a national survey. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:102-10.
15. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. A metadatadriven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-81.
16. National Cancer Institute Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Cancer Screening Recommendations and Practices: Colorectal and Lung Cancer Screening Questionnaire. 2006. [Accessed on June 9, 2014]. Available from URL: http://healthservices.cancer.gov/surveys/screening-rp/screening-rp-colo-lung-inst.pdf.
17. National Cancer Institute Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices-Primary Care Physician Questionnaire. [Accessed on June 9, 2014]. Available from URL: http://healthservices.cancer.gov/surveys/colorectal/prim0520.pdf.
18. Humphrey LL, Deffebach M, Pappas M, Baumann C, Artis K, Mitchell JP, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:411-20.
19. Rembold CM. Number needed to screen: development of a statistic for disease screening. BMJ 1998;317:307-12.
20. Jonnalagadda S, Bergamo C, Lin JJ, Lurslurchachai L, DiefenbachM, Smith C, et al. Beliefs and attitudes about lung cancer screening among smokers. Lung Cancer 2012;77:526-31.
21. Goulart BHL, Bensink ME,MummyDG, Ramsey SD. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: costs, national expenditures, and cost-effectiveness. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2012;10:267-75.
22. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:117-28.
23. Pyenson BS, Sander MS, Jiang Y, Kahn H, Mulshine JL. An actuarial analysis shows that offering lung cancer screening as an insurance benefit would save lives at relatively low cost. Health Affair 2012;31:770-9.
24. Villanti AC, Jiang Y, Abrams DB, Pyenson BS. A cost-utility analysis of lung cancer screening and the additional benefits of incorporating smoking cessation interventions. PLOS ONE 2013;8:e71379.
25. Black WC, Gareen IF, Soneji SS, Sicks JD, Keeler EB, Aberle DR, et al. Costeffectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial. New Engl J Med 2014;371:793-802.
26. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Lung Cancer Screening. Version 1.2015 Available from URL: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician-gls/pdf/lung-screening.pdf.
27. McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, Robterts H, Liu G, Soghrati K, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. New Engl J Med 2013;369:910-9.
28. Park ER, Gareen IF, Jain A, Ostroff JS, Duan F, Sicks JD, et al. Examining whether lung cancer screening changes risk perceptions: National Lung Screening Trial participants at 1-year follow up. Cancer 2013;119:1306-13.
29. Zapka JG, Lemon SC. Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations. Cancer 2004;101:1165-87.