Spiders at the cocktail party: An ancestral threat that surmounts inattentional blindness

Evolution and Human Behavior

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 165-173

  New, Joshua J ^a   German, Tamsin C ^b  

^a Barnard College of Columbia University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attentional capture; Biological preparedness; Fears; Inattentional blindness

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; SERPENTES;

EID: 84927910266     PISSN: 10905138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Arnedo M.A., Coddington J., Agnarsson I., Gillespie R.G. From a comb to a tree: Phylogenetic relationships of the comb-footed spiders (Araneae, Theridiidae) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2004, 31:225-245.
2. Aronoff J., Barclay A.M., Stevenson L.A. The recognition of threatening facial stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54:647-655.
3. Barrett H.C., Broesch J. Prepared social learning about dangerous animals in children. Evolution and Human Behavior 2012, 33:499-508.
4. Belopolsky A.V., Zwaan L., Theeuwes J., Kramer A.F. The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:934-938.
5. Berland L. Description de quelques arignées fossils. Revue Française d'Entomologie 1939, 6:1-9.
6. Bernstein D.A., Allen G.J. Fear survey schedule (II): Normative data and factor analyses based upon a large college sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1969, 7(4):403-407.
7. Bettini S. Epidemiology of latrodectism. Toxicon 1964, 2:93-102.
8. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 1987, 94(2):115-147. 10.1037//0033-295X.94.2.115.
9. Blanchette I. Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: How specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:1484-1504.
10. Blumstein D.T., Daniel J.C., Griffin A.S., Evans C.S. Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators. Behavioral Ecology 2000, 11:528-535.
11. Boyer P., Bergstrom B. Threat-detection in child development: An evolutionary perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2011, 35:1034-1041.
12. Brosch T., Sharma D. The role of fear-relevant stimuli in visual search: A comparison of phylogenetic and ontogenetic stimuli. Emotion 2005, 5:360-364.
13. Cave K.R., Batty M.J. From searching for features to searching for threat: Drawing the boundary between preattentive and attentive vision. Visual Cognition 2006, 14:629-646.
14. Coss R.G., Goldthwaite R.O. The persistence of old designs for perception. Perspectives in ethology 11: Behavioral design 1995, Plenum Press, New York. N.S. Thompson (Ed.).
15. Davey G.C.L. Characteristics of individuals with fear of spiders. Anxiety Research 1992, 4:299-314.
16. Davis M., Whalen P.J. The amygdala: Vigilance and emotion. Molecular Psychiatry 2001, 6:13-34.
17. Devue C., Belopolsky A.V., Theeuwes J. The role of fear and expectancies in capture of covert attention by spiders. Emotion 2011, 11(4):768-775.
18. Diaz J.H. The global epidemiology, syndromic classification, management, and prevention of spider bites. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2004, 71:239-250.
19. Efron R., Yund E.W. Spatial uniformities in visual search. Brain and Cognition 1996, 31:331-368.
20. Franconeri S.L., Simons D.J. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65(7):999-1010.
21. Fredrikson M., Annas P., Fischer H., Wik G. Gender and age differences in the prevalence of specific fears and phobias. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1996, 34:33-39.
22. Garb J.E., González A., Gillespie R.G. The black widow spider genus Latrodectus (Araneae: Theridiidae): Phylogeny, biogeography, and invasion history. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2004, 31:1127-1142.
23. Garb J.E., Hayashi C.Y. Molecular evolution of alpha-latrotoxin, the exceptionally potent vertebrate neurotoxin in black widow spider venom. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2013, 30:999-1014.
24. Gibson B.M., Lazareva O.F., Gosselin F., Schyns P.G., Wasserman E.A. Nonaccidental properties underlie shape recognition in mammalian and nonmammalian vision. Current Biology 2007, 17:336-340. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.025.
25. Graudins A., Little M.J., Pineda S.S., Hains P.G., King G.F., Broady K.W., et al. Cloning and activity of a novel alpha-latrotoxin from red-back spider venom. Biochemical Pharmacology 2012, 83:170-183.
26. Hamilton J.G. Needle phobia: A neglected diagnosis. Journal of Family Practice 1995, 41:169-176.
27. Isbell L.A. Snakes as agents of evolutionary change in primate brains. Journal of Human Evolution 2006, 51:1-35.
28. Jackson R.E., Calvillo D.P. Evolutionary relevance facilitates visual information processing. Evolutionary Psychology 2013, 11:1011-1026.
29. Kasturiratne A., Wickremasinghe A.R., de Silva N., Gunawardena N.K., Pathmeswaran A., Premaratna R., et al. The global burden of snakebite: A literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Medicine 2008, 5:1591-1604.
30. Kurbat M.A. Can the recognition of living things really be selectively impaired. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35(6):813-827.
31. Kyllingsbæk S., Schneider W., Bundesen C. Automatic attraction of attention to former targets in visual displays of letters. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63(1):85-98.
32. Langley R.L. Animal-related fatalities in the United States - An update. Wilderness and Environmental Medicine 2005, 16:67-74.
33. Le Q.V., Isbell L.A., Matsumoto J., Nguyen M., Hori E., Maior R.S., et al. Pulvinar neurons reveal neurobiological evidence of past selection for rapid detection of snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2013, 110:19000-19005.
34. Levin D.T., Takarae Y., Miner A.G., Keil F. Efficient visual search by category: Specifying the features that mark the difference between artifacts and animals in preattentive vision. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63(4):676-697.
35. Lipp O.V., Derakshan N., Waters A.M., Logies S. Snakes and cats in the flower bed: Fast detection is not specific to pictures of fear-relevant animals. Emotion 2004, 4:233-250.
36. LoBue V. And along came a spider: An attentional bias for the detection of spiders in young children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2010, 107:59-66.
37. LoBue V. What are we so afraid of? How early attention shapes our most common fears. Child Development Perspectives 2012, 7:38-42.
38. LoBue V., DeLoache J.S. Detecting the snake in the grass: Attention to fear-relevant stimuli by adults and young children. Psychological Science 2008, 19:284-289.
39. Mack A., Pappas Z., Silverman M., Gay R. What we see: Inattention and the capture of attention by meaning. Consciousness and Cognition 2002, 11:488-506.
40. Mack A., Rock I. Inattentional blindness 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Maretić Z. Latrodectism: Variations in clinical manifestations provoked by Latrodectus species of spiders. Toxicon 1983, 21:457-466.
42. Marks I.M., Nesse R.M. Fear and fitness: An evolutionary analysis of anxiety disorders. Ethology and Sociobiology 1994, 15:247-261.
43. Mineka S., Öhman A. Phobias and preparedness: The selective, automatic, and encapsulated nature of fear. Biological Psychiatry 2002, 52:927-937.
44. Most S.B., Scholl B.J., Clifford E.R., Simons D.J. What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review 2005, 112(1):217-242.
45. Müller G.J. Black and brown widow spider bites in South Africa. South African Medical Journal 1992, 83:399-405.
46. New J., Cosmides L., Tooby J. Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007, 104(42):16598-16603.
47. New J., Schultz R.T., Wolf J., Niehaus J.L., Klin A., German T.C., et al. The scope of social attention deficits in autism: Prioritized orienting to people and animals in static natural scenes. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(1):51-59.
48. Newby E.A., Rock I. Inattentional blindness as a function of proximity to the focus of attention. Perception 1998, 27:1025-1040.
49. Notebaert L., Crombez G., Van Damme S., De Houwer J., Theeuwes J. Looking out for danger: An attentional bias towards spatially predictable threatening stimuli. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2010, 48:1150-1154.
50. Öhman A. Fear and anxiety: Overlaps and dissociations. Handbook of emotions 2008, The Guilford Press, New York, NY. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, L.F. Barrett (Eds.).
51. Öhman A., Flykt A., Esteves F. Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130:466-478.
52. Öhman A., Lundqvist D., Esteves F. The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80(3):381-396.
53. Öhman A., Mineka S. Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review 2001, 108:483-522.
54. Öhman A., Mineka S. The malicious serpent: Snakes as a protoypical stimulus for an evolved module of fear. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2003, 12(1):5-9.
55. Petrunkevitch A. A study of amber spiders. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 1942, 34:119-464.
56. Pflugshaupt T., Mosimann U.P., von Wartburt R., Schmitt W., Nyffeler T., Müri R.M. Hypervigilance-avoidance pattern in spider phobia. Anxiety Disorders 2005, 19:105-116.
57. Phelps E.A., LeDoux J.E. Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: From animal models to human behavior. Neuron 2005, 48:175-187.
58. Poulton R., Menzies R.G. Non-associative fear acquisition: A review of the evidence from retrospective and longitudinal research. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2002, 2002(40):127-149.
59. Superlab Pro for Windows 1997, Cedrus Corporation, Phoenix, AZ.
60. Rachman S. The conditioning theory of fear-acquisition: A critical examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1977, 15:375-387.
61. Rakison D.H., Derringer J. Do infants possess an evolved spider-detection mechanism?. Cognition 2008, 107:381-393.
62. Russell F.E. Venomous arthropods. Veterinary and Human Toxicology 1991, 33:505-508.
63. Russell F.E., Marcus P., Streng J.A. Black widow spider envenomation during pregnancy. Report of a case. Toxicon 1979, 17:188-189.
64. Sawchuk C.N., Lohr J.M., Lee T.C., Tolin D.F. Exposure to disgust-evoking imagery and information processing biases in blood-injection-injury phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1999, 37:249-257.
65. Schmidt J., Zelinsky G.J. Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62(10):1904-1914.
66. Schneider W., Eschmann A., Zuccolotto A. E-Prime user's guide 2002, Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA.
67. Seligman M.E.P. Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy 1971, 2:307-320.
68. Shiffrin R.M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 1977, 84(2):127-190.
69. Steiper M.E., Young N.M., Sukarna T.Y. Genomic data support the hominoid slowdown and an Early Oligocene estimate for the hominoid-cercopithecoid divergence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2004, 101:17021-17026.
70. Szwed M., Cohen L., Qiao E., Dehaene S. The role of invariant line junctions in object and visual word recognition. Vision Research 2009, 49:718-725. 10.1016/j.visres.2009.01.003.
71. Tipples J., Young A.W., Quinlan P., Broks P., Ellis A.W. Searching for threat. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2002, 55A:1007-1026.
72. Tolin D.F., Lohr J.M., Sawchuk C.N., Lee T.C. Disgust and disgust sensitivity in blood-injection-injury and spider phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1997, 35(10):949-953.
73. Tooby J., Cosmides L. The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology 1990, 11:375-424.
74. Tulving E., Schacter D.L. Priming and human memory systems. Science 1990, 247:301-306.
75. Vidal N. Colubroid systematics: Evidence for an early appearance of the venom apparatus followed by extensive evolutionary tinkering. Journal of Toxicology - Toxin Reviews 2002, 21:21-41.
76. Vuilleumier P. How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:585-594.
77. Vuilleumier P., Schwartz S. Beware and be aware: Capture of spatial attention by fear-related stimuli in neglect. NeuroReport 2001, 12:1119-1122.
78. Waters A.M., Lipp O.V., Randhawa R.S. Visual search with animal fear-relevant stimuli: A tale of two procedures. Motivation and Emotion 2011, 35:23-32.
79. Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S., Kenner N., Hyle M., Vasan N. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research 2004, 44:1411-1426.
80. Wolfe M.D., Myers O., Caravati E.M., Rayburn W.F., Seifert S.A. Black widow spider envenomation in pregnancy. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2011, 24:122-126.
81. Wood N., Cowan N. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21(1):255-260.
82. Wolpe J., Lang P. A fear survey schedule for use in behaviour therapy. Behaviour Research Therapy 1964, 2:27-30.
83. Yonas A. Infants' responses to optical information for collision. Development of perception: Vol. 2. The visual system 1981, Academic Press, New York. R.N. Aslin, J.R. Alberts, M.R. Peterson (Eds.).
84. Yonas A., Bechtold G., Frankel D., Gordon F.R., McRoberts G., Norcia A., et al. Development of sensitivity to information for impending collision. Perception & Psychophysics 1977, 21:97-104.