The significance spectrum and EIA significance determinations

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 87-97

  Ehrlich, Alan ^a   Ross, William ^b  

^a Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

EIA decision making; EIA significance determination; significance spectrum; societal values

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ETHICS; PHILOSOPHY;

EID: 84927786673     PISSN: 14615517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2014.981023     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. BeanlandsG, DuinkerP. 1983. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies. Halifax, Canada: Dalhousie University and Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office.
2. BengstonD. 1994. Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 7(6):515–533.
3. BriggsS, HudsonM. 2013. Determination of significance in ecological impact assessment: past change, current practice and future improvements. EIA Review. 38:16–25.
4. CattonW, DunlapR. 1978. Environmental sociology: a new paradigm. Env. Sociology. 13:41–49.
5. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. 1996. Reference guide on physical and cultural heritage resources; [accessed 2014 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/default.asp?lang = En&n = 1BE75513-1&offset = &toc = hide.
6. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. 2012. Reference guide: determining whether a project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects; [accessed 2014 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/default.asp?lang = En&n = D213D286-1&offset = 3&toc = show.
7. CEQ (Council on Environmental Quality), Executive Office of the President. 2005. Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. Government of the United States of America; [accessed 2014 Mar 6]. Available from: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/NEPA-40CFR1500_1508.pdf.
8. ChristensenV, EhrlichA, WhiteG. 2007. Involving Canada's indigenous peoples in environmental assessment: co-management through the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment; Seoul, Korea; [accessed 2014 Mar 6]. Available from: http://www.reviewboard.ca/upload/ref_library/IAIA%20paper%20re%20Co-mgmt%20through%20the%20MVEIRB;%20Seoul%20Korea%20June%202007%20_1182980894.pdf.
9. De Beers. 2014 Feb. Gahcho Kue Project aquatic effects management plan. Presentation at AEMP Workshop, Yellowknife; p. 75; [accessed 2014 Mar 11]. Available from: http://www.mvlwb.ca/Boards/MV/SitePages/search.aspx?app = MV2005L2-0015.
10. DunlapR, Van LiereK. 1978. The ‘new environmental paradigm’. J Environ Educ. 9(4):10–19.
11. EC (European Commission). 2001. Guidance on EIA screening. Luxembourg, p. 25; [accessed 2014 Mar 6]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-guidelines/g-screening-full-text.pdf.
12. EhrlichA. 2007 Nov. Thresholds in EIA: where to draw the line. Presentation to the 35th Annual Geoscience Forum; Yellowknife, NT, Canada.
13. EhrlichA. 2009 Nov. The significance spectrum. Presentation to the 37th Annual Geoscience Forum; Yellowknife, NT, Canada.
14. GibsonR, HassanS, HoltzS, TanseyJ, WhitelawG. 2005. Sustainability assessment criteria, processes and applications. London: Earthscan.
15. GlassonJ, TherivelR, ChadwickA.2012. Introduction to impact assessment. 3rd ed.New York: Routledge.
16. Government of Canada. 1992. Bill C-37: Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 1992. Sec. 16 (1)(a).
17. Government of Canada. 1998. Bill C-6: Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act, 1998. Part 5. Sec. 128.
18. Government of Canada. 2012. Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012. Sec. 52 (1).
19. HardingR, ed. 1998. Environmental decision-making: the roles of scientists, engineers and the public. Annandale: The Federation Press.
20. HaugPT, BurwellRW, SteinA, BandurskiBL. 1984. Determining the significance of environmental issues under the National Environmental Policy Act. J Environ Manage. 18:15–24.
21. Larcombe P, Winds and Voices Environmental Services Inc. 2000. Determining significance of environmental effects: an aboriginal perspective. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency; [accessed 2014 Mar 6]. Available from: http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/200/301/ceaa-acee/research_and_devt-e/determining_significance/015/0002/0003/4_e.htm.
22. LawrenceD. 2005. Significance criteria and determination in sustainability-based environmental impact assessment (Final report). Prepared for Mackenzie Gas Project Joint Review Panel, Lawrence Environmental; [accessed 2014 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/155701CE-docs/David_Lawrence-eng.pdf.
23. LawrenceD. 2007. Impact significance determination – back to basics. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:755–769.
24. LyhneI, KornovL. 2013. How do we make sense of significance? Indications and reflections on an experiment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 31(3):180–189.
25. MVEIRB (Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board). 2004. Environmental impact assessment guidelines. Yellowknife; [accessed 2014 Mar 6]. Available from: http://reviewboard.ca.
26. MVEIRB. 2006. Reference bulletin: operational interpretation of key terminology. Yellowknife; [accessed 2014 Mar 6]. Available from: http://reviewboard.ca.
27. MVEIRB. 2013. Report of environmental assessment and reasons for decision: Giant Mine remediation project. Yellowknife; [accessed 2014 Mar 6]. Available from: http://reviewboard.ca/upload/project_document/EA0809-001_Giant_Report_of_Environmental_Assessment_June_20_2013.PDF.
28. RacherK, HutchinsonN, HartD, FraserB, ClarkB, FequetR, EwaschukP, Cliffe-PhillipsM. 2011. Linking environmental assessment to environmental regulation through adaptive management. Integr Environ Assess Manage. 7:301–302.
29. RokeachM. 1973. The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press.
30. RokeachM. 1979. Understanding human values: individual and societal. New York: Simon and Schuster.
31. RowanM. 2012. Refining the attribution of significance in social impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 27(3):185–191.
32. SadarM. 1996. Environmental impact assessment. 2nd ed. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.
33. SadlerB. 1996. International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment final report – environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
34. SadlerB, FullerK, RidgwayB, McCabeM, BaileyJ, SaundersR. 2002. Environmental impact assessment training resource manual. 2nd ed. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme.
35. SenecalP, GoldsmithB, ConoverS, SadlerB, BrownK.1999. Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice. Fargo, USA: International Association for Impact Assessment.
36. SippeR. 1999. Criteria and standards for assessing significant impact. In: PettsJ, editor. Handbook of environmental impact assessment volume 1: process, methods and potential. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science; p. 74–92.
37. WestonJ. 2000. EIA, decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK practice. Journal of Env. Assess. Policy & Manage. 43(2):185–203.
38. WoodG. 2008. Thresholds and criteria for evaluating and communicating impact significance in environmental statements: ‘see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil’?EIA Review. 28(1):22–38.
39. WoodG, BeckerJ. 2004 Apr. Evaluating and communicating impact significance in EIA: a fuzzy set approach to articulating stakeholder perspectives. Presentation to the International Association of Impact Assessment Conference; Vancouver, Canada; p. 26–29 [abstracts volume, p. 73–74].
40. World Bank. 2013. Operational policy 4.01 – environmental assessment. Washington, DC: World Bank; [accessed 2014 Mar 6]. Available from: http://www.worldbank.org/.