-
1
-
-
0035822324
-
Systematic reviews in healthcare: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
-
Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in healthcare: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001; 323:42-46.
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.323
, pp. 42-46
-
-
Jüni, P.1
Altman, D.G.2
Egger, M.3
-
2
-
-
0032513744
-
CONSORT: Anevolving tool to help improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials. Consolidated standards of reporting trials
-
Moher D. CONSORT: anevolving tool to help improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials. Consolidated standards of reporting trials. JAMA 1998; 279:1489-1491.
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.279
, pp. 1489-1491
-
-
Moher, D.1
-
3
-
-
6844250792
-
Understanding controlled trials. Why are randomised controlled trials important?
-
Sibbald B, Roland M. Understanding controlled trials. Why are randomised controlled trials important? BMJ 1998; 316:201.
-
(1998)
BMJ
, vol.316
, pp. 201
-
-
Sibbald, B.1
Roland, M.2
-
4
-
-
84861854247
-
Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals
-
Ghimire S, Kyung E, Kang W, Kim E. Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals. Trials 2012; 13:77.
-
(2012)
Trials
, vol.13
, pp. 77
-
-
Ghimire, S.1
Kyung, E.2
Kang, W.3
Kim, E.4
-
5
-
-
9444255722
-
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement
-
Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996; 276:637-639.
-
(1996)
JAMA
, vol.276
, pp. 637-639
-
-
Begg, C.1
Cho, M.2
Eastwood, S.3
-
6
-
-
77953611072
-
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
-
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63:e1-e37.
-
(2010)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.63
, pp. e1-e37
-
-
Moher, D.1
Hopewell, S.2
Schulz, K.F.3
-
7
-
-
77950189829
-
CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
-
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. Group CONSORT. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340:c332.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.340
, pp. c332
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Altman, D.G.2
Moher, D.3
-
8
-
-
77950278169
-
The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: Comparative study of articles indexed in pubmed
-
Hopewell S, Dutton S, Yu M, et al. The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in pubmed. BMJ 2010; 340:c723.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.340
, pp. c723
-
-
Hopewell, S.1
Dutton, S.2
Yu, M.3
-
9
-
-
80052709618
-
Adherence to guidelines for improved quality of data reporting: Where are we today?
-
Elia N, Tramèr MR. Adherence to guidelines for improved quality of data reporting: where are we today? Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:478-480.
-
(2011)
Eur J Anaesthesiol
, vol.28
, pp. 478-480
-
-
Elia, N.1
Tramèr, M.R.2
-
10
-
-
67650082352
-
Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: Review
-
Charles P, Giraudeau B, Dechartres A, et al. Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review. BMJ 2009; 338:b1732.
-
(2009)
BMJ
, vol.338
-
-
Charles, P.1
Giraudeau, B.2
Dechartres, A.3
-
11
-
-
84873195412
-
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals
-
Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, et al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11:MR000030.
-
(2012)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, vol.11
-
-
Turner, L.1
Shamseer, L.2
Altman, D.G.3
-
12
-
-
84902687649
-
Outcomes and statistical power in adult critical care randomized trials
-
Harhay MO, Wagner J, Ratcliffe SJ, et al. Outcomes and statistical power in adult critical care randomized trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 189:1469-1478.
-
(2014)
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
, vol.189
, pp. 1469-1478
-
-
Harhay, M.O.1
Wagner, J.2
Ratcliffe, S.J.3
-
13
-
-
84880312407
-
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in intensive care medicine from 2001 to 2010
-
Latronico N, Metelli M, Turin M, et al. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in intensive care medicine from 2001 to 2010. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39:1386-1395.
-
(2013)
Intensive Care Med
, vol.39
, pp. 1386-1395
-
-
Latronico, N.1
Metelli, M.2
Turin, M.3
-
14
-
-
77952787734
-
Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes
-
Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 2010; 303:2058-2064.
-
(2010)
JAMA
, vol.303
, pp. 2058-2064
-
-
Boutron, I.1
Dutton, S.2
Ravaud, P.3
Altman, D.G.4
-
16
-
-
23044436673
-
The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement
-
Mills EJ, Wu P, Gagnier J, Devereaux PJ. The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement. Contemp Clin Trials 2005; v26:480-487.
-
(2005)
Contemp Clin Trials
, vol.26
, pp. 480-487
-
-
Mills, E.J.1
Wu, P.2
Gagnier, J.3
Devereaux, P.J.4
-
17
-
-
80052727515
-
Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of consolidated standards of reporting trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals
-
Can OS, Yilmaz AA, Hasdogan M, et al. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of consolidated standards of reporting trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:485-492.
-
(2011)
Eur J Anaesthesiol
, vol.28
, pp. 485-492
-
-
Can, O.S.1
Yilmaz, A.A.2
Hasdogan, M.3
-
18
-
-
84863586045
-
Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: Interrupted time series analysis
-
Hopewell S, Ravaud P, Baron G, Boutron I. Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. BMJ 2012; 344:e4178.
-
(2012)
BMJ
, vol.344
-
-
Hopewell, S.1
Ravaud, P.2
Baron, G.3
Boutron, I.4
-
19
-
-
0036698254
-
Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials
-
Hill CL, LaValley MP, Felson DT. Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55:783-786.
-
(2002)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.55
, pp. 783-786
-
-
Hill, C.L.1
LaValley, M.P.2
Felson, D.T.3
-
20
-
-
0346688601
-
Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: Observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the radiation therapy oncology group
-
Soares HP, Daniels S, Kumar A, et al. Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the radiation therapy oncology group. BMJ 2004; 328:22-24.
-
(2004)
BMJ
, vol.328
, pp. 22-24
-
-
Soares, H.P.1
Daniels, S.2
Kumar, A.3
|