Nurses' use of clinical decision support: A literature review

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 562-568

  Piscotty, Ronald ^a   Kalisch, Beatrice ^b  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

CDSS; Clinical decision support; Empirical review; Nursing; Use

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NURSE; STANDARDS; UTILIZATION;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NURSES;

EID: 84927698293     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: 15389774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000110     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Ash J, Sittig DF, Poon EG, et al. The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(4):415-423.
2. Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics. 2005;116(6):1506-1512.
3. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293(10):1197-1203.
4. Aarts J, Ash J, Berg M. Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(1):S4-S13.
5. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care-an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(5):542-549.
6. Dykes PC, Hurley A, Cashen M, Bakken S, Duffy ME. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Impact of Health Information Technology (I-HIT) Scale. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(4):507-514.
7. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999.
8. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
9. US Department of Health and Human Services. Health communication and health information technology. Updated November 13, 2013. http://http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/health-communication-and-health-information-technology. Accessed November 13, 2013.
10. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Interactive List of Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) Areas. Published June 30, 2009. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2009/ComparativeEffectiveness ResearchPriorities.aspx. Accessed December 3, 2010.
11. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). HIMSS Health Information Exchange: ARRA, HITECH FAQs Related to HIE. Published February 3, 2010. http://www.himss.org/files/HIMSSorg/content/files/12-04-09-ARRAHITECHHIE-FactSheet.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2010.
12. Goldzweig CL, Towfigh A, Maglione M, Shekelle PG. Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):w282-w293.
13. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computerbased clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc. 1998;280(15):1339-1346.
14. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 2005;330(7494):765-768.
15. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293(10):1223-1238.
16. Randell R, Mitchell N, Dowding D, Cullum N, Thompson C. Effects of computerized decision support systems on nursing performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(4):242-249.
17. Titler M. The evidence for evidence-based practice implementation. In: Hughes RG, ed. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidenced-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2008. Chapter 7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2659/.
18. Alquraini H, Alhashem AM, Shah MA, Chowdhury RI. Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards the use of computerized health information systems in Kuwaiti hospitals. J Adv Nurs. 2007;57(4):375-381.
19. Dowding D, Mitchell N, Randell R, Foster R, Lattimer V, Thompson C. Nurses' use of computerised clinical decision support systems: a case site analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(8):1159-1167.
20. O'Cathain A, Munro J, Armstrong I, O'Donnell C, Heaney D. The effect of attitude to risk on decisions made by nurses using computerised decision support software in telephone clinical assessment: an observational study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:39.
21. Powell-Cope G, Nelson AL, Patterson ES. Patient care technology and safety. In: Hughes RG, ed. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidenced-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. Chapter 50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2686/.
22. Courtney KL, Alexander GL, Demiris G. Information technology from novice to expert: implementation implications. J Nurs Manag. 2008;16(6):692-699.
23. Randell R, Dowding D. Organisational influences on nurses' use of clinical decision support systems. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(6):412-241.
24. Dowding D, Randell R, Mitchell N, et al. Experience and nurses use of computerised decision support systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;146:506-510.
25. Cho I, Staggers N, Park I. Nurses' responses to differing amounts and information content in a diagnostic computer-based decision support application. Comput Inform Nurs. 2010;28(2):95-102.
26. Ernesäter A, Holmström I, Engström M. Telenurses' experiences of working with computerized decision support: supporting, inhibiting and quality improving. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(5):1074-1083.
27. Weber S, Courtney KL, Benham-Hutchins M. Decision support in multi-professional communication. J Med Syst. 2009;33(1):59-65.
28. Campion TR Jr, Waitman LR, Lorenzi NM, May AK, Gadd CS. Barriers and facilitators to the use of computer-based intensive insulin therapy. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80(12):863-871.
29. Randell R, Mitchell N, Thompson C, McCaughan D, Dowding D. Supporting nurse decision making in primary care: exploring use of and attitude to decision tools. Health Informatics J. 2009;15(1):5-16.
30. Saleem JJ, Patterson ES, Militello L, Render ML, Orshansky G, Asch SM. Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(4):438-447.
31. Marshall AP, West SH, Aitken LM. Preferred information sources for clinical decision making: critical care nurses' perceptions of information accessibility and usefulness. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2011;8(4):224-235.
32. Saleem JJ, Patterson ES, Militello L, et al. Impact of clinical reminder redesign on learnability, efficiency, usability, and workload for ambulatory clinic nurses. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(5):632-640.
33. Weir CR, Nebeker JJ, Hicken BL, Campo R, Drews F, Lebar B. A cognitive task analysis of information management strategies in a computerized provider order entry environment. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):65-75.
34. O'Neill ES, Dluhy NM, Hansen AS, Ryan JR. Coupling the N-CODES system with actual nurse decision-making. Comput Inform Nurs. 2006;24(1):28-34.
35. Choi M, Choi R, Bae YR, Lee SM. Clinical decision support systems for patient safety: a focus group needs assessment with Korean ICU nurses. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;29(11):671-678.
36. Piscotty RJ, Tzeng HM. Exploring the clinical information system implementation readiness activities to support nursing in hospital settings. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;29(11):648-656.
37. Staggers N, Weir C, Phansalkar S. Patient safety and health information technology: role of the electronic health record. In: Hughes RG, ed. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidenced-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. Chapter 47. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2644/.