Effect of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve and aortic valve replacement surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass

Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 172-178

  Kaushal, Ram Prasad ^a   Vatal, Ajay ^a   Pathak, Radhika ^a  

^a GANDHI MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Cardiac anesthesia; CPB; Etomidate; Propofol

Indexed keywords

ETOMIDATE; GLUCOSE; HYDROCORTISONE; PROPOFOL; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD OXYGEN TENSION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING; FEMALE; FISHER EXACT TEST; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEART INDEX; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HYDROCORTISONE BLOOD LEVEL; HYPOTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULMONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION PRESSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STUDENT T TEST; SYSTEMIC VASCULAR RESISTANCE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VASCULAR RESISTANCE; AORTA VALVE; BLOOD; DRUG EFFECTS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HEMODYNAMICS; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; SURGERY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; AORTIC VALVE; BLOOD GLUCOSE; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; ETOMIDATE; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYDROCORTISONE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; PROPOFOL; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84927634904     PISSN: 09719784     EISSN: 09745181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0971-9784.154470     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boer F, Bovill JG, Ros P, van Ommen H. Effect of thiopentone, etomidate and propofol on systemic vascular resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass. Br J Anaesth 1991;67:69-72.
2. Lischke V, Probst S, Behne M, Kessler P. ST segment changes in the ECG. Anesthesia induction with propofol, etomidate or midazolam in patients with coronary heart disease. Anaesthesist 1993;42:435-40.
3. Patrick MR, Blair IJ, Feneck RO, Sebel PS. A comparison of the haemodynamic effects of propofol (Diprivan) and thiopentone in patients with coronary artery disease. Postgrad Med J 1985;61 Suppl 3:23-7.
4. Singh R, Choudhury M, Kapoor PM, Kiran U. A randomized trial of anesthetic induction agents in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Card Anaesth 2010;13:217-23.
5. Stowe DF, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP. Comparison of etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental on function and metabolism of isolated hearts. Anesth Analg 1992;74:547-58.
6. Bendel S, Ruokonen E, Pölönen P, Uusaro A. Propofol causes more hypotension than etomidate in patients with severe aortic stenosis: A double-blind, randomized study comparing propofol and etomidate. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007;51:284-9.
7. Boer F, Ros P, Bovill JG, van Brummelen P, van der Krogt J. Effect of propofol on peripheral vascular resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass. Br J Anaesth 1990;65:184-9.
8. Ebert TJ, Muzi M, Berens R, Goff D, Kampine JP. Sympathetic responses to induction of anesthesia in humans with propofol or etomidate. Anesthesiology 1992;76:725-33.
9. Hosten T, Solak M, Kilickan L, Ozdamar D, Toker K. The effects of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine responses in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Balkan Med J 2007;24:114-26.
10. Gooding JM, Weng JT, Smith RA, Berninger GT, Kirby RR. Cardiovascular and pulmonary responses following etomidate induction of anesthesia in patients with demonstrated cardiac disease. Anesth Analg 1979;58:40-1.
11. Pandey AK, Makhija N, Chauhan S, Das S, Usha Kiran, Bisoi AK, et al. The effects of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. World J Cardiovasc Surg 2012;2:48-53.
12. Zurick AM, Sigurdsson H, Koehler LS. Magnitude and time course of perioperative adrenal suppression with single dose etomidate in male adult cardiac surgical patients. Anesthesiology 1986;65:248.
13. Colvin MP, Savege TM, Newland PE, Weaver EJ, Waters AF, Brookes JM, et al. Cardiorespiratory changes following induction of anaesthesia with etomidate in patients with cardiac disease. Br J Anaesth 1979;51:551-6.
14. Criado A, Maseda J, Navarro E, Escarpa A, Avello F. Induction of anaesthesia with etomidate: Haemodynamic study of 36 patients. Br J Anaesth 1980;52:803-6.
15. Rahman MH, Mondal BC, Ahmed NC, Ilam SD, Faruquee ZA. Hemodynamic response after induction of anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery for poor LV function. A comparison between thiopental/fentanyl and etomidate/fentanyl. Birdem Med J 2013;3:23-6.
16. Vermeyen KM, Erpels FA, Janssen LA, Beeckman CP, Hanegreefs GH. Propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia for coronary bypass surgery in patients with good left ventricular function. Br J Anaesth 1987;59:1115-20.
17. Kaplan JA, Guffin AV, Mikula S, Dolman J, Profeta J. Comparative hemodynamic effects of propofol and thiamylal sodium during anesthetic induction for myocardial revascularization. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1988;2:297-302.
18. Yunqi L, Juhong R, Wenxia Z. Etomidate for induction of anesthesia in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. J Med Forum 2006;02.
19. Morel J, Salard M, Castelain C, Bayon MC, Lambert P, Vola M, et al. Haemodynamic consequences of etomidate administration in elective cardiac surgery: A randomized double-blinded study. Br J Anaesth 2011;107:503-9.